Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • moved to the postal forum 100's of evri court claim threads here to read. dx  
    • if the debt was issued a DN at anytime, then it should not be showing after the DN's 6th b'day, it gets removed from credit files. SAR time? dx    
    • Why would you do a Freedom Of Information Request? Thats for public and government bodies only...    Either way, this is what happens in debt collection. Accounts sold as a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a system that contact people to pay until they give in .  They never send the original agreements with pruchase. And yes, please do name names..
    • I bought a rare collectible item from a friend in USA. I paid him via Paypal and had him send it to my forwarding address in USA. This is a business called Stackry which is essentially storage lockers that consolidate packages for you and you choose how and where to ship them, thus cutting on international shipping costs. I have done this many times before and never had an issue. On this occasion, I chose the option of Global Mail Direct. The package was picked up and handed to DHL e-commerce and I was able to track it all the way to the UK. From then on, it was handed over to Evri and a new tracking number was generated. Long story short, they lost it. The driver marked it "out for delivery" then 2 hours later "returning to sender". I was at home and no attempt for delivery was made. What followed was several weeks of back and forth with Evri through chatbots, emails and phone calls trying to locate the package and have it delivered to me. They said I should contact the sender. I explained that in this scenario I am the sender and the recipient. I did not get anywhere. I emailed the CEO and joined a Facebook group. I kept screenshots of everything. At no point did they make a genuine attempt to intercept the package or locate it or at least assure me that it's on its way back to its origin in the US. For several weeks now, the tracking is simply stuck at "on its way back to sender". They owe me £200 and I intend to get it. I do not care how long it takes or how much it costs me. I am prepared to fight this to the end. I wrote them a letter before action and sent it by tracked post to their HQ giving them 14 days to make things right before I take the matter to court. It has been a week now and I have had no response.  I have no experience with legal matters and I am hoping someone can guide me into what I should do next. Thank you.
    • Thanks Dx, Tbh, I’d forgotten that this account was the subject of a charges claim - nearly 10 years ago now! I don’t know for sure that a default notice was issued by Barclays when the account was in arrears but I would guess there may have been one somewhere in 2010. A suspended repossession order was awarded around May 2010 so I’d assume that a default notice would have been a pre-requisite. Based on the info in the thread those arrears were cleared around 2014-2015 but I don’t have any more info to hand atm since it’s such a long time ago. I believe the files I prepped for court in 2015 have since been shredded. How would the presence or absence of an old default notice help with this current issue? Thanks for the merge/support. J  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ending a call via phone rather than screen while in car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Was waiting at traffic lights on a handsfree call.

I ended it by pressing the button on the phone which was in between my lap.

 

There were two community support officers waiting at the traffic light who went onto write something down in their pad while looking towards my number plate.

Am I looking into it too much or can they issue me a fine/points for this? 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/using-mobile-phones-when-driving-the-law


If it was in your lap and you touched it to end the call, it wasn’t in a hands free holder.

 

Who knows what they were writing down, but if they were noting that you were using your mobile other than hands free : you could receive a penalty.

 

The webpage I’ve cited highlights that this applies even while “just stopped at traffic lights”.

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe (but am happy to be corrected!) that PCSOs can’t offer a FPN in those circumstances.

 

I don’t know if they then report it and the police offer you a FPN, or if they’d have to report you, and take you to court, where either or both could state why they believed the offence to have been committed.

 

6 points, £200 fine (& victim surcharge if it goes to court)

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Would someone be able to confirm. 
 

I went back to the same place as they were waiting outside a house that had been broken into and asked them if they wanted to speak to me as I thought they had taken my number down. They said no. It was the same two community support officers. 
 

Matter finished? 
 

 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my iPhone kept on auto quoting when I hit reply. 
 

I have no idea what that S172/NIP is. Quick google suggests it’s a notice of intended prosecution. 
 

Surely if they wanted to prosecute the community officer would have told me when I asked him? Can they lie to you? Why would they want to do that? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may not be lying. They may have taken down the car’s details and not know it was you.

 

Or, they may be making a report and not want to get in an argument with you.

 

Or, they may not have been taking down your car’s details and you are just overthinking all of this.

 

Only time will tell. No one here can tell you for sure.

 

if you had no idea what an NIP is, you might have been better to ask “what’s an NIP” (though googling it, as you have done now was probably a better option) rather than asking “can I get points through an NIP”!

 

If you are that worried about getting points (do you have points already or are you a ‘new driver’?) you may find yourself less stressed if you don’t commit moving traffic offences …….

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few points to note.

 

1. There is talk of issuing a FPN. That is not the procedure for a mobile phone offence. Once the driver has been identified, a Conditional Offer of a Fixed Penalty might be made (if appropriate). That is different to a FPN.

 

2. You will note that such an offer must be made to the driver. Whoever witnessed this alleged offence does not know who was driving. So in order to find out the police must issue a request under s172 of the Road Traffic Act to the Registered Keeper.

 

3. Most importantly, in order to prosecute the driver successfully (should he decline a Fixed Penalty offer) the police must prove that the phone was being used for "interactive communication." This is as a result of the High Court judgement in the case of Ramsey Barreto vs DPP.:

 

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/19-07-31-DPP-v-Barreto-Ref.-CO2702019-Judgment.pdf

 

From your description, they may have some considerable difficulty doing that, so the rest becomes somewhat irrelevant.

 

BTW a "NIP" is a Notice of Intended Prosecution. Where the driver was not stopped at the time of the alleged offence, certain offences require such a notice to be served on either the driver or the Registered Keeper within 14 days. As far as I can remember, a mobile phone offence is not one that does. I'll check and come back if I'm wrong.

 

 

Edited by Man in the middle
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Man in the middle thank you for your reply. That is comforting. 30 years of driving at 70-72mph on the motorway it would have really stung to get 6 points for something as silly as this. Especially as it was through handsfree. 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Barreto is currently “good law”, although there are plans to close some of the “loopholes”

 

Indeed Bazz. But it's been over two years since the judgement and nearly a year since the "consultation" was launched. I suppose they must be busy but quite why they need a "consultation" is mysterious. The problem was readily identified by the High Court and it should take a government lawyer a fairly short time to produce an amendment to the statute. I suppose one saving grace is that not many people seem to know of Barreto (yet) which I must say surprises me a little in this day and age. But the DfT needs to get its backside into gear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, axil23 said:

Man in the middle thank you for your reply. That is comforting. 30 years of driving at 70-72mph on the motorway it would have really stung to get 6 points for something as silly as this. Especially as it was through handsfree. 
 

 

 

its not 'silly' regardless of the hands free operation of taking the call , strictly speaking you should not be operating your phone....there are no exceptions....even stationary at traffic lights, the car is running, the key is in the ignition. your past good behaviour by sticking to any speed limit is totally immaterial and has zero bearing upon your actions and oh i should be allowed as i'm a good boy ...usually...... why not  learn how to use your handsfree device properly to terminate a call...might be the answer.

 

your phone should not be in your lap, it should be secured in a holder whereby you do not need to access it..

 

please be careful and thoughtful  for everyone,.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...