Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAMSUNG not honouring warranty for screen damage - **RESOLVED**


Recommended Posts

My mobile phone came with a 2 year warranty for repairs to screen except for that caused by accidental damage.

The screen has a problem which requires replacement of the whole screen but SAMSUNG are demanding payment.

I have contested this with their contracted repairs company, and plan to escalate to SAMSUNG,

I was wondering what I can do if SAMSUNG simply refuse to repair the phone.

I understand that OFCOM don't exist anymore; has the government replaced them with another authority?

 

Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the screen actually damaged in that is the glass broken? Or is it simply that electronically it has ceased to function?

 

Also, who sold it to you

 

I'm also rather curious to know why you think that Ofcom would have anything to do with the problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

BankFod, bought from 3 network with a contract. 

Screen looked okay to me except for the inner screen protector which bubbled up and at one point looked cracked (I think it's mad of Perspex like material). 

I may have been thinking of Office of Fair Trading. I remember them stepping in and resolving a problem with CURRYS warranty years ago

I've email Samsung as per above, lets see what they say.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The office of fair trading doesn't exist any more and anyway, they would never have dealt with the individual complaint like this. Trading standards might have done but a very long time ago. They completely change now.
The only person who will help you will be yourself – and with our help if you want.

I'm still not sure why you think that Ofcom might have been interested.

When did you get the telephone?

If there is no damage on the outside of the screen then I don't think it's possible to say that it was deftly damaged by you. I think that there is sufficient leeway and explanations that you could make a good case that it was simply some fault with the telephone

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say the inner screen, is this one of the foldables? The warranty for Samsung foldables is 1 year for a screen replacement, not 2. It is also not free, and there is a small deductible to pay.

As bankfodder states, when did you purchase the phone?

Double check that you're not double covered, normally with contract phones you'll get a warranty with your supplier as well for the duration of the contract. (even if it's not needed due to consumer rights laws). It might be worth, if this is the case, seeing if Three is willing to repair/replace the phone instead of Samsung.


 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Samsung have confirmed that it will not repair under warranty. 😕

 

Cheaper for me to sell the phone as used and put that money towards a newer mobile. 

Edited by bitemarx
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really understand. You have been asked twice now when you first bought the phone. You are first of all over 12 hours ago and yet you still haven't told us and I am getting the impression that you don't want to let us know.

Maybe you could confirm this and tell us why not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Phone was bought in January 2023. Sorry but I couldn't access the website.

SAMSUNG have not replaced the screen but they have somehow fixed it so that it looks like a new screen!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to stand by for a response because it will take a while to go back over and refresh our understandings about this.
This happens when people don't engage with this thread properly

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I don't need a response anymore since Samsung has given me a satisfactory resolution.

I am, of course, eternally grateful for the responses and the guidance from all in this forum. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to SAMSUNG not honouring warranty for screen damage - **RESOLVED**

Okay, I jumped the gun. I didn't read your post properly.

Thank you very much indeed for letting us know. If it is a satisfactory outcome for you then that is excellent. Well done

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...