Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Need to get your DQ in - it's your opportunity to have a say in what happens next! It should then transfer to local court, who will look at the DQs and determine next actions. Fairly self-explanatory and there are guidance notes on the site here. My Asset/Link/Kearns case was reviewed a couple of weeks ago after transferring to local court and they have been ordered to provide a new CPR-compliant Particulars of Claim, Original Agreement, Deed of Assignment and Notice of Assignment. They have six weeks to comply or it's struck out. As with your case they are relying on a generic print out of an agreement with no personal details or signature. Don't give the courts a chance to make any decisions without your input and get that N180/N181 in! Your call as to whether you want mediation - given the lack of evidence from them there is probably no point as you can't mediate an account that appears not to exist.
    • FYI I've had a copy from Kearns arrive today of the DQ from the claimant agreeing to referral to the Small Claims Mediation Service and without a hearing. I am a bit wary of the two replies above from you both. Which is the most relevant and most urgent to action? I'm away from Sunday the 19th to Wednesday 22nd working abroad and am conscious there's a bank holiday the day before the deadline so it doesn't give me much time to collate and post relevant paperwork either to you or the parties involved. Do I just fill in the N180 and post?  Apologies for my ignorance, It's out of my comfort zone! Also my case seems to be over the £10k barrier?  
    • Hello,  Me again, back with more questions from my friend because she doesn't want to deal with this part of her life.  She has managed to set up a repayment plan with 247money for the next 3 months.  We have looked at her car finance and she would have reached the 50% payment in Aug 2025  She has 2 questions.  When it comes to Aug 2025 what are her options for VT, I've read a few things and honestly the car sites all seem to give information in different wording so it's hard the grasp the core facts.  If she were to just stop paying the car now, obviously they would action repossession but what is the after math, money outstanding, impact on credit file, court action.  Thank you, 
    • Resolve call have one of my ancient, ancient debts that went statute barred in 2020, I've had a couple of door visits, first one just left a card, second one I spoke to, i told her how old the debt was and she rolled her eyes, and apologised pretty sincerely I thought. Not heard anything from them since.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CDER bailiff warrant for friends unknown 2018 Leeds Magistrates Fine.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon all.

Asking on behalf of a friend.

Friday 19-08-2022 he received a phone call from a number he did not recognize, so chasing work he returned the call.

The call was from CDER Group Limited, claiming he owed money for fines imposed upon him by Magistrates Court.

He was in trouble in 2011/2012, so he asked CDER for proof of what they are claiming.

They emailed him the attached document.

Could someone please take a look and explain a way forward, for example how to find out more detail of what is owed or even if it is the correct amount?

He is more than willing to pay if correct proof and or paperwork is provided, not just a letter headed document which many could produce.

redacted_img20220819_16142627.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

That letter refers to an offence or sentencing date of 13th November 2018. Your friend needs to contact Leicester Magistrates' Court to find out the details of the offence. If he knows nothing of the proceedings against him he will need to perform a Statutory Declaration to have the conviction set aside. But he needs to do this within 21 days of finding out about his conviction. Does he drive and did he change address any time in the year prior to that date?

 

Find out what it is all about and we can tell you how to proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for quick reply man in the middle

No he does not drive

Address - he tends to live in b&b's where ever his work takes him, he does have a postal address for mail but he does not live there.

All contact so far has been through mobile phone calls and email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. Friend needs to contact Magistrates court and find out why he received the fines.  If he did not receive the summons for the original hearing, he could submit statutory declaration explaining that he constantly moves around to find work and did not receive the summons to attend any hearing and to request a new hearing take place.

 

At least he may then have fines without the enforcement charges.  But it may be worth your friend contacting Citizens Advice local to where he is now, once he knows what the offences were that led to the fines.

 

Is your friend working cash in hand and not registered to pay taxes ?  If, so they might want to be careful. Questions may be asked about the work he is doing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CDER bailiff warrant for friends unknown 2018 Leeds Magistrates Fine.

Yes first point of contact is the court to find out exacttly what the offence was and if summons was ro previous address the Statutory Declaration might be a way, what he mustn't do is ignore it as the bailffs will caall add an extra fee a,d as is criminal can force Entry at some stage, but they much prefer to clamp a car if one is nearbyand they think it belongs to the debtor..

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

on Monday 22-08-2022,

My friend rang the Magistrates Court and explained the problem re CDER.

 

He was informed that because the matter had already been passed to CDER there was nothing the Court could help with, he would have to deal with CDER.

 

he rang CDER, checked the amount they are asking for, and stated to them:

 

“He had not got the funds to pay the amount in full, but he was prepared to pay £50 immediately and then continue to pay £30 per month until amount had been cleared”.

 

To which they replied “No we require the full amount now”.

 

My friend told them politely “Sorry no chance”. He then ended the call.

 

Before being asked, no I do not think he recorded the call.

 

I would have thought they would be happy to come to some sort of arrangement to ensure the amount is paid?

 

the question is,

he has made an offer of payment which has been refused, so what happens next?

 

Thanks for help from Man - UB and Brass

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

he was told to ask several questions

 

What was the offence?

 

What did they say when he said he has received nothing from any court?

 

What about the statutory declaration filing?

 

We did say ever to ring cder at all.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

The points you make I explained to him.

I told him what to ask about etc and to inform them of his work circumstances.

I told him several times not to phone CDER.

I am printing a list out for him for tomorrow.

If he does not follow through and get answers, then friend or not, I refuse to waste the Forums time on this anymore.

 

Thank you

 

T

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

if he got nothing previous from any court and the only knowledge of these/this fine was when a bailiff made contact...legally...

he is entitled to raise a statutory declaration.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...