Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Boris Johnson, former Prime Minister


Recommended Posts

The interview hasn't gone down well and people are comparing it to the Price Andrew interview with Emily Maitlis. Maybe they thought Laura K would go easy on them.

At least one news organisation that received libel threats from Mone and Barrowman's lawyers is talking about suing them for the legal costs they incurred for dealing with the threatening legal letters.

 

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a Government caught out by a pandemic with insufficient supplies of essentials, inviting anyone to offer quotes with fast track decision making for VIP's, then it is no surprise that some of contracts agreed ended up being poor value for money.

Governments who throw money around in an attempt to resolve problems they partly caused, are seen as fools to make money out of.

I predict that most of the current investigations into alleged crimes will eventually be dropped, on the basis that the Government agreed the terms of contracts.

 

  • Sad 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the Government may say that due to volumes of PPE, it was better to have increased number of suppliers and not to rely on smaller number of specialist suppliers who may rely on existing crowded markets for the supplies ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

But the Government may say that due to volumes of PPE, it was better to have increased number of suppliers and not to rely on smaller number of specialist suppliers who may rely on existing crowded markets for the supplies ?

Really ! Phuut.

Cake shops, rat catchers, pub landlords and companies created with no expertise, experience or supply chain (other than a contact in alibaba we could all email) in PPE whatsoever while ignoring existing suppliers with stock and supply chains of verified and cheaper product? - who then were forced to sell their products to the EU

Get real @unclebulgaria67 theres devils advocate and then theres total horsecrap

- unless you want to give us a couple of examples of properly evaluated VIPals? with a comparison to the rat catchersd, pub landlords, and companies created a day before - or even after they were promoted by some profiteering crony?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michelle Moan seems determined to take everyone down with her. She's accused Gove and Sir Chris Wormald of buying five years' worth of PPE when it was only meant to be four months. [Why only four months?]

She's saying Sunak will make large amounts of money out of his Moderna shares now Moderna has teamed up with HMG.

Jim Bethell is denying that he knew all about her connection with Medpro. And a miracle has happened - he's unearthed a message from late 2020 when he said he'd lost all the messages from that time with his phone.

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How Mone tried to get The New European to shut up. They're thinking of taking her to the small claims court for the legal costs they incurred for publishing things she now says are true.

 

WWW.THENEWEUROPEAN.CO.UK

The lying baroness’s web of deceit has been revealed after her disastrous Laura Kuenssberg interview

 

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I wonder who elevated the baroness to a peerage?
Ah yes, step forward Call me Lord Dave
Says all you need to know about his judgement when calling on Israel to surrender 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So @theoldrouge what do you think it says about the IDF when they murder three of the escaped hostages who were stripped to the waist to show they were unarmed and holding up a white flag - after writing on the building they were escaped hostages who needed help?

Let alone that they then chased the unarmed one who wasn't killed in the initial hail of fire, and murdered him while he was begging for his life ?

 

 

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would that be the Nolan code?

When did that change from dancing, prancing and romancing to lying, evading and obfuscating?

 

So who remembers Sunaks pledges of "integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level"

... which he immediately and repeated trashed.

 

 

WWW.PRESSREADER.COM

Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting responses from the lawyers - Only one apologised for being 'misled

"“I neither knew nor had any reason to believe that my client was not telling me the truth and wrote to your title in good faith … My client was also a member of the House of Lords and had therefore been deemed trustworthy by the state. I was therefore entitled to start with the assumption that she would not mislead me.

“To the extent that I unintentionally misled your colleagues and title, I offer my unqualified apology. I am a devout Christian, and hold to the values of truth and integrity as faithfully as I can.”"

The others pleaded 'the filth err fifth' effectively:

err cant say owt cause its client privileged and lying in such cases is 'nothing wrong'

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Jonathan Coad, who represented former Tory peer, says sorry for unwittingly misleading the media

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a security issue, where WhatsApp have had to remove messages ? But will the Inquiry be able to find out exactly what happened? If national security interests are involved, we may never find out.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't get is if national security is involved, why didn't Johnson's old phone go to the security services to be reopened?

The way it sounds is that his team chose some 'experts' and then reported back to the inquiry that they couldn't find anything. If I'd been Lady Hallett, I'd have considered commandeering the phone. :)

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seem to be forgetting the whats-app self-deleting messages introduced to politicians (allegedly) by Sue Gray

.. before any 'hard reset' or 'north sea reset'

 

Isn't that what these are referring to?

"But searching for the exchange, she found not only that it seemed to be missing but that she could find no messages to or from Johnson between March 2018 and March 2020."

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of points - which only one of her lawyers seems to have taken note:

 

Fast forward to 25 November 2019.  Solicitors are now subject to a rule which says:

“You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).”

 

Many different behaviours may be considered dishonest. Some examples include:

  • lying to, or misleading someone, such as telling a client that their case is going well when it has failed
  • helping other people to act improperly, such as by giving credibility to a dubious or suspicious investment scheme run by others

 

Principle 4 requires you to act with honesty. While someone acting dishonestly can be said to be acting without integrity, the concept of integrity is wider than just acting dishonestly.

The courts have made clear that the standard of honesty required for solicitors is that they may be "trusted to the ends of the earth" (Bolton v Law Society [1993] EWCA Civ 32).

 

https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/general-dishonesty/

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems/fraud-dishonesty/legal-threats-solicitor/

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats teh way i read it.

Perhaps the others were thinking 'old school' where they could largely say owt as long as it wasn't actually in litigation/court but:

 

"The new rule is totally unqualified.  On the face of it, no mens rea is required – inadvertently misleading the court is a breach, regardless of how much care you took to try to avoid that.  The words “your client [or] the court…” are meaningless as the addition of “or others” means that the effect of this rule is that you cannot mislead anyone. In addition, unlike previous iterations of this rule, it is not limited to statements made during the course of litigation; nor even in the course of practice.  "

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mone says it's 'laughable' that the New European should sue her for lying.

NEWS.SKY.COM

Representatives for Baroness Mone say it is "laughable" that the New European is seeking to sue her in a row over its coverage of the PPE...

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange when she seemed quite eager to dishonestly use lawyers against honest people telling the truth eh?

Just like trump and pals and their supporters whining about them being prosecuted but happy for them to use their money lawyers to shut up honest people and tie up cases for years

Just like Johnson and their supporters ...

 

Theres a pattern here eh?

Their supporters also whine about elites - when trump, Farage, Johnson the Liar, crony Mone et al ARE the corrupt self serving elites

 

Edited by tobyjugg2
  • Like 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

More Fuel for Partygate cover up mentality - whats left of £3.2 million quids worth of taxpayer funded booze eh?

"Ministers have been asked to explain why a report on the UK government’s consumption of wine during the Covid pandemic has been delayed four times over the last year."

"The stock list was originally meant to be published in “early 2023”, was subsequently scheduled for July and then ministers later said it would appear in the autumn."

"The last update was from Andrew Mitchell, a Foreign Office minister, who answered a parliamentary question saying it would be published “before the Christmas recess” – but it never materialised by the end of the parliamentary term."

 

How long does it take to count all the missing bottles eh?

Perhaps counting whats left is a much smaller task?

 

"“One of the ways we know the government is gearing up for an election in May is that they have started running down the clock on all kinds of publications in the hope of delaying disclosure until the purdah period kicks in. We are seeing it in their repeated extension of freedom of information deadlines, we are seeing it in their delays of departmental transparency data, and now we are even seeing it in relation to this wine cellar report."

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Labour accuses government of holding back data on use of official alcohol stock between March 2020 and 2022

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...