Jump to content


Old Student Loans - Erudio using Capquest/Resolvecall, Statute Barred?


RobinB4nk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Consumer Action Group.

 

Looking for some advice regarding my wifes old student loans. She took out three student loans in 1996/97/98. she has never earned the threshold for repayment. she deferred her repayments for a few years maybe till 2005ish, then she stopped. There has certainly been no contact from her in the last ten years for certain.

 

She continues to get 'notice of sums in arrears' which go to her mothers house where she lived as a student. All was quiet until the beginning of this year when she had a letter from capquest saying they were instructing Resolvecall. Sure enough Resolvecall wrote saying we're sending someone 'to make a personal visit to your home', which they did and we're told she no longer lives there. Three months later another threat letter from Resolvecall about a 'personal visit', that was 5 months ago.

 

I think it time to try and nip this up once and for all. My feeling is to send a SB letter but I'm just so confused of the new rules regarding 'cause of action', I have no idea if she has ever been defaulted.

 

So is SB letter way to go? who do i send it to? and when does the 6yrs run from with regard 'cause of action'?

 

sry for the long post and look forward to hearing your wisdom!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes send erudio our sb letter from the debt collection sec of our library.

 

100's of like threads here to read

 

They pull this stunt all the time, oh it matured in 2016 and we defaulted you so can't be SB. Utter twaddle!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx Dx, I'll get that off pronto.

 

So, would i be right in thinking that due to the length of time that's passed, it would be unbelievable that either a default wasn't issued or indeed should have been?

Edited by RobinB4nk
Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet they have and drydens will write claiming its not sb trying to mug you.

 

Read up here.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Update on this,

 

Sent a SB letter on 12/10/22 and have collected mail from in-laws and we have a letter from Arrow dated 05/11/22 stating:

 

'... we can confirm that this account has been closed, as a result of being statute barred. Please note: you will not be pursued for the remaining balance on the account.'

 

On 27/12/22, we get the standard 'notice of sums in arrears' from Eruido. Crossover?

 

So has this now gone? or can we expect more hassle in the future? Also there were 3 loans with different account numbers, but on the letter from Arrow it only refers to one account with their single reference number.

 

look forward to hearing our thoughts.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if the last in the chain is the one you ref'd on your SB letter then all the ones before that will be too.

 

pers i'd ignore them for now.

 

but the ref numbers they and you are using on letters is the key here.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...