Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need some advice on taking my insurance company to court


gwebstech
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 813 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Ive had a night mare with a bath leak in a rented house, and Axa using BVS to assess it. They blatantly lied about my claim, so obviously that i took pictures and asked them to show me where this alleged damage is.

 

ive read another reviewer saying that he applied got GDRP data from BVS and it helped his claim no end.

 

Can anyone tell me how i apply to get this data from them ?

he said it was GDPR but im not sure if thats the right data i need or not

 

thanks

 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

 

I emailed this on the 11th and they havent even replied at all, does the ICO even do anything about non compliance?

 

Theres just no help for people trying to get something done about companies like these, its really annoying

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you send the SAR, was it by e-mail, post or both?

 

Apologies I see that you wrote that you e-mailed it. Did you receive any response at all to your e-mail, even an automated one, also which e-mail address did you send it to?

Edited by FruitSalad1010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever received a reply after corresponding using that e-mail address, indicating that it is monitored and responded too?

 

While I think it is very likely your SAR has so far been ignored and will be, the statutory deadline to respond does not expire until end of day tomorrow.

 

Unfortunately there is still plausible to consider they may not have received your SAR, although this is unlikely.


In order to make this a slam dunk and I would send a signed SAR in writing to their address with proof of postage. I would also scan a copy of said document and send it to them to their e-mail address indicating they will receive a written copy and ask them why they have not responded to your e-mail on 11th October 2021.

I think when no reply is received to a SAR via e-mail it is preferable to do this after a couple of days in order that you don't end up extending the statutory deadline by several weeks.

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, ill print it and send it

 

im in no rush, these people are absolute **** and need to be brought to heel. Ive even considered suing them myself for the loss ill suffer when repairing my water leak claim

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

An update, I contacted Axa to get a FOI request too, they said they would send it and i mentioned that BVS hadnt replied and it didnt look good on Axa. They said they would send all BVS info as they were the data controlller? I questioned that and said that surely BVS should be sending me everything from their end- ie internal emails etc. BVS work with multiple big insurers so how can Axa possibly send me all the info im asking for. Axa havent replied but they obviously spoke to BVS about it.

 

That was yesterday and today i got a reply to my email to BVS from the case manager who was sorting out my insurance claim. She said if i had any queries to send them to Axa. This seems ridiculous to me, theyre obviously trying to hide as much info as possible. BVS dont even have someone dedicated to sorting out these kind of requests but they must store peoples data, so surely must be bound by the ICO?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

I recently was insured on a rented property and the insurers refused to pay put on a leak in the bathroom. The assessors they used specifically stated that  there would be no payput as "the tenant had advised there was a hole in the bath when they moved in, and the landlord hadnt  done enough to repair the hole". The insurers specifically used this report to deny paying a claim. I am refusing to be ripped off by my old insurers and their scammy assessors, soive got nothing to lose by taking them to court. The fees are only £115 and the claim will be between 1-2k.

 

There is no hole in the bath, its a chip that the tenant covered with silicone. If an assessor cant see there is no hole in the bath then its clear that they didnt look and they didnt look because they had no interest in paying the claim anyway.

 

So, my question is - how can i best word my claim for the court? im assuming i should go along the route of breach of contract? can anyone give me any idea of anything useful i need to put into my claim so i ahve the best chance of winning?

 

Any advice will be very gratefully received and hope fully this will give other people the confidence to not take these scam insurers refusal to pay genuine claims.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have evidence that whatever was described as "a hole in the bath" when your tenant moved in was not a hole through which water could flow?  Was this noted in an inspection by an agent on your behalf? If so, what does the agent say? Has the actual source of the leak been identified?

 

Before going to court does your insurer have a complaint or appeal process? Have you put forward your evidence to challenge the assessor's conclusion?

 

Have you considered the relevant Ombudsman?

 

It would be a breach of contract claim - in respect of the contract of insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged. for full history

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mantis shrimp said:

Do you have evidence that whatever was described as "a hole in the bath" when your tenant moved in was not a hole through which water could flow?  Was this noted in an inspection by an agent on your behalf? If so, what does the agent say? Has the actual source of the leak been identified?

 

Before going to court does your insurer have a complaint or appeal process? Have you put forward your evidence to challenge the assessor's conclusion?

 

Have you considered the relevant Ombudsman?

 

It would be a breach of contract claim - in respect of the contract of insurance.

 

Hi

 

I look after the house myself, i only found out that the insurance company werent going to pay becuase of what the tenant said after i did a SAR. The leak was either from one of the pipes under the bath or the bath moving and water getting in, either way it was definitely not because of what Axa/BVS claim

 

Its blindingly obvious its not a hole so how they are so stupid or pig ignorant to deny a claim because of it staggers me.

 

I had considered the ombudsman, but after i made a complaint to them for an issue my dad had with being ripped off for boiler insurance i dont think ill ever bother again. They were useless. ive had the final word from my insurers, they told me to complain to the ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you contact AXA claims manager advising that you think you need to issue a County Court claim against them due to them declining a claim based on wrong information.

 

Give them say 48 hours to come back to you or you will start the Court claim process, issuing a letter before claim and then follow through with issuing the claim if necessary.

 

I think it is worth having the phone conversation with the claims manager first if you can and to record the call or send them an email to confirm the conversation you had, plus what you expect of them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...