Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is not as simple as you seem to suggest. 1. My wife needed the car and there are no local public transport facilities within 2 miles. 2 Neither of us has the technical expertise to change a battery. 3 Not only does the battery itself have to be appropriate for stop/start technology; but also, according to the handbook, has to be registered with Mini by a recognised agent, which I am not, neither is Big Motoring World. 4 The car had to be towed. Where was I going to have it towed to where I could be sure it would be properly dealt with? I couldn't trust Big Motoring World to do it. I couldn't have it towed to just any garage and be sure they had the right battery and the time to fit it. 5 The high sum involved is mainly for the diagnostic test which Big Motoring World asked me to obtain; and they did not initially raise any objection to the car being taken to the nearest main dealer. I would not have got the diagnostic test, if they had not asked for one. So, I understand where you are coming from, but having ignored requests for reimbursement, what else could I have done to recover my lay out?
    • Thank you FTMDave.  I'm happy to make your suggested changes.  I'll wait a day or 2 to see if any of the team have any other suggestions or feedback.  Do I then just email a copies to both UKPC and the court? Lookinforinfo - Unfortunately I am not sure if the signs have since been changed and cannot recall seeing any on the night as it was dark.   
    • The US confirmed it revoked licences allowing the export of some goods to Chinese tech giant.View the full article
    • I can't imagine that EVRi will want a judgement against them on this and based on this argument. I reckon you have a better than 90% chance that they will try to reach out to you before the trial date. They know that what they are doing is thoroughly wrong and dishonest and contrary to law. They are following this thread, of course – and they've already seen this witness statement. I imagine that they are scrabbling around trying to understand how they can extricate this without using too much face. I suppose they will make an offer to you which is a few quid short of your claim in order to say that they were justified in being stupid. Hold out for every penny. It's your money and you deserve it. It's not their money and they don't deserve it
    • New paragraph 47 – If you insert that – and move everything else down then I think you are good to go. Well done on going through the mill on this but it looks pretty good
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mass complaint ;Add your name here if a dca has acted incorrectly with your account.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Moorcroft- For their empty threats

(un)Reliable Collections-For their sheer bloody minded ignorance of the law

Aktiv K®apital-For thinking that they are above the law

Wescott-What more can i say

Scottcall-Well. Nuff Said

FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE NSA USING THE PRISM SYSTEM. HELLO FROM THE UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

loopy_lou1 - HFO for terrorising me and my family - not taking me through DP and making empty threats about "charging orders against my property, calling my father by name"

 

No company I have dealt with have sent a proof of debt letter

Get a life - you only get ONE!

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/

http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/

http://www.cccs.co.uk/

 

BSC No 60

12.12.2007 - 9.54am

**Discharged Friday 12th December 2008**

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

MOORCROFT - For passing on debt whilst in dispute

 

RELIABLE COLLECTIONS - For continuing to harass me despite not being able to produce a CCA, for adding charges to the alleged account and for lying to my daughter on the phone in order to extract information from her.

 

ROBINSON, WAY & CO - For continuing to harass me despite not being able to produce a CCA, for misquoting CCA 1974 in order to obtain money from me by deception, for telling me that someone has repeatedly called at my address (when they haven't) in order to intimidate me, and for sending me letters with the heading "Where Did We Go Wrong" when they clearly know exactly where they're going wrong. Also for being stupid enough to think that changing their letter font and the colour of their headed paper will fool me into thinking i'm now dealing with the Legal 'things are really serious now and we are getting rather cross with you' Department.

 

BUCHANAN, CLARK + WELLS - For purchasing a debt without bothering to find out that it had already been struck out in a court of law and for lying in order to intimidate me and obtain money by deception by saying somone would call on me within 72 hours if i didn't pay up.

 

CABOT - For not acknowledging my CCA request and for continuing to harass and threating me with added interest should i not make a payment, and for employing ugly people with the express intention of frightening my children should they carry out their threat to come knocking on my door.

 

BLS - For totally ignoring my CCA request yet using the £1.00 to reduce the alleged balance when i clearly told them not to use it for this purpose. For continuing to threaten and harass me in the absence of a CCA and for trying to fool me into believing that they're are grown ups when they clearly cannot read.

 

AKTIV KAPITAL - For continuing to harass me even though they have admitted there is no CCA and for lying to me by saying i had made a payment (therefore acknowledging the debt) when i hadn't.

Also for attempting to confuse and intimidate me by using a number of different companies ( which i am still trying to get my head around) to deal with the same query.

They used Horwich Farrelly Solicitors to inform me that the account was being retuned to the OC (following a CCA request), i then recieved a letter from Buchanan, Clark & Wells telling me that "regards your communications with Robinson Way"??? "you will need to submit your request to the OC"!!!??? All 4 of the above companies dealt with this same single CCA request:???:

 

WESCOT - For not acknowledging a CCA request

 

FIRST CREDIT - For not acknowledging a CCA request

 

LEWIS DEBT RECOVERY - For falsely telling me on 2 separate occasions concerning 2 different debts (following a CCA request) that they are not the creditor or data controller and that i should CCA the OC and not the DCA.

 

THAMES CREDIT LIMITED - For attempting to obtain money by deception by falsely telling me that they have no obligation to provide me with a copy of the CCA.

 

ROXBURGHE - For not acknowledging a CCA request

 

I think it's only fair to say that in my personal experience Clydesdale, AIC, Connaught Collections and EOS Solutions have all acted on my CCA request in a proper, polite, respectful and timely matter.

They have never threatened, harassed or attempted to mislead me, regardless of whether they were able to produce the CCA or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

for employing ugly people with the express intention of frightening my children should they carry out their threat to come knocking on my door.

 

PMSL

 

Now I didn't realise DCA's purposely employed ugly people to recover debts.

 

What's next, John merrick working for Mackenzie Hall?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok if you wish to have your complaints specifically included send fuller details to [email protected]

I will get back to you from there.

 

Martin

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to nominate NCO (Europe) Ltd for failing to follow OFT debt collection guidelines.

 

Non-existant debt was disputed but of course they continued to bank and send scary letters. Admin of justice 1970 - no phone calls- template letter sent. (They deny recieving it in the results of the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) I sent them) I sent it Recorded.

 

Even after the original creditor finally admited there was no debt after all and it had all been an administrative cock up, they (NCO) still continued to pursue me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to report RMA/NCO for continually harassing me by phone and by letter even though my account is in dispute, as I have asked for a copy of my CCA and they have failed to provide one.

I have written to them to ask them to stop ringing me and to only communicate with me by letter but this has made no difference to the harrassment.

Also when I spoke to a member of staff at RMA and asked him to stop calling me he said 'no, not until the debt is paid, until then we have every right to phone you'.

NCO also send postcards to my house claiming to be sending someone to my house to discuss my account, although this person never turns up.

I think they're behaviour is appalling.

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

NCO/RMA - for failing to comply with OFT guidelines and the Data Protection Act, failing to properly comply with a CCA request, and failing to comply with CCA 2006 (not sending a copy of complaint procedure on request, failing to respond to a complaint - though they passed it to the OC)

 

Robinson, Way - for utter stupidity and denial in the face of facts - claiming that sending a letter on another company's letterhead and pretending it is from the other company is not intended to mislead and decieve.

 

The Credit Services Association - for failing to acknowledge the unethical and irresponsible way its members routinely operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcroft - notified me of action they had no intention of taking, complete with a threat of solicitors' costs (all for an account owing £25!). Ignored CCA request, simply paying the £1 toward the account in question.
=andena son being harressed by Lowell and red for 13 year old debt.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Equidebt - C/o abbey and cahoot - rung my parent's home and intimidated them into paying or else going to prison - on christmas eve!

 

Buchanan Clarke&Wells - chasing an alleged debt from Hutchinson 3G, no deed of assignation, and no proof af the debt even existing.

 

Global Vantedge - C/o MBNA - calling all contact numbers 4 times a day, and coming out with such jems as 'all this can end if you pay now' and 'we are not in the uk, so do not need to follow british law'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

cabot/ruthbridge- constant letters threatning allsorts and non CCA compliance.

wescot/credit security limited- constant demands for payment of the same debt.

red castle recoveries- 5 phonecalls a day for a £95 debt they can't enforce because they don't know my address!! and they expect me to confirm it when they call!?!

incasso-came to payment arrangement with them but have to phone weekly to do this. lines are so busy you have to leave your name and number so they can phone back been doing this for 6 weeks now never been called back now received a letter saying i've defaulted on the arrangement?!

 

all these DCA's have been fended off with letters provided by this site plus a few emails to consumerdirect, trading standards and a nice little thing called 'choose to refuse' from BT suddenly it's gone very quiet!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to add Fredrickson International. Non compliance with the CCA request I sent. No contact between 5 July and 2 weeks back giving me 7 days to pay up or they would take me to court. They also doubled the debt with their charges. When they phoned me Fed Intl told me it is MY responsibility to prove I don't owe the debt NOT theirs. There is no credit agreement, I did not sign one for this debt, had the debt stayed with the original creditor I would have no problems paying it. I have now received another letter saying this debt will not go away, so much for taking me to court, Trading standards are on the case now. Thanks to the help on here I now know that I was told a pack of lies from Fed Intl. Thank you so much for the help.:)

 

How do I add this to the main list please?

I am also using BT choose to refuse, makes life so much easier

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

This a BOS CC debt - 16 years old. interest was frozen then and monthly payments were setup to BOS.

4yrs later it was dealt with by their solicitors, then transfered to Blair Scott Oliver to collect right up to 4 months ago.

At this point BCWGroup took it on with nasty phone calls etc, BUT the magic words 'I DONT WANT TO BE TELEPHONED' silenced the calls.

Then 24 days ago I served my first CCA letter with the £1 payment to BCW.

No response yet BUT 15 days after serving my CCA a new DCA enters the fray, CAPQUEST send me a red demand letter and three days later start phoning daily at 8am.

During their first call I naturally asked for all communications to be in writing only but have so far ignored my request.

I have today recorded/posted cca and harrasment letters.

Lets see what happens next. The original debt was about 5k and is now 1k.

CapQuest are an unpleasant bunch of CAPital reQuesters, just look at the other posts!

H & H

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...