Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misuse of Freedom Pass 10-15 times a month, over many months **SETTLED OOC**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have similar situation here,

 

received a letter today to fill my details, asking me to deny or accept offence...

I just wondering how deep they would dig?

 

two months as the history I can access myself, or even  back to the time when the card was issued...

 

That makes the thing much different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please scan up the tfl letter to PDF

read upload

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for creating new post.

I will post details here.

 

Last Friday I was caught by a staff by using my mum's 60+ oyster card at a station where I go there very few. That time was the last time I used that card, because it was nearly expired.

I must say how coincidence it is! 

 

When i was talked by the staff, I said to him that I always carry the 60+ free card with my own bank card together, and I always travel with my mum together, and  tap in and out for my mum first and then using my own card for myself, so that is why some times I used my mum's card by mistake.  I was just hope the staff could let me go, but of course he did not.

He just recorded my saying and my name and address and then sent me home.

 

I thought it wound just be some fine, but after I check online about this things, I found out ,it is not as easy as I thought as all. I don't know this fare evasion could result to this big problem, my intention is just to save some money for my family as I am a house carer.

 

I truly regret and shameful indeed, and , i would more than happy to pay what i should pay + admin fee for sure, and won't never do it again, and the free card is expired anyway.

 

I am a house husband , caring my child every day for 5 years since I came to London, no working commuting, unemployed, only sometimes took my child to clubs and activities, then take underground.

 

I can not recall exactly how often I used it  maybe 10 to 15 short round trips

 

Yesterday I received a letter from TFL to ask me if I deny or accepts the offences, I think we are not digging it yet.

I hope I could settle the OOC at this early stage if possible.

 

I consult with a solicitor but he told me there is very very little chance I can get the settlement, he is kind of give up for my case.

 

my thought is I can be completely honest to tell TFL at this early stage, to show them my regret, 

 

TBH, a criminal record is not very big deal for me, as a foreigner and unemployed, i do not need to work, and as UK visa is due to expired within a year, our family are planning to left the UK in this summer, so I even could not wait until the court hearing?

 

So I think that would be good for me and TFL that we could settle a OOC with a big fine.

 

But my wife has a different opinion with me, she suggests me not to say too many things they don't know yet, just offer them we hope to pay as many as possible , of course within reasonable range to reach the OOC. She also highly wanting a solicitor for my case, but since the solicitor is also very unconfident, I 'd rather contribute the solicitor fee to TFL to make it more worthy.

 

Thank you for view my story, and I  really do not know how to reply this first response, and hope TFL could consider not go to court at the very beginning.

 

the letter is attached, just ask my details, i think they even did not look my case yet, cause there are too many..

 

 

mmexport1648121248131-converted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

please remove case number from page 2 PDF.

 

you have the generic bland we want to see what you say letter saying nothing specific.

 

you write your begging letter in such a way that neither admits nor denies multiple uses.

there are examples here already concerning that.

 

what you need to understand is that if there is no CLEAR pattern of misuse, it is very difficult for them, other than by inference or your admittance, to prove it was you.  you see they themselves mention nothing specific or ONE sample charge.

 

if they do move to single justice procedure claim, additional uses are normally simply referred to journey taken into consideration (TIC) sheet, which lists them, and asks you to sign EACH ONE. you need to be smart here and CAREFULLY read all the like threads in the forum you found and posted your question in.,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

please remove case number from page 2 PDF.

 

you have the generic bland we want to see what you say letter saying nothing specific.

 

you write your begging letter in such a way that neither admits nor denies multiple uses.

there are examples here already concerning that.

 

what you need to understand is that if there is no CLEAR pattern of misuse, it is very difficult for them, other than by inference or your admittance, to prove it was you.  you see they themselves mention nothing specific or ONE sample charge.

 

if they do move to single justice procedure claim, additional uses are normally simply referred to journey taken into consideration (TIC) sheet, which lists them, and asks you to sign EACH ONE. you need to be smart here and CAREFULLY read all the like threads in the forum you found and posted your question in.,

 

Thank you! dx

I will try to draft a letter and hope this won't lead to prosecution. 

But I found it is really rare at this stage.

Anyway I will try and see what's going on.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we've had results in the last few months even for multiple use that resulted in no criminal record but a sum to be paid obviously.

 

do the PDF please and i''ll swap them over

 

put your letter up here 1st for checking?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a letter at this stage.

evidence poss later if you do get a SJP letter.

 

but yes mention you have used valid link card since.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my letter, i am really not very good at English sorry..

Appreciated for your advices, really helped me a lot

 

 

To Whom it may concern

 
I was stopped by the TFL staff at an underground station by misusing my mum's 60+ oyster card on 18th March 2022 .
I was always carrying her 60+ oyster card together with my own bank card because she knew no English and she had to travel with me.
So I carried two cards together with myself for convenience .I was using several bank cards for travelling. Sometimes I tap this card, sometimes that card, I did not pay much notice to which card I was using.
After my details were recorded and sent home, I researched and found out how serious this misuse of 60+ oyster is.
People who dodge paying fares are costing the TFL more than £100m a year, this is so terrible.
I felt extremely sorry and regret for this loss, especially for the misuse of the freedom pass, which is designed for old and vulnerable people.
I like this country a lot and respect the law and rules of the society, and I really hope I could do something to correct my mistake!
My situation is our family will relocate to another country after a couple of months and would not come back in near future, 
I am more than happy to make any number of payment TFL required and plus admin fee for my mistake, and I am begging you not to prosecute me in court.
As an unemployed man, I would like to do volunteer work if you need.
Please do consider a settlement , to save time and court costs, especially since I will not be able to receive a letter or post in my address after a couple of months.
 
I am really appreciated and respect for your time and consideration, no matter what the result is.
 
Thanks a lot!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I found here talked a lot about "pattern of misuse", I am wonder are my trips kind of "pattern of misuse"?

 

For example, I have three tube stations nearby, A, B, and C.

 

most of Wed night, I take tube from A to X for 2 hours and back from X to A.

Most of Sat morning, I take tube from B to Y for 2 hours and back, From Y to B or to Z

Other trips are no patterns at all, the the station I was caught is a quite unusual destination.

 

Is this kind of pattern to raise suspicions?but my trip are always started from A,B or C, and ending by A,B or C.

 

 Thanks for advice, I am a bit curious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stones1229 said:

My situation is our family will relocate to another country after a couple of months and would not come back in near future, 

are you indicating you are moving out of the country soon?

or is that just bad english?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and never returning?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying never, maybe visiting here for tour in the future? or maybe my son will go to college here like 10 more years later?  it could be quite a long time.

 

I am not quite worried about criminal records tbh, but still , I don't want to leave the bad record in my life, it may prevent me to visit UK or USA I heard?

 

And I do like to pay for my misuse to TFL and I truly regret and want to do good things.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you HB!

I am just wondering if my traveling history is kind of pattern misuses. Two repeating but separate routing trips every week.

I myself can't figure out anything unless they check CCTV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes CCTV is checked.  So each time the card is used, they may have CCTV photo of person who used the card.

 

edit.  Do not ask for  a subject access request, as you do not want to encourage them to find more evidence against you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not something we typically do nor do you need to do . Won't make any odds.

 

Let things run for now I'm out all day herding sheep, will tidy letter later.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I viewed lots of threads here, but have never seen any one used this "leaving reason"  for forgiveness. But I think it worth trying and it is true.

If I left the UK and didn't wait until receive the letter from TFL, will they just send the court notice regardless and finally find me guilty.

Then I can't enter UK again with this bad record.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might cause a few raised eyebrows at customs thats about it.

 

On 25/03/2022 at 11:20, stones1229 said:

I can not recall exactly how often I used it  maybe 10 to 15 short round trips

 

 

and spread over 4yrs.

 

21 hours ago, stones1229 said:

it may prevent me to visit UK or USA I heard?

nope...spent after 1 yrs 1 believe

 

i wouldn't seriously worry at all.

there is noway they'll bother with CCTV 

 

pers i'd reply to that letter (by email) to TfL.

you've just about got it right above.

 

treat it as one event .

put at the end that your visa expires xxxx date.

 

On 26/03/2022 at 13:43, stones1229 said:

I like this country a lot and respect the law and rules of the society, ** and I really hope I could do something to correct my mistake!

** but i'm sorry i did not fully understand your rules that i was not allowed to use the card.

 

keep it vague.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much DX for your advices.

I think I made a unclear expression about my mum's card's usage.

 

it is actually "10 to 15 short round trips" each month....

Anyway, hope this won't make any difference.

 

I will send the letter first to see what is going on..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

After one and half months waiting, i received an Email, and which is kind of surprising.

and I am kind of nervous cause  I have the phone number of this Investigator, Am I need to call him?

I have his landline, and even cell phone number....I am afraid to talk to him and it makes me panic...

 

here is the letter:

 

 

tfl reply-converted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So 10-15 short trips a month you say and they point to seeing a pattern of use too.

 

Short trips regardless, means nothing, still each one a fraudulent use. Multiple fraudulent uses of the same card in a clear pattern.

 

You are going to have hard job getting them on your side and agreeing to issue a written warning with a £sum to refund the lost fares and their investigation time.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...