Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC parking invoice - tesco Faraday retail park,Coatbank Street, Coatbridge. ML5 3SQ scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi there, firstly DO NOT ADMIT YOU ARE THE DRIVER it is for them to proove you were the driver, all you have had is a invoice for breach of contract between you and the land owner, it is for them to proove you were the driver, they will threaten you with all sorts but take no notice, bailiffs is scare mungaring tacktic to make you pay DON'T they have to take you to court to win the case before bailifs are innvolved, if they do take you to court which is highly unlikley all you have to say is who was the driver in breach of the contract? just because i am the registerd keeper does not mean i was driving at the time, it like, i have a bottle of milk in the fidge but don't mean i have a cow in the garden. when they throw the\case out claim costs. before you go to court ask for a copy of the defence and statements, (you are entitled to them) that surport there claim, they have no gounds, your not worh fighting with, they no this, it is easy to scare others that will pay. let me know how you get on.

Edited by disputeyourticket
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there, firstly DO NOT ADMIT YOU ARE THE DRIVER it is for them to proove you were the driver, all you have had is a invoice for breach of contract between you and the land owner, it is for them to proove you were the driver, they will threaten you with all sorts but take no notice, bailiffs is scare mungaring tacktic to make you pay DON'T they have to take you to court to win the case before bailifs are innvolved, if they do take you to court which is highly unlikley all you have to say is who was the driver in breach of the contract? just because i am the registerd keeper does not mean i was driving at the time, it like, i have a bottle of milk in the fidge but don't mean i have a cow in the garden. when they throw the\case out claim costs. before you go to court ask for a copy of the defence and statements, (you are entitled to them) that surport there claim, they have no gounds, your not worh fighting with, they no this, it is easy to scare others that will pay. let me know how you get on.

good site keep it up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To All

 

just for resurance, ignoring these letters and threats, is this something that everyone would do. please can you let me know for a peace of mind.

 

Once again I thank you for all your help and advise,

 

Regards

 

Hi there,

 

You should read some of the different pages, alot of people have done nothing and ignored the letters resulting in UKPC giving up on them.

 

I am currently on my 2nd letter, I am not entitled to my 50% discount anymore :p

 

I was due a letter this morning, but nothing has come so I guess I'll be getting one Monday. I know the letters are big red and frightening but stick by it.

Even if it does go to court, there are a lot of people to help you through it if it ever gets that far. And from what I've read, UKPC have gave up before its got to that stage ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

thank you for your help, I'm sorry of I sound very nervious its just that I'm fed up with all these companies [causing problems] and robbing innocent perople. espically with out understanding and justice.

 

just a query if I go shopping again and car my in the retail car park which is being monitered by UKPC. if the UKPC notice my on their system as an unpaid ticket, will UKPC clamp or tow away my car?

Please advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

For goodness sake. You give them a lot of credit for a bunch of cowboys. We've seen no evidence of any tabulation or correlation of data, and under the Data Protection Act, it would be illegal for them to process your personal data unless you gave them permission.

 

So in answer to your query, ib you got 10 tickets from them, and were about to clamp your car because of outstanding INVOICES you refused to pay, they cannot clamp you (as this would be extortion).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

thank you for your help, I'm sorry of I sound very nervious its just that I'm fed up with all these companies [causing problems] and robbing innocent perople. espically with out understanding and justice.

 

just a query if I go shopping again and car my in the retail car park which is being monitered by UKPC. if the UKPC notice my on their system as an unpaid ticket, will UKPC clamp or tow away my car?

 

Please advise

 

 

This would be an act of car theft and no different to me breaking in to your car and driving it away. Likewise you could make a complaint to the Police; therefore, no they will not tow your car. As previously mentioned, clamping in these circumstances would amount to extortion. Honestly, you do credit these guys we a serious amount of power and intelligence - most of them are as thick as bricks which is why they often end up doing such a job.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there, firstly DO NOT ADMIT YOU ARE THE DRIVER it is for them to proove you were the driver, all you have had is a invoice for breach of contract between you and the land owner, it is for them to proove you were the driver, they will threaten you with all sorts but take no notice, bailiffs is scare mungaring tacktic to make you pay DON'T they have to take you to court to win the case before bailifs are innvolved, if they do take you to court which is highly unlikley all you have to say is who was the driver in breach of the contract? just because i am the registerd keeper does not mean i was driving at the time, it like, i have a bottle of milk in the fidge but don't mean i have a cow in the garden. when they throw the\case out claim costs. before you go to court ask for a copy of the defence and statements, (you are entitled to them) that surport there claim, they have no gounds, your not worh fighting with, they no this, it is easy to scare others that will pay. let me know how you get on.

 

Thanks mate I will keep you updated,,,,I have a query,,,,if I park my car in another retail car park which is monitored by UKPC, will they reconise my car on their system and clamp or tow it away,,,

 

what you think,,,,please advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

I just want to take the moment to thank you all for your help and advise,

 

This is a great web site,,,please do keep it up..

 

I appologise for repeating my self at times.

 

Kind Regards

 

Mohammed Ali

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so now we ALL know not to communicate with them..... (blimey!)

 

I should have had a visit from their 'debt' collectors well over a week ago now, still no visit, LOL

 

Does anyone know what the next communication will be from them?

Is it the letter that says they will now decrease the charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so now we ALL know not to communicate with them..... (blimey!)

 

I should have had a visit from their 'debt' collectors well over a week ago now, still no visit, LOL

 

Does anyone know what the next communication will be from them?

Is it the letter that says they will now decrease the charges?

 

once you have had this letter, a solicitors letter arrives advising you if you don't pay in 7 days, and that the costs will rise if you don't pay and that the sky will fall in on you or word to that effect, next I received a final warning 21 days after the last letter, this tells me a county court order will be sent in 7 days, that was 14 days ago, I have replied in a similar format to their letter giving them a final notice to stop this harassment, if I do receive another letter I intend to go to the police, TV and papers, as in our area, a chap, has just done a 48hr sit in his vehicle over clamping and its front page headlines, guess what the clamps were taken off as a welfare group paid the fine lol :-) ANYWAY advice to anyone getting a parking fine [problem] don’t pay incidentally my request to the DVLA under the freedom of information act for a copy of the V888/3 form has had no response as yet. good luck to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above. You will get a 'final' letter, then a 'final, final' letter (see a pattern emerging here!) The last one (but not always) offers to decrease the amount. Its basically a begging letter because thier desperate for your cash and by lowering the amount bet on the fact that you'll pay. If you do get one post it up here if you can washed of details. The posters in the forum like a good laugh! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

incidentally my request to the DVLA under the freedom of information act for a copy of the V888/3 form has had no response as yet. good luck to all.

 

If you asked for it under a FOIA they may not respond because you don't need a an FOI request to ask for information regarding yourself. Ironically therefore, although you are entitled to the information because it is about you, they do not have to act on a FOI request because the request is not valid.

 

Write to them again, but simply as the RK requesting what 888/3 submissions have been lodged against you/your car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I write with attention to the above parking notice. As the registered keeper of this vehicle I cannot be held liable as any contract can only be formed with the driver. Any further communication from yourselves, other than notification of cancellation of the ticket and any purported charges, will be regarded as harassment and reported to the authorities. At this time I have also spoken to the local newspaper about these charges whom are considering running a story about this. I have also contacted a tabloid newspaper and I m awaiting there return call.

Without prejudice

 

 

This is a copy of my letter what do you think??????:razz:

 

Hi bankbustermum, one should never put without prejudice on a letter like this as it I believe it restricts its legality in a court of law and can not be produced as evidence, can anyone else verify this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bankbustermum, one should never put without prejudice on a letter like this as it I believe it restricts its legality in a court of law and can not be produced as evidence, can anyone else verify this?

 

Yes, by writing without prejudice you are trying to ensure that what you have written will not prejudice any future legal action. For example, a bank typically makes a without prejudice offer to refund bank charges (in the cases they do). This means that you cannot claim that making the refund was an admission of guilt on their behalf. I see no reason why you would need to write without prejudice in this instance.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi newbie here, My vehicle received a 'ticket' from UKPC today, the ticket stated it was on a retail park with the street name but no town ( could be anywhere in the country) the best part is the alleged contravention. The box ticked is - Vehicle owner left side. I wonder what that means, they must rush to get their tickets printed that they don't check the spelling. I think someone at the printers either has a sense of humour or has been stung by these [problematic] and is getting his own back.

No doubt the junk mail will be arriving in the next few weeks but I want to get to the stage where I receive the phone calls from the debt collectors nothing better then winding people up like them. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have also received a parking ticket from UKPC at the Solatron Car Park in Farnborough. The ticket says that the owner left the vehicle. Well, thats true, because I was in the shops. I double checked before hand if the car park to these shops was a pay and display which it was not and so went into the shops. I then saw the warden put the ticket on my car. I asked him if this car park was pay and display and he said no. So I asked why he gave me a ticket with his reply being you left your vehicle. I said because I was in the shops. He just shrugged his shoulders and said I think you left your vehicle. I then continued to shop and left.

 

I received my first letter today. Its pretty funny as the photo is just the front of my car showing the number plate and the lights. The photo could have been taken anywhere. No proof whatsoever that I was parked in the car park.

 

Anyway, the other good news is the car actually belongs to my wife and is in her name.

 

So, I am just wondering, what is the best way to fight this?

 

Write back in my wife's name saying that she is the registered owner and keeper but was not the driver and ask them to please take it up with the driver.

 

or

 

Contest it stating that I was in the shops and that I have a receipt to prove it.

 

I kind of think I should get my wife to contest as she was not the driver as I get the feeling UKPC will just ignore my claim I was in the shops at the time.

 

Any advice would be really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Linus , I know you may think you have a problem, but did you research this topic by reading the previuos replys and threads, then you would have come to your own conclusion that you have nothing to worry about; just ignore everything, do not repond, they will ignore your protestations etc. They just want people to pay: end of: its a [problem]. Get on with your lfe and enjoy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...