Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Approaching Pension Maturity - have debts to DCA's - do i have to tell them?


Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a pension that is about to mature in the next 3 months. I really need to take it as a lump sum as times have been hard for almost 20 years and I am still living in private rented accommodation since.

I have 8 creditors from about 20 years ago and all these were unsecured loans. I have 3 of the loans where I am paying nominal amounts (£3-£5pcm).

I have written to the others with the 21day CCA request and they have not been able to produce the signed contracts, consequently I have stopped payments

to those companies.

If I take out the lumps sum payment (of which 25% is tax free) do I have to declare any of the above companies as creditors?

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

none of their business!!

and why have you been blindly paying DCA's on debts .

running the statute barred date to infinity for 20yrs??>>>:frusty:

stop all payments to everyone

and dont you dare use a penny of your pension to pay any debts off!!

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF!!

thread title updated

 

  • Like 3
  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Approaching Pension Maturity - have debts to DCA's - do i have to tell them?

Brilliant dx - Thanks for the advice and telling off!! They were only nominal payments, however I shall stop payments immediately.

A donation to the site will follow shortly.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

you have to remember we also post because of future readers in a similar position...it's not a telling off,

- it saves people money!!

if everyone simply stopped paying DCA 's the whole vile industry would collapse overnight

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

An update from my post 16/01/24.

 

Moorcroft DR Ltd signed the CCA letter 20/01/24.

Received response  23/01/24 stating they no longer require £1.00 fee and returned PO.

They said the request has been sent to their client (M & S Bank) and once they receive further contact from their client they will be in touch.

M & S responded direct to me with letter 01/02/24 (received 07/02/24). Saying in order to process request to complete attached form and send a CHEQUE for £1.00 payable to M & S Bank.

Also stating if we don't here from you within 14 days they'll assume I no longer require this information.

The form asks for name & address, email address, mobile number, DOB, Customer signature and date.

Also for me to tick relevant box to confirm whether i want their response by Royal Mail signed for delivery or secure email. They also sent a second class SAE.

Does this mean that the time lapsed since the DCA received my CCA letter?

Also, should I just send a CCA letter to M & S Bank and ignore the request form they have sent which looks like a bit of a trap to me?

--------------------------------------------------------

Cabot Financial (Natwest)

- I sent them a CCA request in 2023 which they were able to send the relevant information.

As a consequence I stopped paying them immediately.

They have since sent various letters and the latest states

"We regularly review Credit Reference Agencies information. From the data we have reviewed, we believe your situation may have improved. We may review your account for an agent visit. Whilst our data is an indicator of your ability to make payments, please contact us so we can understand what has changed in your situation and update your account."

Cabot (Barclaycard) - Received letter confirming they were unable to the information as per the CCA request and the timescale has now lapsed.

They followed that letter with a request to change payments directly to themselves.

I assume I should just halt payment here?

Would appreciate any advice on these accounts.

---------------------------------------------------------

PRA Group (MBNA) - have acknowledged my request and advised they will get back as soon as possible, however the 12 working days have now lapsed.

I shall advise once received.

------------------------------------------

Capital One - Have not received anything and the 12 working days have now lapsed.

------------------------------------------------------------

Once again I would appreciate any help/assistance with my situation.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if anyone fails the 12+2 working day time limit, until they comply and WE CHECK the docs are enforceable, you cease payments.

as for M&S

forget the old CCA request, as stated unless a DCA OWNS a debt, it goes to their client, in this case M&S.

so comply with their wishes 

read ALL THE POSTs IN THE CCA REQUEST THREAD FIRST

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update from my post 16/01/24.

 

Moorcroft DR Ltd signed the CCA letter 20/01/24. Received response  23/01/24 stating they no longer require £1.00 fee and returned PO. They said the request has been sent to their client (M & S Bank) and once they receive further contact from their client they will be in touch. M & S responded direct to me with letter 01/02/24 (received 07/02/24). Saying in order to process request to complete attached form and send a CHEQUE for £1.00 payable to M & S Bank. Also stating if we don't here from you within 14 days they'll assume I no longer require this information.

The form asks for name & address, email address, mobile number, DOB, Customer signature and date. Also for me to tick relevant box to confirm whether i want their response by Royal Mail signed for delivery or secure email. They also sent a second class SAE.

Does this mean that the time lapsed since the DCA received my CCA letter?

Also, should I just send a CCA letter to M & S Bank and ignore the request form they have sent which looks like a bit of a trap to me?

--------------------------------------------------------

Cabot Financial (Natwest) - I sent them a CCA request in 2023 which they were able to send the relevant information. As a consequence I stopped paying them immediately. They have since sent various letters and the latest states "We regularly review Credit Reference Agencies information. From the data we have reviewed, we believe your situation may have improved. We may review your account for an agent visit. Whilst our data is an indicator of your ability to make payments, please contact us so we can understand what has changed in your situation and update your account."

Cabot (Barclaycard) - Received letter confirming they were unable to the information as per the CCA request and the timescale has now lapsed. They followed that letter with a request to change payments directly to themselves.

I assume I should just halt payment here?

Would appreciate any advice on these accounts.

---------------------------------------------------------

PRA Group (MBNA) - have acknowledged my request and advised they will get back as soon as possible, however the 12 working days have now lapsed.

I shall advise once received.

------------------------------------------

Capital One - Have not received anything and the 12 working days have now lapsed.

------------------------------------------------------------

Once again I would appreciate any help/assistance with my situation.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX Many thanks for that. However I am reluctant to give them DOB, phone number and signature as I am afraid of them copying signature and bombarding me with phone calls going forward.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who M&S?

they should already have all those from when you opened the account unless you've moved and not told them?
then theres even more reason to do so..backdoor CCJ.

OC's dont lift signatures.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for not getting back as I've had other issues to deal with.

M&S Bank/Moorcroft( and all my other creditors were notified when I changed address, so no backdoor CCJs have been issued.

I've been paying nominal amounts on all my outstanding cards over the last 15+ years.

As M&S have not actually sold on the debt and most likely do have the original credit agreement, should I continue to just pay the nominal amount or should I try and negotiate a settlement once/if they produce the original signed agreement?

Also Cap1 have now sent me a copy of the original signed agreement when I opened up my account with them.

Should I carry on paying a nominal amount per month or look to try and negotiate a settlement?

Once again I appreciate all views on these issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The policy has now been settled. 

As Cap1 have previously sent copies of the original contract, should I try and reached a settlement with them? Also if I try and reach a settlement, should I do this in writing or over the phone?

Presumably I then ignore all other creditors who couldn't produce contracts where Ive stopped paying them anything?

Any advice is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CCA produced then you don't need to do anything other than check any communications received to make sure, no pre action protocol letter or Court claim received.   You could follow the same approach for CAP1, but that is your choice.

Do not disclose any financial details to a DCA. It is none of their business.  It is only in the event that a Court requires you to disclose your finances that you would need to do so.

And make sure all creditors always have your up to date postal address.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...