Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aviva fraudulently processed my data without authorisation o


Titchytitch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

@BankFodder this is what i'm due to send today is this ok ive made the amendments

Thank you for your call today which I received at 3.23pm on the 2nd of June from one of your colleagues in the complaints team in which you stated that regardless of accepting or rejecting the ombudsman’s decision Aviva will continue to chase me for the money. The person who called me – you did not identify himself – also explained that apparently the person who arranged the insurance had no need to consult with a manager first to allow the insurance policy to be taken out by a named third-party.

 

As a company I would like a copy of your internal policy/procedure which allows you to set up an insurance policy without the knowledge of the supposedly main policyholder, or which requires no authorisation from them to enter into a credit agreement or contract.

I find it highly amusing that every time you contact me now you complete the data protection customer verification, where was this verification when a policy was being set up and throughout the duration of the policy not once was I spoken to.

This is a stark contrast to the sloppy procedure that you used when you fell victim to a fraudulent application in my name when you are keen to get new business. Aviva claims that all their call handlers are trained to spot signs of domestic, economic, and financial abuse so how was it missed in this instance?

To be clear, I have made my complaint to you in writing and I want responses in writing. Do not start using your casual telephone approaches me. If you are rejecting my complaint then let me have your final response in writing and we will go to the ombudsman.


I have no confidence in the way you conduct your proceedings over the telephone. It is this slack approach by which you allowed yourself to be defrauded and in respect of which you now try to pass the buck onto me.

In writing please. No more phone calls or else this will be the subject of another complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Can I also please remind you that I am still waiting on the data access I requested back on 23rd April 2021. As explained in my previous correspondence you should have all the information following the investigation by the ombudsman, I would like this information as soon as possible.

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you should be asking for their internal policy at the moment. Also, my personal taste is that I would start saying that I find it highly amusing – et cetera.

Frankly I would leave the message exactly as I had suggested and I don't think it needs the other things or the embellishments

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder I sent emails yesterday to Aviva ....the FOS hasn't responded back with the information other than the email I copied in on this thread 

I'm.conscious of the rejection that we will be sending when will we be compiling the letter as I don't know where to begin with it 

I need to respond by the 22nd June 

Edited by Titchytitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry. We'll do it – lots of time.

When is the return date for the FOIA and SAR request to the FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both were due last week but I received this email from the FOS 

I’m getting in touch again further to recent correspondence regarding your Freedom of Information request.

 

I’m writing to apologise that we haven’t been able to respond by the timeframe set out. I’d like to reassure you that we are currently working on your request, and I hope to be in a position to share our response by the end of next week.

 

We’ll be in touch again in due course. Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience caused by the delay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work in our Data Protection team and part of my role is to respond to requests for information.

 

Thank you for your letter requesting a copy of your personal data.

 

As you’ve asked for your data, we will provide a copy of the data you’re entitled to in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018, which relates to your complaint.

 

In order to keep the information as secure as possible, we generally send information electronically by uploading everything to a free, secure online file-sharing portal, which only you and our team will have access to. Please note that you will not need to pay for the information. We’ll send you an email with a link to the documents when they are ready. You’ll then be able to download and save the files.

 

A copy of our privacy notice for consumers, which explains how we process and share your data is available here.

 

Under the General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018 we have one month to process your request. So we’ll be back in touch by 28 May 2021.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I would send them a message immediately and tell them that they have not met their 28th of May deadline and in any event they have breach their statutory duty.

You want a reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder response from FOS

Thank you for your email.

 

Further to our previous communications about your subject access request, we’re getting in touch to let you know that we won’t be able to provide you with the information within the timeframe we initially sent out. Unfortunately your request has come to us at a busy time and due to the increase in the number of requests we received, we haven’t been able to process your request as quickly as we would have liked or within the one month timeframe.

 

We are sorry for any inconvenience caused and we are working through the requests we have received as quickly as we can. We will be back in touch in the next three weeks to either let you know we have finished processing your request or to provide you with a further update.

If you are unhappy with this response, you can make a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office. Their helpline number is 0303 123 1113 . You can also report concerns to the ICO online via their website: https://ico.org.uk/concerns/handling/

Once again we are very sorry for the delay in sending your information to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note we can wait a bit longer.

Can you remind me of the decision date for the FOS please

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - no hurry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Given delays in responding to the SAR,  maybe suggest to the FOS that they need to set a new date to reject the decision.  Perhaps they should add 3 weeks.

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a good idea.

We will draft a letter to send to them on Monday. Even if they refuse to extend, it will certainly be a bit ironic in view of the fact that they have extended their own deadlines

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear Sir/Mdm

Reference number XXX – extension of deadline to respond to FOS decision

As you know, you have been kind enough to extend the deadline for my response to your decision until XXX date.

However, I have sent you a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act and have received a response from you that you need an extension of time until XXX date.

Additionally, I have sent you a Freedom of Information Act request and in respect of that, you have already exceeded the statutory deadline but I have now received a message saying that you need extra time.

I needed this information to which I have a statutory entitlement in order to decide my response to your decision.

As you are apparently not able to provide me with the information I need within the normal statutory timeframe, I would be grateful if you would agree to give me a further extension until such time as I have received all the information I have requested from you and have had time to consider it – probably an extra 14 days.

I should also point out to you that I have made a Subject Access Request to Aviva insurance and they have asked for a three months extension to XXX date. This is also causing difficulties in framing my response.
The Aviva data protection is apparently because it will take them at least this amount of time to compile the data. I have pointed out to them that this is surprising because as they have recently been participating in the complaint that I have made about them to the financial ombudsman service, I would have thought that all the data was already organised and in one place and would not need any more processing.

I have not received any response from Aviva on this point.

 

Anyway, I'd be grateful if you could give me a further extension until such time as all statutory data requests made to your office have been satisfied – plus time for me to process it.

Yours faithfully
 

 

Oh how we laughed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 days might be pushing it – and don't forget we are asking basically for an open ended extension which is based upon their own satisfaction of your statutory requests.

Frankly I'm sure they won't like it and it wouldn't surprise me if they come back with an answer which refuses you and says that it doesn't depend on them it depends on an Aviva. Maybe I'm being too pessimistic. We'll see.
If you are happy with it all then I suggest that you send it on Monday.

Brilliant idea from my site team colleague @unclebulgaria67

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have other contact email addresses within the FOS then send them as well. As always useful to make sure that an addressee knows that there are other recipients of the same message – especially when they are likely to be a bit touchy about this kind of thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...