Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A New Way of Looking at Interest- 1st successful Claim - N'wide


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There are 2 types of interest.

 

The 8% is on top of everything, and it is this that is replaced by the contractual rate.

 

If you have an interest free amount of £250, this will go in the spreadsheet I designed. If you're stuck further please PM me.

 

Vamp.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 821
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To clarify, now I'm not at my desk pretending to work. The first spreadsheet includes charges and interest applied to those charges. These are amounts unlawfully deducted from you. You are entitled to 8% on all of this.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand this but I was saying that the contractual rate of interest will come in below the 8% County Courts Act figure. I will therefore be using that.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Incidentally, if anyone having read through this decides to go for higher rates (do not do so until you understand the rationale first), you might want to know that for current accounts, you are looking primarily at the unauthorised overdraft rate, and for credit cards, the cash advance rate (typically higher than the purchase rate).

 

The reasoning for this being:

 

1. Whether or not you have been over your limit, the bank has taken this money without your permission, hence it is unauthorised borrowing and is chargeable at the contractual rate for doing so.

 

2. The bank charges higher interest on purchasing cash with your credit card than with purchasing goods. If it makes a charge on your credit card, it is effectively getting cash and not goods, so it would fall under the cash rate not the purchase rate. However, do not take the handling charges into account - these can probably be argued as a charge for a legitimate service (you requested the cash, and you benefit from it).

 

As always, everything I say could be completely wrong, so a pinch of salt is well-advised.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually meagain, you have brought up an interesting point. If your credit card charge a cash advance fee, then perhaps we should add that to each charge taken as well?

 

Just a thought. :)

Very funny Alan. Careful, one day someone might think you're serious. Lol.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try adding to your claim the equivalent cash advance handling fees for taking £30 each time, though I strongly suspect the judge would see this in roughly the same way he would a catheter (think about it). ;)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys-

 

My query is-

 

Having issued my County Court Claim against Morgan Stanley-

 

I stated on the particulars of claim that I am claiming £388.20 in fines + interest worked out on a daily rate, from the date of each fine that was levied at a rate of 15% plus £58.2956 worked out on the CCA rate of 8%. However, I did state on the particulars of claim that I was claiming the contractual rate of interest, or in the alternative the County Court Act rate of interest, but I only actually scribed £58.2956 and I should have stated = £116+ or in the alternative.....stupid me!!?

 

I have to submit my Allocation Questionnaire tomorrow! Scary.....

 

Okay, I think that I understand as to how one fills out the Allocation Questionnaire, but....

I also forgot to write on my 'Particulars of Claim', that I was claiming interest up to the day of judgement....Can I add the extra days of interest on the Allocation Questionnaire???? and....because I am rejecting the offer that Morgan Stanley has offered, how do I change the requested refund of interest £58.2956 worked out @8% to the contractual rate to approximately = £111.00..ish @ 15.9% but probably more.

 

I hope all of this makes sense but I would like some help, because I do not want to fail.

 

I promise that I will donate to the BAG:) if MS ever pay me the Monies that are owed?

 

Thanks

angry cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware you cannot change your claim via the AQ - I am fairly sure that you would need to amend the original claim, and then the court will reissue the N1. However, there is a charge for this which is not recoverable, and it will seriously delay things.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay Alan-

 

But I CLEARLY stated on the particulars of claim....

that I was claiming the contractual rate, or in the alternative the CCA 8%.

I wish Bankfodder would help me on this!!!

 

I have tried to pm him...to no avail!

 

My mind is made up about going 'Head to Head'against MS......BUT I really do need some expert help.

 

I phoned the OFT today, who seem to think that I need expertise on who was responsible for the contract? This is a nightmare for me....

Having said that I will stand up for my 'Rights' with correct advice.

 

I just want to know what I can add to my ' Allocation Questionnaire ' or should I request - ' A Stay ', because MS are spouting 'Court Protocol'.!

 

angry cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that the N1 is a legal document, and your case will go forward on the figures you have given. Any change now will costs you money, and will delay payment.

 

Obviously you could speak to the court office, but I really do feel that you are in a corner on this one. Sorry I cannot be more positive, but it is vital that people check every line of their claim before issuing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying. but could I re-issue the claim and if I decide to follow this train of thought, would the Court be understanding.

 

When I issued the claim I was just thinking about the 'actual' 'penalty charges' foolishly. like many other consumers I paid little attention to the various rates of interest that were applied to the charges, that changed over the days, months and years. I requested a refund of my charges plus an approximate interest rate of 15% that I worked out on a daily rate, from the date of each charge/penalty up to 1 June 2006. However, I forgot to state 'up to the day of judgement'

 

It is very hard for someone that does not have a legalistic mind-

where everything has to be factual, or has case Law.

 

Obviously I have to re-jig the whole claim...

What do you think?

 

I have suffered so much stress over the Morgan Stanley issue....and their rubbish PPI, that leaves an ill person in debt!!!!

 

 

 

angry cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

As previouslt advised, you can amend the claim if you wish to. But this will cost you £35 and you cannot add this cost to your claim.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that you are able to amend the claim, however, as I said above there is a fee for this which you would not be able to reclaim. I think the best advice is to ring the court in the morning and and ask what they suggest for a way forward.

 

With the AQ deadline being tomorrow you well need a senior person at the court to approve anything that means you will not be filing - you don't want to end up with your claim being struck out.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I understand.

 

I wish that I had been a bit smarter when I issued the claim !

 

I actually did write on the particulars of Claim that I was claiming the contractual rate of interest, or in the alternative the section 69 CCA interest rate of 8%.

However, i was in such a dither about submitting the claim that I simply claimed the charges plus interest and added the CCA 8%, when factually I should have requested the contractual rate figure along with the CCA 8% figure, thus by quoting both amounts, there would have been an alternative amount to claim-

I hope that I am ,making myself clear...anyhow, I have decided to submit my AQ as the claim stands because the change would cost £35.00, which would make the difference only approximately £23.00.

 

Still, I will be wiser in the future and I am still battling with Egg, MBNA and then the last but not least 'Mountain that I will have to climb' ! will be regarding penalty fines on my A&L mortgage-

Now that one really is the scariest of them all!!!!!!

 

angry cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have read throught his thread and am interested but just a little confused on llegal part of claiming 16% interest instead of the initial 8%.

 

I am helping my boyfriend with his claim and we are now making a claim to the courts as the bank in question have not paid up!.

 

I have calculated the 8% interest accordingly, But am still interested about claiming the 16%

 

I might sound greedy, but its not about being greedy its just about claiming what I am owed.

 

The banks etc, do not have any leway when it comes to charging us, t&cs etc.

 

So if we are llegally alowed to claim 16% interest then we should go for it, as many people that have now been paid, have lost out on the extra claim of Interest and the fianancial institutes know it, But are keeping very Quiet........

 

I have read the whole thread through and did not see anything about any legal status regarding this increase in interest.

 

Would it be laughed out of court and do you have any solid docs where I can quote on my particulars as I cant seem to find anything on act 's69' etc

 

Appreciate any suggests or help :)

 

Anita

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a little confused that you say you have read through the thread and cannot see the legal basis. That is discussed in detail in posts 1 to 5, and then in various other posts in the thread.

 

Hi.

 

Sorry, I understand you may be slightly worried that I say I have read through the posts to find certain information etc. and yet I say I cant find somethin relevant to my question

 

Please dont take this personally, yet you could try and make something good out of my post.

 

If a dyslexic person was trying to claim back charges taken from them, and made it clear to you that they were dyslexic, would 'The bank action group Mods 'be so hasty into stating that the Faqs have not been read, all the time, that when a question has been asked by someone and a mod doesnt fancie answering it because it is all in the Faqs, threads etc

 

Maybe there are some people who do suffer from Dyslexia who are members of this site trying to claim back charges. and now feel that they wont bother! because it is all written down in the Faqs, threads etc, etc......

 

Please Feel free to remove post as this was not meant to be a hijack of a thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strange reply, and one which gives cause for concern in several respects.

 

Firstly, you will find that where a question is asked of which I have some knowledge I will either answer it, or point the user to where the question is answered.

 

Secondly, the issues discussed on this site often result in the user taking actions that could end up in a court, in front of a District Judge. It is therefore vital that the individual has spent the time reading, re-reading, and understanding the issues that they may have to argue.

 

I strongly resent you comments about a dyslexic. I would note that you have not made any reference to that in your previous post, and you have not suggested that this is an issue in your reply above. However, you have made a wild accusation that we somehow discriminate against dyslexics. I would add that I am always open to users sending PM's when they have genuine difficulties with understanding the process, or through any disability.

 

To suggest that a mod would "not fancy answering" is both patronising, and untrue. Admin, mods, and site helpers give their time freely to this site, and are always willing to answer questions where they can - however, the answer to the question you asked is in this thread....and part of it was posted by me.

 

I make no apology for pointing users to the FAQ's, after all that is what they are there for. Another point to ponder...how do you think those answers got into the FAQ's?

 

The answer is, that the VOLUNTEERS that GIVE their time to help others get their money back from the banks, have spent their own time researching answers to questions, and trying to keep one step ahead of the banks expensively funded legal departments.

 

The aim of this site is to empower the user - not to do everything for them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alan

 

I have sent you a pm

 

Was not trying to accuse any Mod or member on this site of discriminating but was just trying to point something out

 

Appolagies if my post offended anyone, this was not my intention

Link to post
Share on other sites

re calculating interest- I have had accepted an argument by a bank using interest at the rate charged at the highest rate to me anywhere +8% if they had not [edit] the money I would not have had to pay the high rate elsewhere it is possible using that argument to apply 38-40% apr and I think quite sensibly

 

[MODERATED: Please do not post libelous comments on this site]

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be a lot of people confused by wether the 8% interest is included in the £5k limit and it seems very hard to get definitive answer. It says in the Lawpack book that interest is included yet I was told it isn't from jonni2bad and others. Does anyone actually know?

 

You are quite correct - however the lawpack isn't.

 

We contacted Lawpack publishing and they checked with their barrister, and lo-and-behold - the 8% ISN'T included in the 5k limit.

 

They have reprinted their Lawpacks and corrected the mistake (although, probably not in that order ;-) )

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm intersted in claiming the contractual rate of interest, is there a spreadsheet to work this out and if so does it come with REALLY simple instructions on how to use it (yes i'm thick as a brick) as i've never used a spreadsheet before?

I've looked everywhere and tried every spreadsheet my comp will let me but no luck, i've read in a thread somewhere that some times a spreadsheet might be corrupted but i wouldn't know about that if it ran me over.

By the way i've only got open office

 

cheers Carrie:)

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...