Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - vehicle on site during restricted no parking period - Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford *** Claim Dismissed with Costs awarded***


Recommended Posts

1 Date of the infringement 17/03/2023

 

2 Date on the NTK  21/03/2023

 

3 Date received 22/03/2023
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  YES
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, entry and exit photos
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Not applicable as not appealed yet
 

7 Who is the parking company? UKPC

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford, RM7 0AF
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

British Parking Association (BPA)

 

UKPC Rom Valley Retail Park-1redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC ANPR PCN - - vehicle was present on site during the restricted no parking period - Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford, RM7 0AF

Thanks dx100uk

 

I've uploaded pics of the signs from Google streetview using postcode RM7 0AF.  It was dark and I didn't see any of these signs as I parked on the right as you enter (marked with red arrow) and there are no signs against the building on that side.  The sign at the entrance is also very small so had no idea there were restrictions.

 

 Unfortunately I'm not local so would be difficult to get clearer pictures of the signs.

 

Pic 1 & 2 - Sign at entrance

Pic 3 & 4 - Signs when you exit

Pic 5 - Signs inside the carpark - Zoomed but not clear enough 

Pic 6 & 7 & 8 - Shows where I parked (red arrow) and nearest sign (yellow arrow)

Signs.pdf

Edited by wv600
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC ANPR PCN PAPLOC - vehicle on site during restricted no parking period - Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford, RM7 0AF

Thanks Honeybee13 and Nicky boy for your replies....

 

I have drafted the following snotty letter, ready to post 27 days after the date on the Letter of Claim letter(14 June), so if I understand correctly, on 11 July? 

 

Any feedback appreciated!

 

Dear UKPC

 

I have received your letter dated 14 June 2023 headed: “Letter of Claim”.

 

Now, I’m surprised people still fall for your bullying tactics……Well, sorry to disappoint, but I don’t!  So I suggest you focus your efforts elsewhere as I have NO intention of paying the sum mentioned in the letter AND I am fully aware your claim has NO basis in law.

 

Perhaps you could spend your time more constructively, as it would be wasted in this instance.

 

I shall not respond to any more of your harassment letters, unless you decide to waste the Courts valuable time – in which case I would be more than happy to defend myself and send you packing with your tail between your legs.   So please stop wasting my time and save yourself the embarrassment!

 

Yours truly,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hello all,

I have now received the Letter of Claim, see attached.  Also see my answers to the questions below.  Appreciated any comments and guidance on next steps.  Understand I have to Acknowledge Service, will do that in the next day or 2 on the back of any guidance received.

 

Which Court have you received the claim from ?

  1. MCOL Northampton N1 

If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) - DONE

Name of the Claimant : UK PARKING CONTROL LTD, UNION HOUSE, 111 NEW UNION STREET, COVENTRY, CV1 2NT          

Claimants Solicitors: NONE STATED, ONLY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE - ANGELIKA BRZOZOWSKA

 

Date of issue – 14 AUGUST 2023

 

Date for AOS - NOT YET DONE, UNDERSTAND IT IS 19 DAYS FROM DATE OF ISSUE, THEREFORE BY 4PM ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2023 

Date to submit Defence - UNDERSTAND THIS TO BE BY 4PM ON 15 SEPTEMBER

[NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING YOUR TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN ANY COUNT [an example: Issue date 01.03.2020: + 19 days  = 19.03.2020 :+ 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2020: a total of 33 days]

What is the claim for – SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF CLAIM

1. The Defendant (D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge (PCN) issued to the vehicle xxxxxx at Rom Valley Retail Park, Rom Valley Road, Romford, Essex, RM7 0AF.

2. The PCN details are 17/03/2023, xxxxxxxxxxxx

3. The PCN was issued on private land, which is managed by C.

4. The vehicle was parked in breach of terms and conditions provided by signage (the contract), resulting in the PCN.

5. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not; D is liable as the keeper. Despite requests, the PCN is outstanding.

6. The C claims £170 being the total of the PCN and damages.

7. C claims costs and court fees.  The Claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 17/03/2023 to 11/08/2023 on £170.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.02

 

**IMPORTANT** WE NEED TO SEE THE FULL POC MINUS YOUR PERS DETAILS>> NOT AN ABRIDGED VERSION**THIS MUST INCLUDE THE LOCATION  - ATTACHED

What is the value of the claim?

Amount Claimed  - 170.00

court fees - 35.00

legal rep fees  - 50.00

Total Amount - 255.00

Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? (y/N - if Y state Date too)

Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y/N + date and did you reply?

 

Letter of Claim Redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk and brassnecked for your replies.

I have submitted the AOS on the Moneyclaim website today and will post the CPR 31:14 letter to UKPC Ltd tomorrow (no solicitors mentioned anywhere, only a legal representative, ANGELIKA BRZOZOWSKA, so do I address the letter to her at the UKPC LTD address?).

At no point have I admitted to being the driver.

Do I need to do anything else at this stage?

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - vehicle on site during restricted no parking period - Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford, RM7 0AF
  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all,

I have prepared the following defence, would appreciate some feedback before filing it.  Many thanks in advance!

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of the xxxxxxxxxxxx registration xxxxxxx.  The Claimant is not in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.  

2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant as stated in paragraphs 1, 4 and 5 by the Claimant.

3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 

4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.

5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  The Claimant is also adding fictitious “Legal Representative” fees when not using a legal representative.

6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have added another line to my defence below:

7 Not withstanding the above on 29 August 2023 I made a request pursuant to CPR 31.14 for the claimant to disclose its necessary evidence in support if its claim. To this date the claimant has failed to respond to said request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also added the following:

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to evidence its cause of action and contractual costs and what loss it has suffered. 

 

The Claimant is further put to strict proof that it has sufficient proprietary interest in the land, or that it has the necessary authorisation from the landowner to issue parking charge notices, and to pursue payment by means of litigation.

 

The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the recovery or any recovery at all.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello all,

Thanks for all your assistance to date.

Unfortunately I had already filed the standard defence as per Nicky Boy's 1st reply, so did not include the subsequent comments from FTM Dave, Nicky Boy and brassnecked in my defence.  Please see attached for the defence filed.

I have also received the following in the post:

1) Small Claims Track from the Court - I've completed this and send copies to the court and UKPA with certificate of postage.  Said No to mediation and determination without a hearing.  Can scan and upload a copy if needed.  

2) CPR 31:14 Reply from UKPA - Copy attached in 2 parts due to size.  Note that they did not send details of planning permission for signage as requested.  They also didn't send a copy of the Landowner contract, only a witness statement.

3) Reply to Defence and Small Claims Track from UKPA - Copies attached

Is there anything else I need to do at this stage?

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.


1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of the registration .

The Claimant is not in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.


2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant as stated in paragraphs 1 , 4 and 5 by the Claimant.


3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by Defence Particulars the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.


4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.


5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. The Claimant
is also adding fictitious "Legal Representative" fees when not using a legal representative.


6. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any
relief at all.

Reply to Defence and Small Claims Track.pdf

Reply to CPR request.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Thanks for reopening the thread HB.

My case has been allocated to Hertford Magistrates court for 16 May 2024.   The claimant (UKPC) has to pay the court fee by 18 April.

I have to provide copies of all documents to the court and other parties no later than 14 days before the hearing.

Could someone please point me in the right direction on where to find guidance for the next step?  I understand I have to compile a witness statement also.  Any help and guidance at this stage would be much appreciated.

Many thanks in advance!

Notice of Allocation.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the guidance FTMDave I'll start working on the Witness Statement.

I have also received an email for a mediation appointment on 25/04/2024..  I can't remember requesting this and not sure where to check either.

Do I reply and say that mediation IS NOT SUITABLE in my case?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you FTMDave. I've made the suggested changes and will see if there is any other feedback before posting a final copy.  I would be grateful if you could attached the Beavis judgment as I can't seem to find it.

Do I also need to attach copies of the other judgments referenced in the WS?  And is there an easy way to find them?

Many thank in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

WS is ready and I plan to post it tomorrow, 29 April.  The court date is 16 May.

I have just realised that I have a flight abroad on 16 May....not sure how I missed this before....?

What are my chances of winning the case if I don't attend the hearing?  I see I have to inform the court at least 7 days prior to the hearing that I cannot attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Thank you lookinforinfo.

Unfortunately, on this occasion, I can NOT take my wife to court with me....

With regards to your post #70, do I need to add any of this in my WS?

Also, just to clarify, I am (was) the registered keeper and driver. 

Edited by wv600
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...