Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
    • When you post information here you will have to post it in single file multipage PDF format. Follow the upload link. However, it would be more helpful if you could simply answer the questions that we have put to you and we can deal with paperwork afterwards if we think we need it.  
    • I was trying to post all the paperwork that I have, namely facebook ad, messages between the seller and my son etc . But I'm getting the message that the files are to large. 
    • First of all please can you tell us the name of the seller, something about the van – age/year, mileage, price paid. How far away is the seller from where your son lives? Who do you take it to for this inspection? Are they prepared to give you a written list of the things that they found? This is very important and you may well have to get an independent inspection from somebody such as the AA. This will cost you some kind of feedback we expect that we will be able to help you get it back. I would say that if you have to bring a court claim – which is likely – then your chances of success are better than 95% but the difficulty might be enforcing the judgement against the seller. We will have to no more in order to give you better advice. Does it have an MOT? What is the date of it and who gave it the MOT? I suggest that you start taking pictures of all of the defects that you can find.   Also I am going to say that I believe that you came over from Facebook where you were already informed that we would need at least all of the information which I have requested above. It will save a lot of time and effort for everybody if you can simply come up with the things that we ask without too much delay
    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CPN Vanishing windscreen PCN now PAPLOC - University of Brighton


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just type no need  to keep hitting quote !!

put up your snotty letter here FIRST please

do not use email.

 

so you are not the RK?

the RK should be the one posting here not a 3rd party.

Chinese whisper errors will prevail other wise

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no template

look at other threads with letter of claim or LOC or PAPLOC in the title in this forum

so search for snotty letter here.......on this forum (search in red banner uptop)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CPN Vanishing windscreen PCN now PAPLOC - University of Brighton

Ok well had a response from University of Brighton jobsworth and seems that have to pay a ransom for the Registered keeper to stop receiving harassment letters from Gladstones and CPM

 

I am sorry to hear that this is causing the registered keeper any distress or detrimental effect on their peace of mind, Had the matter been dealt with at the time the NTK was sent to them back in October 2022 all of this could have been avoided and dealt with then.

 

THE NTK would have clearly stated that if the registered keeper of the vehicle was not the driver of the vehicle at the time the offence was committed the liability should have been transferred at that point.

UK Car Park Management - Transfers (uk-carparkmanagement.co.uk)

 

UK-CPM have responded to my email informing me that this PCN was issued by a Mobile operative and not ANPR, the operative would have checked the car to see if there was a blue badge on display (as we have ascertained there wasn’t). They have also stated to me that at no point has this PCN been appealed and no communication has been received from the registered keeper.

As a one off gesture UK-CPM have offered to reduce the PCN down to £90 full and final settlement, should you wish to accept this offer then please let me know and I can inform UK-CPM, they will not be reducing it any further.

We will not be asking for the PCN to be cancelled. As mentioned in the previous email, we feel that the PCN was in fact issued correctly as per all the signage and our terms and conditions.

 

Mark Burkill Parking and Transport Officer

 

Moulsecoomb

University Of Brighton | Estates and Facilities Management

Edited by billybobyeeharrboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

who hasnt a clue what he is talking about.:crazy:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to the University Chancellor and this chap Mark Burkill has picked up the email.

I have asked the penalty to be cancelled and we keep going backwards and forwards like a broken record and despite the university's participation in causing harm and distress to the registered keeper this jobsworth relentlessly won't give up.

However he has agreed to remove the fee, cough 'Randsom fee'  down to £90!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if the university won't help, you're back to writing a snotty letter, as above, to the PPC.

Unless you want to just pay the £90, that is? I'm not recommending this, just asking as you're starting to sound a bit defeatist and not wanting to fight.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this link to the is what I should be using...

 Received a Court Claim From A Private parking Speculative invoice??

Yes you gathered correctly HB, the registered keeper is getting worried that it will effect their credit rating should it go to court and etc etc, not really aware of the legalities and the frivolity of the claim so I am getting hounded both ends...so thinking just to cut losses and pay the 90 rather than months of this dragging on...

Still I have dealt with this before and know how much of a scam it can be.

Best wishes

 

BBYHB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a good idea to try the university.  But it's clear they won't play ball.  So you need to decide now.

1.  Pay the £90 and the matter ends there.

2.  Or write the snotty letter to let the fleecers know you would just be a pain in the backside and big trouble for them if they did do court.

Remember their bilge is not POFA compliant and they are unlikely to do court - but unlikely it not impossible and you need to be prepared to fight a court claim if necessary.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

SORRY TO BE A PAIN IN THE BUTT AND CONFUSING BUT that's just where my mind is at the moment, various life matters, sure same for all of us.

Would someone be so kind to direct me to a template for a suitable snotty letter that I can amend and post recorded delivery to Gladstones?

K regards

BBYHB

do you know what think I will just pay the 90, once all the nonsense with filling in court paperwork etc is done is probably more cost efficient then fighting this battle even though these people really re lowlife 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type stop hitting quote everytime.

makes a thread twice as long and very difficult on small screen to see your reply.

there is no template for a snotty letter

you have to search for one.

we dont nursemaid.

as for paying.

thats why you've got this speculative invoice, because mugs pay up!! thinking they are FINES, they are NOT.

1 hour ago, billybobyeeharrboy said:

I have asked the penalty to be cancelled

i hope you didnt use that word...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk THIS IS WHAT I WROTE THE UNI: please send the payment link for full and final settlement

 

 

THIS WHAT THEY WROTE BACK

 

Payment can be made in any of the following ways.

Please allow a few days for the system at Gladstones to update with the correct information so I would advise looking to pay from Monday 10th July

Payment Must be made by 17th July 2023

 

Online www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk   

 

Phone 0333 0230 049  

 

Cheque Payable to ‘Gladstones Solicitors Ltd’  

 

Bank Transfer  Name – Gladstones Solicitors Ltd  

Sort Code – 20-24-09  

Account Number – 33028712  

Reference - 104262.71025

 

you must include their reference [104262.71025] when making payment. If you fail to do so, Gladstones may be unable to allocate their payment. This may result in further costs being incurred, for which you will be liable.

 

I hope this brings this matter to conclusion.

 

 

Mark Burkill Parking and Transport Officer

 

Moulsecoomb

University Of Brighton | Estates and Facilities Management

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you use the word penalty in any reply/email to the uni...

why cant you ever just simply answer our questions. you always put up something totally unrelated that never answers the question...:whistle:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk THIS IS WHAT I WROTE THE UNI: 'please send the payment link for full and final settlement', never haver I used the word PENALTY, im not that much of a bimbo

 

And yes I realise that I am a mug but I can't be bothered to go through the whole Process again last time I had to write the court and these idiot Gladstones from a mobile phone in Peru and just wasn't worth the time and headache for 90squid, even though is daylight robbery many other things in life are unfair and this is just a  private parking scam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right.  So first question.  Do you want to pay the £90 or do you want help with preparing a snotty letter to tell them where to stick their claim?

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type stop hitting quote please...

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this.

Dear ****,

Cheers! for your  “Letter Before Claim” dated ******, received with your ref number **** for alleged parking breaches.

Please be advised that I have absolutely no intention of paying these extortionate and ridiculous made-up sums of money for allegedly breaking some imaginary contract which I never entered into and which you have not demonstrated how I personally became party to.

You do not even have the identity of the driver who had the vehicle on the alleged date of offence, yet you want to litigate against me. 

I could go on but it is enough to say that this whole claim is utter nonsense and I’m sure that any Judge would agree.

Should you wish to proceed with this farcical claim, then i will be requesting  unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, the more I reckon Lee19921992's letter is spot on.

It hints that they have messed up with POFA, without actually spelling it out, which would be very confusing for the poor dears.

If you still want to fight these charlatans, send it off ...

... but before that, can you please be clear and open with us about the driver, the registered keeper, etc.,  because if you want to remove someone from the loop then you are going to have to tell the fleecers who the driver was.

  • Like 2
  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...