Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Raaydaar vs HSBC


raaydaar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, well here we go down the road of getting back the charges.

I've got my statements from the internet banking and am in the process of collating all the charges from the last six years.

 

One question though before I send th einitial letter, and I apologise if it has been asked many times before but I can't seem to find it using the search function.

 

Do I need to write to them requesting details of all manual intervention on the account prior to submitting my claim? Or can I go ahead without requesting this information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I've been through the statements from 2001 to 2005 and the charges without interest come to just short of £4000, I know that to include the charges from 2006 will take me over the £5000 mark, so I will start off with the 5 years to 2005 and see what happens.

 

Letter will be going out to HSBC tomorrow along with the list of charges and request for the manual intervention details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if not too late, i think i'd hold off posting til someone advices you. and advise you they will. are you saying you haven't included any of the interest on the overdraft charges because at that level (meaning the total and the length of time passed) it is likely to be a significant amount.

Better to hold off and get it right than to plunge on and complicate matters.

so, it's probably going to go over 5K,

 

hopefully SOMEONE WILL JUMP IN HERE WITH THE ANSWERS, file for over 5K or break it into two claims - i don't think i've seen anyone talking about breaking into two claims datewise to avoid going over, i think it just means, were it to go to court it wouldn't be tracked into the small claim route.

 

i'm just saying hold on til you get an answer.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll hold off for now, as I understood it, the initial claim to the bank is for the charges but without the 8% interest which is claimed when legal action is taken. I'm only breaking it into 2 claims because my wife is concerned that should we do something wrong with the claim then we may be liable for the HSBC fees

Totals for 2001 - 2005 are:

 

Without Interest - £3620.63

 

With 8% Interest (as of 4th Dec) - £4483.39

Link to post
Share on other sites

raaydaar

 

Have you included a claim for any overdraft interest in your figures? Are you aware that you can claim that part of the overdraft interest which was caused by the penalty charges? I think that was what Lateralus was alluding to when asking if you had included interest in your calculations.

 

Be aware that HSBC are tending to close accounts when a second claim is made. Would this matter to you?

 

Have you considered claiming contractual interest? If you wanted to do this you would have to claim it now, unlike county court interest which only becomes claimable when you issue court proceedings.

 

 

There are advantages and disadvantages to going fast track. The main disadvantage would be an exposure to £750 costs if you lose. The advantage is that you can request disclosure which means getting the bank to reveal the true costs in relation to the account breaches. In my opinion they are even more likely to want to settle a claim that will go into fast track - to avoid disclosure. But none of us should be presuming that our cases will settle out of court, whether fast track or small claims.

 

My advice would be to take time to assess the implications of claiming contractual interest and to weigh up the pros and cons of small track v fast track. Reading threads of claims similar to your own should help you to decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I've goen through everything up to today and the total without any interest is £4238.50, so below the £5000 threshold, The contractual interest and overdraft interest scenario is all a bit complicated to work out so I've decided not to go down that route and will take the additional £845 in court interest when that happens.

 

One other question before I go ahead, the account is a joint account with Mrs Raaydaar, do we need to complete everything in joint names?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Superb, well that's the initial letter sent off to Customer Relations today, along with the schedule of charges.

I take it I shouldn't expect to hear anything now unless they wish to make some sort of "in good faith settlement."

When I send out the LBA, this will obviously coincide with xmas, should I give them an extra couple of dyas because of the bank holidays or stick to the 14 day timescales?

Strangely enough had a phone call from the bank this morning but was in bed after nights and couldn't be bothered answering - probably wanting to know when I'll be paying off the overdraft!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure - maybe give them 21 days in view of the bank holidays - you want to be seen to be acting reasonably in the eyes of the court I suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well surprise surprise, not a dicky bird from HSBC you would think they would at least have the decency to acknowledge my initial letter with a standard thank you our charges are reasonable etc.

Ah well, drafting out the LBA today to mail tomorrow was going to be nice and give them some extra time cos of xmas, but don't think I'll bother now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO No no no, sorry Bong I have to disagree..I bow to your superior knowledge usually but I'd just stick to the timetable...if they were that bothered about timings they wouldn't be sending letters out 2nd class or not relpying at all. Raaydaar - go with your original timetable and stick to it...most people don't have any form of communication from HSBC anyway!

babs x

Prelim sent to HSBC 10/10/2006 for £5035

no response :x

LBA sent 24/10/2006

no response :x

MCOL filed 10/11/2006 :eek:

MCOL issued 13/10/2006

HSBC acknowledged MCOL 17/11/2006

HSBC entered defence + case transferred 12/12/06 :mad:

FULL OFFER! Received today 14/12/06 :D

 

If I have been of assistance, please tip my scales but don't forget, this is only my personal opinion, I'm no legal eagle!

 

Please sign this petition:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers babs, Mrs Raaydaar is of the opinion we should give them a few extra days, but I've laid down the law, after all like you said if they had the decency to enter into some form of dialogue I might be inclined to be more tolerant, but a straigtforward refusal to even acknowledge the existence of my claim makes by blood boil!! So HSBC give me my money or pay me an extra grand in costs and interest!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good man, keep the wifey in her place - it worked with my boyf! LOL he was the one telling me by the way NOT the other way around!!

 

 

Good luck!

Prelim sent to HSBC 10/10/2006 for £5035

no response :x

LBA sent 24/10/2006

no response :x

MCOL filed 10/11/2006 :eek:

MCOL issued 13/10/2006

HSBC acknowledged MCOL 17/11/2006

HSBC entered defence + case transferred 12/12/06 :mad:

FULL OFFER! Received today 14/12/06 :D

 

If I have been of assistance, please tip my scales but don't forget, this is only my personal opinion, I'm no legal eagle!

 

Please sign this petition:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, amazingly, HSBC have acknowledged my existence, I received the standard thanks for your query we are looking into it and will get back to you in due course.

My guess is not before I do the mcol

 

Merry Xmas to one and all on here and hope that 2007 brings you all your HSBC monies

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another letter this morning, hoping that the gods were going to be nice to me before the new year, instead, Mr Colin Langdale wrote explaining that they were conducting an investigation into the charges and would get back to me as soon as possible, and advised me to read the eclosed leaflet detailing how the investigation would be carried out, but it would appear he or on of his minions neglected to enclose the leaflet.

Maybe they've run out of leaflets!!!

 

Well anyway, they received my LBA today according to Royal Mail, so I'll start getting the court bundle together (hopefully I won't need it though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wel the postman was nice to me this morning, received an offer from Mr Langdale, £120 short of my claim, so Mrs Raaydaar has decided that we should accept (provided that they waive the charges due to be applied in January), since she is desparate for some new furniture and a romantic weekend in Paris.

So thank you Mr Langdale and thanks to everyone on here for all your help couldn't have done it without you.

Donation will be on its way when I get the cash

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...