Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
    • oF course, this is all just the start. trump is dragging it out as much as possible hoping to pardon himself, but the barrier the yanks had about admitting that a pres could be such a piece of err work has been broken and there is many more to come. His current criminal charges are extremely unlikely to result in jail time or anything other than fines  - but with some of the other charges - jail is pretty much mandatory - especially for one not only not on a first offense - but with others stacked up
    • Indeed, it’s all up to date at the moment and no missed payments and no issues from a credit file perspective everything is up to date in that sense 
    • follow it thru, plenty of time to poss arrange a tomlin or consent later on. ............   pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. dx
    • so you've never been issued a default notice ever and all these accounts still show on your credit file?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB Scam or honest mistake? You decide


NO_Overdraft
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5831 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ask your manager when the start ot the day is!

 

I just took a look at their Online Banking website which offers up this little gem of obfuscation:-

 

Overdraft excess fee

Charges

We charge this when you go overdrawn and don’t have an overdraft facility, or if you go overdrawn above an agreed overdraft. We will charge this fee again on each day we make a payment for you that increases your overdraft.

£30 a day (maximum of 3 charges in any one monthly charging period - maximum of £90)

Returned item fee

Charges

You'll be charged this fee whenever there is not enough money in your account to make a payment such as a direct debit, cheque or standing order.

£35 (maximum of 3 charges a day)

 

 

We will write to you every time we are unable to make a payment for you, or the first time you go overdrawn without agreeing it with us in advance. We use the balance on your account at the start of the day* to make decisions on whether or not to pay cheques and other items presented for payment that day.

Please make sure you have enough cleared money in your account at the close of business to cover any payments you have made (or cheques you have written) for the next day. We pay some cheques the same day as they are paid in.

 

*The start of the day is when we start processing. This is before any Lloyds TSB branches open.

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a con.

 

my account was about £10.50 overdrawn last week for ONE DAY and Lloyds wrote a letter that they had 'allowed' a payment to go through and in future they would charge me.

 

Today rec'd statement and it says '£30 charge'!

 

The point is, this was a debit card payment and if they had refused it they could not charge me. They've refused it in the past and i get no charges, so in this instant they paid it so they could charge me.

 

Anyway, they'll be getting a letter today telling them what i think of their charges.

 

I suggest you also write them a letter detailing that charges are unfair under CCA etc and this is in fact a penalty and you are not happy to pay it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds TSB did something similar to me in June 2006. I arranged a transfer by internet banking to be paid and I was sure there was money there but somehow this resulted in a penalty charge as they said there were no funds availble at the time they paid it. I said that I arranged for it to be paid "As Soon As Possible" which I took to mean only "When Money Was Available" and if there was no money availble they should not have sent it. The reply was something like they treat Internet Transfers & Payments as "Standing Orders" and so the same penalties are incurred - so yet another £35 was taken!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just spoke to someone on the phone about internet banking. The guy checked the date and time i transferred the money that cleared the overdraft and he admitted that i cleared the overdraft excess on the same date that i went above my agreed overdraft limit and that the date of the transfer showing on the statment at the time was the same date that i went overdrawn (18/12/06).

The date was later changed to the next day because i transferred the money after business hours he said.

 

So they CAN and DO change the dates on the statements.

 

It seems i have to pack in my job and make sure i'm sat infront of my computer every day before 5:30pm comes around.

 

They really should change it so you have to clear your overdraft excess within 24 hours of going above your agreed overdraft limit.

As it is now, there could be a situation where you go above your overdraft limit at 5:25pm leaving you only have 5 minutes to notice this and to clear it!

 

If the world come to an early end, it will be because of scams like this and because of T.V. turing into nothing but phone in shows lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

They really should change it so you have to clear your overdraft excess within 24 hours of going above your agreed overdraft limit.

 

But that would be crazy, it would create a situation where consumers have some control over their own finances. You are aware aware of Lloyds' business ethic right? :razz: "Us first"

 

As it is now, there could be a situation where you go above your overdraft limit at 5:25pm leaving you only have 5 minutes to notice this and to clear it!

 

And notice how often it happens late on in the day too.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This is from the website of a bill I paid recently

 

Payment Received

Date and time:22 February 2007 00:59:05 GMT

(This is the date company x received your payment.) Form of payment:Credit Card Visa Amount credited: £xx.xx

 

below is an extract from my bank statement

 

26Feb07 space.gifDEB space.gifcompany x CD ???? space.gifxx.xx xx.xxDR

 

I have changed the name to "company x" and blocked out the amounts cos I dont want them to know this is me!

 

So the money went out on 22/02/2007 but the money was showing as still in my account and available to be withdrawn up until 26/02/2007. So if I had not realised this and made a withdrawal I would have gone over my overdraft limit and they would have got another penalty charge.

 

Isn't this illegal or something?. Don't we live in an age when you can get real time up to date statistics?

 

Since I started reclaiming charges, they have also refused my phone calls, left me on the line for 10 minutes after being told I was being put through to a special department who deal with this issue and a cash deposit has been treated as a cheque and been unavailable for days until it "cleared". Good old Lloyds TSB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

That is 3 working days for a transfer via bacs so not sure on the example above, seems standard to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are referring to the cash deposit or the transfer in my post above.

 

Re the transfer to pay the bill shown above, I have a receipt from a cash machine showing the funds still "available" in my account on 24/02/07. I think this is very misleading.

 

Re the cash deposit taking days to clear - I put cash into abank deposit envelope and deposited it in a cash machine and they treated it as a cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Being charged three separate charges for returning 3 direct debits on one day - although it is shown on my statement that I put money into my account later on that date. Also a monthly charge and interest.

How can the OFT, FSO etc allow this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...