Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
    • Thank you. I will get on to the SAR request. I am not sure now who the DCA are - I have a feeling it might be the ACI group but will try to pull back the letter they wrote from her to see and update with that once I have it. She queried it initially with 118 118 when she received the default notice I think. Thanks again - your help and support is much appreciated and I will talk to her about stopping her payments at the weekend.
    • you should email contact OCMC immediately and say you want an in person hearing.   stupid to not
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Goldsmiths University/Breachers claimform - old UNI fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Demands for the money have been delivered. I have requested the contract or agreement on which the demands are based and these have never been delivered.

 

Many thanks for your help

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Then put them in the CPR 31.14 request...disregard not being in their particulars...you can deal with that in your defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a copy here of your CPR31.14 in PDF format and I will check your wording.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I will run over it later this evening then you can get it away.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1: The contract or agreement and general terms and conditions incorporated in the contract. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be served separately as stated within your particulars which you failed to deliver and the original(s) should be available at the hearing.

 

2: Notice of Assignment if one has been made N/A

3: The Default Notice N/A

4: Statement of Account

5: Any other documents related to or mentioned or relied upon in the Particulars of Claim

 

Remove the above in Red...rest is fine just a little tweaking.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of what not appearing on your credit file ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a uni enrolment fees debt it wont appear on credit files, there is no 'credit'

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thanks, that makes sense

 

I’ve done MCOL and sent the CPR31:14 first class signed for and have photos of the envelope and proof of posting. 

 

Do I draft the defence now please? I’ve read everything I can find searching for the terms mentioned above and can’t find much in terms of how cases have gone post claim form being issued. Is it that I am not looking back far enough? 
 

Many thanks for all the help

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Do I draft the defence now please?

 

No.........by Friday 22nd October 4.00pm. You have 33 days in total from the date of the claim form when defending in ful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

the basics are  here:

 

youll need to mix in our std holding/no paperwork  defence too

 

bit busy. have a go and well check it 1st

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Just read that defence and this is what I have as my draft:

 

I am concerned as I'm already potentially late - that I should just get something submitted asap?

 

I have previously been contacted by STA Debt Collectors regarding this amount which they claim is owed to Goldsmith’s University.

 

I have by phone and in writing by email on 19th November 2020 requested that STA provide evidence of the amount owed in the form of a signed contract or agreement and any terms and conditions incorporated which apply to this claim. I have to date not received such documentation to prove that I owe this amount.

 

I have received notice of the County Court Claim without having received any Pre Action Protocol documentation such as a signed contract/agreement.

 

Further on 28th September 2021 I issued a CPR 31.14 Request to Michael Ronald Oatham of Brachers LLP Solicitors requesting the same information. The CPR 31.14 request was delivered on 1st October 2021 by Royal Mail Signed for Post tracking number GQ-redacted-GB.

 

To date I have not received a reply to this nor have I received any documentation evidencing the validity of the claim from Brachers LLP or any other party.

 

On the basis that STA and Brachers LLP acting on behalf of Goldsmith’s University have not produced a signed agreement or contract to prove that I owe this amount I dispute the claim in full.

 

Notwithstanding the above the claimant is invited to disclose all relevant documents in connection to its claim and on which its claim is based. Pursuant to CPR 16 and PD 16 any claim for monies based on a contract/agreement must be disclosed and the original signed contract /agreement are available for any hearing.

 

I will be out of the country from 28th October 2021 until 13th November 2021 but can be reached by email and telephone. Contact details redacted

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also added this paragraph at the top.

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must answer each of these point by either admit/deny/noted

 

1.The Claimant claims the sum of £1117.00 in respect of tuition fees, details of which have been delivered to the defendant.

 

2.Payment has not been made and the Claimant therefore claims

- 1. The sum of £1117.00 being as the sum due.

- 2. Costs

 

3.The claimant has complied with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims dated this 20/9/2021.

 

4.The Claimant claims interest under the section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% a year from 07/03/2017 to 20/09/2021 on £1117.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.24

 

 

you also need to add a bit about non compliance with the pre action protocol

 

The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

dont rush and file non cpr compliant defence just because of a dead line, you have leeway as a litigant in person, get it right rather than make a pigs ear of it and harm you later.

 


 

24 minutes ago, ChocolateFrogCookie said:

I will be out of the country from 28th October 2021 until 13th November 2021 but can be reached by email and telephone. Contact details redacted

dump this not important yet

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

look at the format andy has used

 

 

Calderdale College Defence..pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, re-drafted:

 

1.The Claimant claims the sum of £1117.00 in respect of tuition fees, details of which have been delivered to the defendant.

 

2.Payment has not been made and the Claimant therefore claims

- 1. The sum of £1117.00 being as the sum due.

- 2. Costs

 

3.The claimant has complied with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims dated this 20/9/2021.

 

4.The Claimant claims interest under the section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% a year from 07/03/2017 to 20/09/2021 on £1117.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.24

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. It is denied that details of the tuition fees have been delivered to me. It is denied I entered into any form of credit agreement with Goldsmith’s University.

 

2. It is denied any sums are outstanding or due.

 

3. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

4. It is denied the claimant is entitled to claim interest pursuant to sec69 of the County Court Act 1984. It is denied that there is any debt outstanding or due.

 

Notwithstanding the above the claimant is invited to disclose all relevant documents in connection to its claim and on which its claim is based. Pursuant to CPR 16 and PD 16 any claim for monies based on a contract/agreement must be disclosed and the original signed contract /agreement are available for any hearing.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 should be unnumbered and after your 1st unnumbered submission.

 

make 3.

Further on 28th September 2021 I issued a CPR 31.14 Request to Michael Ronald Oatham of Brachers LLP Solicitors requesting the same information. The CPR 31.14 request was delivered on 1st October 2021 by Royal Mail Signed for Post tracking number GQ-redacted-GB.

 

To date I have not received a reply to this nor have I received any documentation evidencing the validity of the claim from Brachers LLP or any other party.

 

On the basis that STA and Brachers LLP acting on behalf of Goldsmith’s University have not produced a signed agreement or contract to prove that I owe this amount I dispute the claim in full.

 

looking good to me

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up so i can check please 

not seeing andy around so ill do my best for you

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, here it is:

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of this claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol). The Claimant Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

1. It is denied that details of the tuition fees have been delivered to me. It is denied I entered into any form of credit agreement with Goldsmith’s University.

 

2. It is denied any sums are outstanding or due.

 

3. Further on 28th September 2021 I issued a CPR 31.14 Request to Claimant Michael Ronald Oatham of Brachers LLP Solicitors requesting the signed Contract or Agreement and any General Terms and Conditions relied upon for this claim. The CPR 31.14 request was delivered on 1st October 2021 by Royal Mail Signed for postal service tracking number GQ-redacted-GB

 

To date I have not received a reply to this nor have I received any documentation evidencing the validity of the claim from Brachers LLP or any other party.

 

On the basis that STA and Brachers LLP acting on behalf of Goldsmith’s University have not produced a signed agreement or contract as evidence that I owe this amount I dispute the claim in full.

 

4. It is denied the claimant is entitled to claim interest pursuant to sec69 of the County Court Act 1984. It is denied that there is any debt outstanding or due.

 

Notwithstanding the above the claimant is invited to disclose all relevant documents in connection to its claim and on which its claim is based. Pursuant to CPR 16 and PD 16 any claim for monies based on a contract/agreement must be disclosed and the original signed contract /agreement are available for any hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to add the below red text to the top of my actual defence submission please?

 

 

1.The Claimant claims the sum of £1117.00 in respect of tuition fees, details of which have been delivered to the defendant.

 

2.Payment has not been made and the Claimant therefore claims

- 1. The sum of £1117.00 being as the sum due.

- 2. Costs

 

3.The claimant has complied with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims dated this 20/9/2021.

 

4.The Claimant claims interest under the section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% a year from 07/03/2017 to 20/09/2021 on £1117.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.24

Edited by ChocolateFrogCookie
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...