Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ Dismissed - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please post on YOUR OWN THREAD.

dx

 

posts now moved over.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

My case has been stayed now for 3 years now until they applied for the lift. Surely the judge is going to question them as to why they've taken so long. I'm sure COVID will be an excuse or something.

I was just wondering. It states I have to file and serve my defence seven days before the hearing date. I'm emailing the court and also sending a copy recorded del to the court for belts and braces. Should I send a copy to Erudio too?

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pellegrino said:

thought you just joined in the conversation that you thought was relevant.

Of course as you are in a similar position to the OP here and you was asking a question in response to my post. You should be submitting a statement in response and objection to their application to lift the stay after 3 years...its not a defence you have already filed that.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a defence, File and serve a witness statement in response/objection you have already filed your defence.

IS their application to lift the stay only or strike out defence/summary judgment also ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you need submit that type of statement which objects with reasons to all 3......there are plenty here that I have previously drafted for other users.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

Had my day in court yesterday and it didn't go as planned. To cut a long story short, all my arguments were pretty much shut down by the judge.

The end result was the stay wasn't lifted and a tomlin order was placed on the debt. She instructed DRYDENS that this had to be arranged with me within 28 days.  She explained that as long as I stick to whatever is agreed then all is well. Obviously, I didn't want to pay a bean back but the Judge made her mind up. She also instructed Drydens that they needed to be pragmatic in what the arrangement of payment is with me.

She was very pleasant and it was all quite a pleasant experience apart from the result. One thing she did say was that I was given bad advice on not having a discussion with the Dryden representative before coming into court. This may be something worth noting as 'smiling and walking away' didn't work on this occasion.

So what happens now is the big question. 

These are the possibilities:

Speak to Drydens and arrange a settlement figure. Pay it. End of story.

Speak to Drydens and arrange monthly payments over a period of time.

Drydens may not agree with the court and refuse Tomlin order. If so the claim is stayed so does that put me back to square one? 

I'm just not quite sure how it all pans out from now.

The judge definitely was kind of on my side in not wanting to hit me with a ccj.

Should I contact Drydens or is it a 'ball in their court' scenario?

I just want to make sure I'm doing everything I should be but also hoping Drydens don't do what they're meant to do in the 28 days.

Presumably that will put me back to where I was.

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

so actually you won because the stay was not lifted, their attempt at getting a judgement failed.

had you had the chat that would not have been the case and erudio/drydens would have won the SJ against you.

now im trying to unravel what the judge actually suggested here?  

i think :

14 minutes ago, pellegrino said:

The end result was the stay wasn't lifted and a tomlin order was placed on the debt.

drydnes have got to suggest the wording of a tomlin order which must be mutually agreeable with you (say..£PCM for xx years? <£50PCM IMHO??) within 28 days. a tomlin would see the CCJ registered if you fail it at any time? 

now if they dont do this in 28days - the claim remains stayed and they'll have to try again in court? as their n244 failed and was not granted?

@Andyorch - is this correct if their lifting of the stay failed? 
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real threat that the judge made towards me was that if I failed to keep up with the agreement of payment then she would slam the CCJ on me.

She said the 28 days started from now (yesterday) for them to arrange the Tomlin. She did say to the Drydens rep that "they won't like a tomlin order". Presumably, they can't get their money back quickly this way.

The Dryden rep also said they would be seeking full costs (£1400 ish) and she said they needed to be pragmatic towards me when arranging the payment plan with me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your own thread

they cant inc their costs in their tomlin, they lost the set a side.

so as i suspected tomlin order within 28 days , if they dont make contact in 28 days after that you then ignore them.

they broke the judges orders let them return to court.

if they do then offer what i said, they'll ask for an I&E, fill that out, make sure you inc every last sock you family needs and things like pet ins, make it so you have very little money.

nothing gets registered on your file about this unless you break the tomlin.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

The strong advantage of being self-employed is the fact I can make it look like I'm absolutely destitute if I need to! Fingers crossed that their admin is slow and doesn't reach me within the time limit.

I think it may be worth dropping a note through the courts to the judge if time is getting on just to cover my back to show that I'm willing to make arrangements etc but have heard nothing. Only in the last few days maybe? But I'll cross that bridge if I come to it.

The judge said I'd get everything in writing from the court so I'll see what all that says first and report back.

Thanks for your help through all this. You've been an absolute star.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, pellegrino said:

The judge said I'd get everything in writing from the court so I'll see what all that says first and report back

best idea lets us check things too. scan it up when you get it

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dx100uk said:

within 28 days. a tomlin would see the CCJ registered if you fail it at any time? 

now if they dont do this in 28days - the claim remains stayed and they'll have to try again in court? as their n244 failed and was not granted?

@Andyorch - is this correct if their lifting of the stay failed? 

Yes if the Tomlin Order is not adhered to they can then proceed to request judgment.....but they would have to make application to lift the stay and request judgment.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so ...

they have to make this additional application because they failed to win the application for a SJ?

which means the CCJ is not automictically sitting there waiting to drop if the tomlin order now fails for any reason?  assuming they do knock one up in the 28 days the judge gave of course?

if they dont do a tomlin, they have to return to court again and reapply for sj?

and of course in either case of re application they might not succeed as the defendant has another chance to argue their claim?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct DX although a Tomlin Order may state that any default would give recourse to lift the stay and request judgment its not an automatic as the claim is technically stayed so no judgment ...as yet.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ **FAILED** - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.
  • 2 weeks later...

Good evening folks,

Just received the letter for the Tomlin order from Drydens. They've enclosed a financial statement for me to complete and requested it should be returned to them no later than 13/11. One week before the court cut-off date. Presumably for them to prepare the Tomlin order.

I'm happy doing the financial statement, but do I have to fill in my partner's income as surely this hasn't got anything to do with her? As everything is split 50/50 would I just split my expenditures? Or would I get away with putting the full amount of say the monthly mortgage etc? Fortunately, as I'm self-employed. On paper, I look like I'm down to my last few scrapes of Lurpak so the income/expenditure will look like there's little, if any left over.

With regards to a payment offer, how should I play this? As the judge will see this I don't want it to look like I'm taking the Michael if you see what I mean?!

I also saw that it states that costs were 'reserved'. The judge did warn them during the hearing to be pragmatic regarding this.

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Cheers

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put down the full expense of everything and inc her income too, though they cannot take that into account when demanding a £pcm figure.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX. 

What does the 'costs reserved' side of things mean? Is this something at the discretion of the judge?

What would you consider a reasonable offer would be if looking at a % of what's left?

I want to offer as little as possible without annoying the judge if that makes sense! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

<£20PCM will be fine. gives wriggle room up but not by much😎

costs reserved, means they cant charge them until the judge decides.

they certainly cant, i believe, add any costs to the tomlin sum that were as a result of the set aside attempt..they LOST.

 i think it might be useful for you to inc a letter specifically asking for an up to date statement for your loans and where each time say in the last 1yrs the amount has risen, they must give a full breakdown of what the sum is specifically form./for.in relation too.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

I was toying with around the £25-£30 offer. As I'm self-employed, my income fluctuates. Fortunately, this year's accounts look particularly rubbish which are what I'm using to work out a rough monthly income for myself and my partner. Do you think they'll request SA302 forms etc for proof of earnings? Say the last 3 years to get an average.

Yes, I may request an up to date balance as you say.

I also think I'll email the court once I've sent this off. I think it's best to cover my back. The letter I received today was dated 30/10. Then they want it back to them by the 13th. This is so they have a week to sort it out presumably. They do everything last minute! 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi mate,

The cut-off date is on Tuesday. This was the deadline for the Tomlin.

I sent the financial statement and offer to them recorded delivery which they received in ample time.

I also sent an email to the courts for the attention of the Judge just to cover my back. 

Just to explain I'd filled everything out that was requested of me and put an offer forward.

I enclosed the signed proof of receipt too.

They seem to do everything last minute so I'd imagine I'll receive a letter perhaps tomorrow or Monday.

I'm presuming if they don't sort the Tomlin order out then we're back to square one.

A judge surely can't slam a judgment on me if they fail to do what they needed to do in time.

I'll keep you updated!

I did receive my Erudio statements yesterday that was coincidental.

I felt like ringing them up and see if they'd strike me a deal!

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings!

Hope you're well. Drydens had until 4 pm today to have a signed Tomlin order back to the courts. I sent my financial statement and payment offer through, all in the timeframe required so I did everything from my side.

I have been checking the post like crazy and nothing has come through for me to sign. I have emailed the judge/courts to cover my back explaining the non-contact from them.

I contacted the courts today and they said nothing has come through from Drydens to the court regarding the Tomlin. She said there is nothing at all in the system.  This was after the 4 pm deadline

Presumably, that means it should all go in my favor as they failed to have the order in on time. I remember at the hearing the judge said to their representative that they wouldn't like it (The Tomlin).

So is it Miller time?!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ Dismissed - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.

Hi DX,

Just an update on my case. Drydens had up until 4 pm yesterday to present the judge with a signed Tomlin order.

I had completed everything that was asked of me. I filled in and sent off the financial statement and offer of payment well within the date requested. I sent everything recorded delivery and sent an email to the court containing the signed receipts etc.

I had been expecting something else to come through from Drydens to sign. A copy of the order to sign etc. Nothing arrived. No emails, no post, no phone calls.

I emailed the court/judge with an update explaining this just to cover my back.

Yesterday after the deadline had ended for the Tomlin to be submitted. I rang the courts and they confirmed that no Tomlin had been received and there was nothing on the system.

I emailed the court once again to request summary judgment in my favor on advice from the clerk of the court and again explained that Drydens had not contacted me in any way.

The next hearing is in December via phone. I'm presuming that this should all go well for me as they've failed to sort the Tomlin out.

Where do you think it will go now?

I've received nothing from Drydens apart from the financial statement they wanted me to fill in.

I'd presumably have to sign and agree to it before they submitted it to the courts.

The courts said nothing was in their system and I rang after the deadline of 4pm which the judge ordered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...