Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Your parking ticket may be unlawful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Ive just got a parking ticket for parking in a disabled bay without a badge clearly on display:o . On my original ticket it simply states date: 11/08/07,

it does not say "date of issue".

Now if my understanding is correct, does that mean my ticket is not unlawful? Any help gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 955
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

WEll in any case, Ive sent off a letter to my council this morning, stating that their ticket was unl;awful as it did not have date of issue and date of contravention on, so, on a technical note, their ticket was void, and so infact, it appears all Bradford Council tickets are. So indeed, onwards and upwards, will keep you al posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a pretty good [problem] presently being perpetrated by Brent Parking.

Recently, parts of Brent that don't fall under any CPZs or indeed, any parking restrictions but are close to Wembley Stadium, were designated "Event Day Parking Zones".

 

This means, they painted special bays for parking (on the footways), but they did stress - and I have the document printed by them proving this - that the existence of these bays is exclusively for Event Day use.

I must mention that parking on the footways IS allowed, the roads are very narrow here and we have been parking without hindrance in this manner for the past 9 years!!

 

This means we ALL need to have special parking permits for Event Days.

These have been issued to us. They are displayed.

There are signs up explaining what the bays are for - and their use.

Nothing says to park in them AT ALL TIMES or else.

Only on Event Days

 

So far, so good.

We have all the permits, and keep an eye out for these Event Days.

Remember, this is NOT a CPZ street.

However, the Brent Parking Wardens have now taken to sneaking into these UNRESTRICTED areas late at night on "Non Event Days" and sticking parking tickets on cars NOT parked in the Event Day parking bays.

 

The tickets claim a "Footway Parking Contravention".

 

The snag is - and you can check this now by googling "Brent Footway parking" - by Brent Parkings very own admission on their web site - the very areas being relentlessly harrassed by their overzealous Parking Wardens/ Attendants/ [problem] Artists - (delete as appropriate) in the middle of the night are Footway Parking Restrictions EXEMPT.

 

I live on Highmead Crescent. Wembley.

I got a parking ticket on 25/08/2007 at 10.36pm, parked on the same footway I have been parked on for the last 9 years.

 

Recap, that's a parking ticket for parking on the footway of a road which is exempt from footway parking restrictions / regulations - what have you.

 

This sordid insidious spectacle has been repeated up and down the street - usually on the more expensive cars - and is entirely at random.

It is ALWAYS done very late at night.

 

In my case, the ticket wasn't even fixed to the car, but thrown into the neighbours garden - just to maximise their profits.

 

Sadly, some uninformed residents of my street, scared by the wording of the NTO's they have received have meekly handed over their hard earned cash. £80 by the NTO stage. Nice little earner, and very illegal.

 

This is nothing more than legalised mugging.

 

I am of course contesting this ticket.

Does anyone have extra advice on what to do about naming and shaming Brent Parking?

 

Thunderstorm. :evil:

 

Have you actually written to the council and got a response? From your post it seems like you feel the Mayor himself directed the PAs to target you to. The 'Council' will be unaware the PCNs have even been issued they do not sit down and examine each PCN at the end of the day to see if they are correct. Even if they did it would be pointless as without being at the point of issue it would be impossible to determine if the PCN was valid. It seems from your post that PAs have missunderstood the markings and issued incorrectly which is annoying but the reason the appeals system exists. Try ringing the Parking dept and asking for clarification of the parking restrictions in the first instance then if you get no joy take it to appeal as without the footway parking signs the PCN is invalid as the street is exempt as you stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, had parking ticket for not displaying permit,with day and date scratched off, its a scratch card,where you scratch day and date off.i contested it and received photos,sure enough my van on double yellow with very cluttered dash board,photo taken from5 yards.next photo,close up of dash board with scratch card in with no day or date scratched off.trouble is it was a perfectly clear dash and not even my steering column.any thoughts please.tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, had parking ticket for not displaying permit,with day and date scratched off, its a scratch card,where you scratch day and date off.i contested it and received photos,sure enough my van on double yellow with very cluttered dash board,photo taken from5 yards.next photo,close up of dash board with scratch card in with no day or date scratched off.trouble is it was a perfectly clear dash and not even my steering column.any thoughts please.tez

 

Take it to appeal.

 

Tell the council that the contravention did not occur because you had a valid permit.

 

When it gets to PATAS, produce your own pictures of your car against the evidence of the Council's photographs. It won't be the first time that PA/Council have falsified photographs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, had parking ticket for not displaying permit,with day and date scratched off, its a scratch card,where you scratch day and date off.i contested it and received photos,sure enough my van on double yellow with very cluttered dash board,photo taken from5 yards.next photo,close up of dash board with scratch card in with no day or date scratched off.trouble is it was a perfectly clear dash and not even my steering column.any thoughts please.tez

 

If your van was photographed on a DYL you would have been unable to use a permit valid or not? If the van was not in a bay I'd argue this point as its easier to prove using their photos than bother about scratchcards, even if it was in contravention for the DYL offence its too late for them to change the contravention now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your van was photographed on a DYL you would have been unable to use a permit valid or not? If the van was not in a bay I'd argue this point as its easier to prove using their photos than bother about scratchcards, even if it was in contravention for the DYL offence its too late for them to change the contravention now.

hi,you can park on these dyl,if you have valid scratch card,doing work in residents houses.the residents issue them to trades people or visitors.tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,you can park on these dyl,if you have valid scratch card,doing work in residents houses.the residents issue them to trades people or visitors.tez

 

Are you sure? Parking on DYL is not allowed at ANY time except for loading even with a permit? I would double check the markings in the street if there are DYL you are allowed by law to load and unload WITHOUT any kind of permit. If there are bays with DYL between that is a different matter but you should have got done for a parking contravention not a permit one if on them. Yellow lines are governed by national statutes and the Highway code local councils cannot change the meaning of them and isue permits to park on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure? Parking on DYL is not allowed at ANY time except for loading even with a permit? I would double check the markings in the street if there are DYL you are allowed by law to load and unload WITHOUT any kind of permit. If there are bays with DYL between that is a different matter but you should have got done for a parking contravention not a permit one if on them. Yellow lines are governed by national statutes and the Highway code local councils cannot change the meaning of them and isue permits to park on them.

hi, i will nip back and read the parking sign.the lines were done by request of residents.new hospital being built,lack of parking at hospital meant workers at hospital and visitors were parking in nearby streets.tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i will nip back and read the parking sign.the lines were done by request of residents.new hospital being built,lack of parking at hospital meant workers at hospital and visitors were parking in nearby streets.tez

its called a controlled zone.tez.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Councils are allowed to give permission to park on DYL where it is for private or public works.

 

Disabled drivers can park on DYL for up to 3 hours provided there are no kerb markings

 

I realise that exemptions can be given out and bb can park on yellow lines but can't see how they can sell permits to park somewhere forbidden in the highway code? Loading is also permitted by law they cannot charge for that either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure? Parking on DYL is not allowed at ANY time except for loading even with a permit? I would double check the markings in the street if there are DYL you are allowed by law to load and unload WITHOUT any kind of permit. If there are bays with DYL between that is a different matter but you should have got done for a parking contravention not a permit one if on them. Yellow lines are governed by national statutes and the Highway code local councils cannot change the meaning of them and isue permits to park on them.

 

 

It's because the lines exist by virtue of a TRO which is raised (and written) by the Council (as highway authority) - they can put such provisions in as they like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir /Madam

 

I was parked for 5 mins in a private parking bay, inside all the lines, and returned to discover a ticket on my car by a private company which stated 'obstructed parking', There were no other vehicles around and I was parked legally. I have written to the organisation concerned and they have asked for a payment of £85 or court action will be initiated in 28 days. Without photographic evidence how do I appeal this ticket? Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because the lines exist by virtue of a TRO which is raised (and written) by the Council (as highway authority) - they can put such provisions in as they like.

 

They cannot change the meanings of signs and lines regardless of any TRO if they could it would make the highway code a nonsense. They can chose where to place restrictions but cannot vary the meaning of the signs. A motorist should be able to park without stopping off at the Town Hall to check on the meaning of the local signage. A DYL is the same in Aberdeen or Bognor the council cannot decide the change the Highway code. They can issue waivers to park on a DYL for workmen, removers etc but that is not the issue here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi Neil,

great work!

I have been issued with a police fixed penalty notice for parking on double yellow lines. However the reason I parked there is because the yellow lines are not joined at the end and therefore as I understand it they are not valid. Do you know if this is still correct?

Thanks for any advise you can give me.

Cheers,

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Don't know if this has come up

 

 

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:38 2006 This case (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 1 All ER 686) demonstrates that for an ExclusionClause to be incorporated into a contract, other than by explicit agreement, the affected party must be given adequate warning. Mr Thornton parked his car in a commercial car park. The car park did display a sign to the effect that cars were parked at the owner's risk. As it happens it was Mr Thornton that was injured, not the car. The car park's terms of business were printed on the back of the ticket issued from the ticket dispenser but, it was ruled, this did not form part of the contract as the contract was concluded before the ticket was issued. The notice on the building was deemed insufficiently precise to allow a disclaimer of liability for injury. This case was one of many in which Lord Justice ` I-hate-exclusion-clauses' Denning used the rules of incorporation to defeat exclusion clauses that mitigated against consumers. These days such technical manoeuvres would be unncessary, as a contract term disclaiming liability for personal injury would be deemed void under the UnfairContractTermsAct1977.

 

'In order to give sufficient notice, it would need to be printed in red ink with a red hand pointing to it - or something equally startling' (Lord Denning).

 

Could this not be applied to any notice?

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry everyone, but could you have a look at my ticket? It's different from the other tickets described here. First off, it was issued by the Police, not a local council which is worrying.

 

Also, they got the car colour wrong (The car is quite obviously green, not blue). I received this ticket parked on double yellow lines in a small market town centre. People always park in this spot and have done for years, and no-one has to my knowledge been penalised in this way.

 

Any comments would be much appreciated

 

ticket.jpg[Worth telling his boss to check his colour vision. Red/Green trouble common in Men, ask 'Should he be allowed to be a police officer?]

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry everyone, but could you have a look at my ticket? It's different from the other tickets described here. First off, it was issued by the Police, not a local council which is worrying.

 

Also, they got the car colour wrong (The car is quite obviously green, not blue). I received this ticket parked on double yellow lines in a small market town centre. People always park in this spot and have done for years, and no-one has to my knowledge been penalised in this way.

 

Any comments would be much appreciated

 

ticket.jpg[Worth telling his boss to check his colour vision. Red/Green trouble common in Men, ask 'Should he be allowed to be a police officer?]

 

Firstly, this is an FPN issued by the Police; so it does deal with a criminal offence rather than a decriminalised contravention.

 

Secondly, an FPN is an offer to deal with the matter rather than going to court - as such, the detail regarding colour etc is not relevant.

 

The only appeal to an FPN is as it states on the ticket - make a request to have the matter dealt with by a Magistrates' Court. In which case, the FPN is voided and a summons issued instead. The closeness of blue and green is such that the Bench will allow correction under the slip rule if the green is continued onto the summons.

 

If you lose in Court, you will be fined at least the £30 of the FPN offer; £25 - £35 costs and £15 victim surcharge.

 

Pragmatically, I would just pay the £30 and have done with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

just a quick question , i got a ticket and was towed away by westminister council last night had to pay £260 to get the car back!

 

i had no ticket until i left! just read it thouroughly now, no date of issue just date of notice and the top of the ticket says penalty charge notice and only seen at 21:40 no in between time.

 

Now everyone is appealing aginst paying the fine within 14days etc but i had to pay immediately otherwise i had no car is this admission of guilt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...