Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin, mystery extra line: 2 judgments for Data Protection breaches - so far!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the defendants solicitor if they are using one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

*does happy dance* Bundle all completed and sent off,with the help of the very useful webinar. Very glad to no longer have to deal with Adobe Acrobat-not easy to learn overnight. 

Have confined the documents I require to purely SAR requests and their replies(or lack thereof), their defence and the written offer from the executive team as everything else is irrelevant on this claim.

 

*after having gone to get mail, I have received a reply from Nicola Smith-apparently she wants the claim form, acknowledgment of service, allocation to small claims, DQ, transfer of proceedings and notice of hearing all to be included within my bundle too and resent out before the deadline...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as if she is deliberately trying to make life difficult for you.

 

Have you had their documents yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, lemon_martini2 said:

Nothing received so far.

 

Waiting for yours before they commit themselves...what date are you directed to file and exchange ?

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them till say Tues and then inform the court they have failed to comply with the courts directions dated xxxxxx...the court can strike out the defence and award you judgment for none compliance of its own volition.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do make this request from the court that then point out that in any event, their defence predates your claim and also doesn't refer to the claim at all and is as if they were dealing with a completely different claim.

You should also point out the court that their lack of cooperation has caused unnecessary inconvenience to you and that you are a litigant in person and that you respectfully ask the court to exercise its discretion towards you litigant in person costs.

It will be worth preparing a spreadsheet of the amount of time and trouble you have taken on this so far. Give it modest but when you consider the research, the learning, the provision of documents the preparation of documents and the filing and serving, I think it will be reasonable for you to say to the court that as a litigant in person you have expended a great deal of time dealing with unknown territory – and you should probably think about claiming for 20 hours.

Have it itemised in a spreadsheet which would company the request of the court. Keep it reasonable and well justified – don't make it look like a money grab but make sure that it looks organised and not greedy.

I think that it will be worth having this spreadsheet – time and costs – prepared anyway and kept up-to-date because it might be reasonable to ask for litigant in person costs anyway seeing as Nicola is making such a pigs ear of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have hit a little snag-the hearing is due to take place tomorrow virtually and the court have not given me any details of how it will take place-the Zoom code or room name or anything like that. I have tried ringing them today but the phone has just rung off the hook until 3pm when a message tells me they are only answering calls between 10am and 3pm due to Covid. I've sent the court an email as well to inform them, to make sure that Virgin can't win by default just by turning up online and then claiming I failed to attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you send an email to Virgin and tell them the problem and ask them if they will let you know so how they are proposing to attend the hearing.

 

Also telephone them repeatedly until you get the answer.

 

When you send emails to Virgin copy them to the court

Probably best to send repeated emails to Virgin and put them on notice that you simply don't have the details.

 

Send an email now and send one tomorrow morning early and then maybe 11 and then in the afternoon.

 

What time is the hearing scheduled for

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you completed your information, did you not put your mobile contact details and they will call you at the time to invite you into the meeting via the application they are using.  It will give you temporary access as a guest and you don't need to have the software app pre installed.

 

But do as Bankfodder advises and make sure you have mobile switched on and be available.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't have a good feeling about it.

 

I think you need to be making contact with them every half hour both by phone and by email so at the very least if you have to ask for a set aside you have got lots of evidence to show that you tried to reach out to them and the they declined to help you.

 

I think they have a responsibility to give you the information you need to take part in the hearing if you can only get in contact with the.

 

How long ago should you have received this information from the court?

It's certainly a a great shame that the court wasn't contacted at the beginning of the week or even last week to inform them that you didn't have the information you needed

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile will be on and I shall be emailing the court and Virgin tonight and tomorrow morning and as soon as court lines open at 10am I shall be calling them- I was calling constantly today but no-one was picking up. I was hoping that the court would have everything in order and have the details ready which is why I didn't panic at the beginning of the week when I hadn't heard anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK here's where we've reached so far-Virgin apparently have not received the link yet either-according to their chat, the adjudicator will send the link to me and then to Virgin. 

The court has not replied to the emails and neither has Nicola and her crew. Virgin apparently has no way of contacting their legal team(!) and the person on the Executive Team who is dealing with this case is on annual leave until the 4th September. If no-one receives the link and turns up, then what is the procedure? 

Once 10am hits, I will call the court and make sure I get someone there who can answer exactly what is going on.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the fun continues. I have managed to get in touch with the courts-apparently the case had been vacated because the court had noted that the fee had not been paid or the help with fees exemption codes sent to them.

 

When the girl looked back over the in-case management system, she could see that they had in fact acknowledged receipt of the fees code, and since they couldn't have acknowledged receipt of something that hadn't been sent, she has admitted it was the court's error and the case will now be placed on the calendar again. We await a new time and place.

 

Odd that I didn't receive any communication about this either from the court or from Virgin, who continued to submit defences and bundles after the date it was struck out-I'd have expected them to have been in touch immediately to inform me of the fact that my case was withdrawn and they had won...🤔

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you get all of this done in writing and send it it to Virgin and also to the courts so everybody is clear as to the understanding and how the understanding came about.

 

Always important to have a paper trail of everything.

 

it seems to me that either Virgin is run by the courts or else the courts are run by Virgin although which is which is not clear to me yet.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A new letter from Virgin Executive team regarding my complaint. 

They were unable to contact me about it on 20 August (the day of the postponed online hearing)

Their suggested resolution for the ongoing complaint that I have submitted is-...'to provide internal feedback' 🙄

'We hope this works for you-if we don't hear back after 28 days,we'll assume you're satisfied with everything and close your complaint'.

Another letter to tell them this does not work for me for certain will be winging its way to them. What else should I do as the next step-inform the courts that Virgin are continuing to work on this complaint even after defending it as without merit?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is all worth storing up as evidence of inaccurate data processing later on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any update on this? This has gone very quiet for a long time now.

Maybe it's worth phoning the court and to find out what's going on. It wouldn't at all surprised me that with the last mistake, the whole file now has been lost or mistakenly filed under "complete".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny you should mention it-I have today got a letter from the court telling me the judge's comments

'there is no record of an email of 23 July 2021 with the Help With Fees application'

'the Help With Fees code was not generated until either 21 April 2021 or 18 August 2021 and so cannot have been included in an email sent on 23 July 2021'. 

'If you want to set aside the order of 2 Aug 2021(I assume that's the one that no-one vhas received,vacating the case) you must make an N244 application  and pay the fee of £255 or submit a Help With Fees application'.

 

They don't even know when the code was generated and have no idea whether this was before or after the email was sent to them...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I don't understand this at all. I didn't realise that you made an application for assistance with fees. And I had no idea that this was ever raised as an issue before.
What on earth is going on?

Are you able to explain what this is all about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, might it be worth starting to phone the court regularly to see what on earth is happening. It certainly seems to me that if they have made an error then it should be pointed out to them in writing so that there is a paper trail.

I'm also wondering whether it's getting time may be to send virgin another SAR even though this present matter is not settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At last I'm back online-computer battery was screwed up and couldn't access any information  :(

 

Application for fees online was submitted and in post #316 the court confirmed they had received it and so it had to have been submitted.

 

Court will be contacted again tomorrow-they appear to be only answering phones between 10 and 3 and then it's a struggle to get anyone to actually pick up and emails just get autoresponses.

 

I could crack on with another SAR although they might argue it's repetitive as they've already replied to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it wouldn't really be repetitive because some considerable time has passed since the last one and apart from anything else there must be more data – but maybe it will be worth simply biding our time on that one.

Maybe it will be worth writing a real letter and sending it for the attention of the district judge in the style of a "polite complaint".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...