Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HungerfordMan vs HSBC


HungerfordMan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First letter: Sent 17/01/2007

Reply Received 31/01/2007

 

LBA: Sent 31/01/2007 signed for 01/02/2007

 

Offered: 92.77% of claim (what i would have filed with MCOL) on 15/02/2007

 

Accepted : 92.77% offer accepted 16/02/2007

 

 

Well hello all. Im new to this site, but started my claim a while back after reading about the reclaims on money saving expert.

 

I finally sent off my First claim letter and schedule of charges to the bank last Thursday, so they have until the 31st January until my second one goes.

 

I have learnt a lot on here since sending my letter, but at the time, i claimed for all my charges, and added all the interest at 8% as well. I guess time will tell whether that was a good or bad thing.

 

So particulars:

 

First claim letter: sent 18th January

Total Claimed: £ 2260.49 ( Charges: £1817.50 / Interest: £442.99)

 

 

Fingers are now crossed , and ill let you know how i get on.

 

Thanks to all, both here and at money saving expert for the inspiration to get back money that i thought was gone forever :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC BANK PLC

8 CANADA SQUARE

LONDON

E14 5HQ

 

Is the registered address

good luck!

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well maybe HSBC are getting quicker.

 

I received a response from the infamous Colin Langdale, with a Leeds address on it this morning.

 

We are looking into it, blah blah blah, will get back to you, blah blah .....

 

A response within the first 14 day period !

 

So LBA is written and will be popped into the post box this evening :) (sent it by recorded after reading other posts !)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how long should the LBA give the bank ? I have been using templates from a different site, and just noticed that my LBA letter gives only 7 days to respond.

 

Is this okay, or is a longer time frame recommended ?

 

Secondly, in the unlikely event that the bank were to offer a full settlement, i would have to take it , as i assume i would not have an argument to take them to court and try and get interest as well. Is this correct ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give the bank 14 days to respond to your LBA.

IF they offer a full settlement, then yes you do need to accept it.

hope this helps

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that i am impatient or anything.... :grin:

 

Registered with MCOL this morning, so that i could familiarise myself with the setup.

 

One thing i didnt realise, and that is worth knowing. You can fully enter your claim now and then not submit it until your LBA deadline is up. That is really handy as you can take your time to fill in the MCOL correctly , yet be ready right on the LBA deadline button :)

 

So my claim is all entered, all i need do now is sit back and wait for the HSBC not to offer me anything after my LBA.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes hm

you can pop in and out of the claim anytime you like and check that all the particulars are to your satisfaction. then when the big day comes... you just press that submit button and hey presto - you've filed your claim!! cool aint it?:cool:

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there hungerford man reading your thread thanks to yourself and netty thats something new I have picked up on the mcol so I can look into that ready for the filling time, unless colin wants to pay up in full to pay for the new fitted wardrobes that are coming in march (may have to redesign them for a space for him) :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just popped in for a quick update.....

 

2 days to go to McDay, and still not heard a dickie bird from Colin after his fob off !

 

So , i have registered and completed with MCOL, and saved the particulars ready to file.

 

So what next, i file the claim and wait ?? Or do i have to send anything to anyone else in the meantime, or wait for the postman to bring something from the court ?

 

Stupidly thought id of got an offer by now, but now want to get another step or two ahead of the game !

Link to post
Share on other sites

just hang on - file your claim (are you happy with your partics - cuz i'll gladly send mine as another example to look at and copy), when you've filed:

if you are reading threads you'll know first the court issues the claim (you'll get a copy), then you hear when dg acknowledges the claim - at this point you send copies of your breakdown - 2 to the court and 1 to dg (address on pg 2 of acknwl) and to both you reference your claim number, then you wait - they have 28days from issue date to file a defense - you'll know by the mcol status where you are (paperwork follows each stage a day or two after the mcol site registers a change). that's about it. let me know if you want to look at my particulars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well well i dont know !!

 

Anyway, all these talk of particulars, heree have a look at mine !:p

 

Any comments appreciated !

 

The Claimant has two bank accounts,

xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx with the Defendant.

Between 16/02/2001 and 17/12/2005 the

Defendant debited charges and interest in

respect of purported breaches of contract.

Defendant is aware of all details as a list

of charges has already been supplied.

Claimant contends: The charges exceed the

Defendant's losses caused by the breaches;

The Term permitting the Defendant to levy

such charges is unenforceable under the

Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts

Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act

1977 and at Common Law. Claimant claims:

return of the amounts debited of £xxxx.xx;

Interest per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of

8% - £xxx.xx continuing at 8% until

judgment or settlement at a daily rate of

£0.xx; Alternatively, if the charges are a

fee for a service, then they must be

reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of

Goods and Services Act 1982. Costs allowed

by the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha Thursday Conundrum (sp) time !

 

Obviously we are back to the Thurs/Fri/Sat offers syndrome.

 

So to the offer, its not bad ...... given that i was going to file MCOL today !

 

The offer 1630.00, against a claim of £1815.00, although i will lose 1 months charges at filing MCOL, because of the 6 year thing, which would make my claim £1700.00, and theyve offered me just 70.00 less.

 

I also know that i claimed for one lot of £30.00 thats already been refunded, so in actual fact i make it that they are only around £40.00-£50.00 short of a full refund !

 

To take it or not to take it ....... hmmmmm im going to spend the day thinking about it , but as i ve just spotted a camper van i want to buy its very tempting.

 

Thoughts for and against please !

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was thinking the same myself - sometimes on here - you get the go get it all advice - but sometimes - i think, why put yourself through another 6 weeks of hassle - except you would also get the 8% if you file - your decision entirely - we support you either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i think i will sleep on it, and of course see the letter in the flesh, which i havent yet ;)

 

I didnt expect to see an offer which was so good which is what has thrown me. If it had been the 80-85% mark i think i would automatically have ploughed on but at over 90% , hmmmmmm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'd take their hand off

but then Im an impatient spendthrift.

Be calculating in your decision

flip a coin or summat

lol

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well i think ive reached a decision.

 

Im going to accept the offer i have had. If someone had told me five weeks ago id have £1600.00 winging its way to my account id have had them committed !

 

The offer letter is the standard, ....... fees, blah, blah, published price list, blah blah, personal banking terms, blah, copy, blah. If taken to court we would successfuly resist , blah blah, yeah right !

 

HSBC, mindful , blah, blah, so for commercial reasons and without any admission of liability whatsoever we are prepared to make payment of £xxxx.xx

 

If you accept, blahdy blahdy blah ........

 

There is no mention of confidentiality as i have seen previously, obviously they figured everyone else was just crossing this out, and perhaps they figured they could make cutbacks on ink :rolleyes:

 

Also contains information about what to do if not happy !:p

 

Might just give the "Senior Manager" a prod in the morning, see if i can get him to "up" the offer a little, out of pure cheek !:D Another £50.00 would be another £50.00 after all ;)

 

Will be back with a donation when money reaches town. Thanks to all for your advice, and good luck to all fellow claimees. May the offers be with you !!

 

For now i bid you farewell, and suggest i can be moved to the "Successes" , lord knows we need some new ones in there !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...