Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received an email in the last 10 minutes 4) The Claimant's witness is currently out of the office on annual leave and this was not relayed to DWF Law until after the event which has caused a further unfortunate delay. 5) The Court has directed parties to file and serve any evidence upon which they intend to rely not later than 14- days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 6 June 2024. Regrettably, the Claimant will have insufficient time to finalise their witness evidence and supporting exhibits as directed. We therefore respectfully apply to extend the time for filing/serving evidence so that the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely by filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 13 June 2024  It also includes a "Notice of Hearing" stating that the application hearing will take place on 13th June at 10.00am.  Confused as to whether I need to attend this ?
    • I've received this notice to keeper. I work for the NHS and was delayed due to patient care. I park here regular and and have never had any issues. I've looked at the evidence on the portal and other than showing that i entered at 12.59.33 and departed at 17:14:14 it doesn't state how long i overstayed for. I paid for 4 hours parking over the phone which i wont have done till i got parked but as its over the phone i have no receipt or record but it is not possible for me to have been in excess of 15mins from the photos alone but I'm unsure having read other threads whether grace periods are 10 or 15 minutes. I havent appealed yet but and was about to but in appealing i'm showing i'm the driver which i gather is something you state we must never do. I don't like confrontation but £60 seems extortionate. Hope you can help. 🤞 1 Date of the infringement 30th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30th May 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 5th June 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No reference to schedule 4 just says"...we the creditor reserve the right to recover unpaid parking charges from the registered keeper in accordance with POFA 2012." 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NA 7 Who is the parking company? Carpark securities 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Northgate, Halifax Former Dews Car Park HX1 1XJ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   Notice to Keeper.pdf
    • It never seems to amaze me how the chuckleheads think that No Stopping can ever offer a contract when it is prohibitory. In any case you did not accept the contract by entering the land, you entered the land to get to the airport for goodness sake. In most car parks there is a Consideration period that allows motorists to decide whether they want to stay in the car park . Here on a road, there is no consideration period and whether the motorist finds the terms agreeable or not even assuming that they are able to understand that they are being hoodwinked into believing they are being offered a  contract they cannot turn back. They have a plane to catch and even if they did turn back because they didn't accept the  No Stopping term of   the so called contract they would still have had to stop to turn around. Plus there is a question of Frustration of Contract. You had to stop at a pedestrian crossing .    
    • Just a couple paragraphs their WS that it might be useful to refer to specifically in the OP's WS... Para 6 A contract was formed with "the driver" of the vehicle. Para 8 "The driver" accepted the contract. (The "driver" is not named, or identified anywhere in the WS). Para 7 WHY would there ever be a "no stopping" restriction in a car park? (In Para 10, they specify that it is a "car park"). Para 11 "The Defendant" became liable." Again, they have not shown that the Defendant was "the driver", simply the keeper. Para 20 "It is a matter of agreement"? Not really sure what they're trying to say here...
    • Thank you for relying so quickly! That is what I had concluded was the reality of the situation.. I'm still waiting for the call within my time slot.. I will try to fill this thread with more info, find original letters and show the docs of the pack I was sent, a pack with no real covering letter to show what it was in response to or from whom..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid £28k next steps


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Pers i wouldn't pay too much attention to mse posts..

they are always posted with dark meanings mostly by so called industry knowalls

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems most people are fighting for them to be removed and defaulted, I have tried that with virgin Sainsbury’s and MBNA but none budging. Just hope there is a way I can get a mortgage in a sooner than there but we’ll see, I’ll put in all my effort.

 

picking your brains as is a daily occurrence this week (appreciated), what’s should I be looking for when I get my SARS returned and how can they help me ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First response to CCAs Pra group sent a standard letter back with postal orders saying they will look into in. Also been reading about online agreements (which I am sure mine are) did not need a signature, you ticked a box and that’s how you were accepted. 
 

Does this mean as my contracts were all online tick box ones they will all be enforceable ? Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

god no far from it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would be able to get a mortgage , probably now even, going sub prime. Also if you have a 25% deposit the world would be your oyster. Although you might need to wait a couple of years to get down to the realms of a 15% deposit.

 

Or maybe not, go find a good mortgage  broker, that’s the best advice.

 

Do not discount sub prime mortgages, you might end up paying an extra £150 per month but at least that’s better than flushing your

money down the bog by paying rent.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type ..no need to hit quote...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can be theoretically, but often DX or Andyorch can see whether they are cobbled together BS from the copy &’paste department, and it seems that’s usually the case.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhhhhhh, I await their responses then and will pick the learned brains on here, love this forum. Feel like you are in the wrong all the time and the collectors are the ones in charge, now I know that’s not the case 

Edited by Halfwaythere
Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel my only option with the AP markers is to pay them off,

 

I have tried numerous appeals and complaints to get them defaulted and all 4 have rejected as I have continued to pay 🙄.

I will have them all paid off by the end of this year but means until 2027 they will sit there rearing their ugly head at every lender.

 

I’ve read up and can’t see any way of changing this.

I think I will have go the way of a heftier deposit and adverse credit mortgage and remortgaging.

Time isn’t on my side as I am 36, I would like to be on the property ladder by 40. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who have you complained to about the AP markers

and how many of your accounts have them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

virgin are MBNA, so 3 MBNA cards then..

 

and it's quite usual for them to object to the AP marker removal or to register a default esp under the recent ICO rule change.

 

worth a read..

 

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=MBNA AP markers&oq=MBNA AP markers&gs_l=partner-generic.3...197810.201705.0.201881.15.15.0.0.0.0.184.1110.13j2.15.0.csems%2Cnrl%3D13...0.3920j1206742j16...1.34.partner-generic..14.1.110.uMpES7e82cA

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a new ICO rule change ?

 

i think I’ll try again, why not, I have the summer off so I’ll give it another go.

I have an advantage with Sainsbury’s I think, they insist on doing everything on the phone even when you ask in writing (they send you a letter saying to ring 🙄)

 

the lady on the phone convinced me I didn’t need a default as argued against what I was saying about AP markers saying it was not true.

 

I am going for them and insisting all done by letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

and you expected any different??

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes because from true SARS info I got from Halifax (where my Link loan debt come from) I’m pretty sure Halifax have the CCA so don’t understand why Link haven’t sent it me, maybe it will come.

 

Im in a quandary with my two PRA group ones as these aren’t defaulted and putting AP markers on my account so wrecking my credit file if I don’t pay off, I wonder if they have become wise not to default now that’s why some companies aren’t 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Halfwaythere said:

so wrecking my credit file if I don’t pay off,

 

paying anything off does not remove markers or defaults. nor improve your score.

as said numerous times before

 

poss your best idea might be to totally stop paying all debts with AP markers being registered

then when it is defaulted resume if they've complied to a cca request and we've checked it.

 

that way atleast you're are guaranteed in 6yrs the debt will vanish from your file

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know but I could pay all my debts that are AP markers in the next 2 months then they are defiantly gone 6 years from then instead of fighting to default

-and can PRA default me as a DCA?

 

Hmm in a quandary.

I am not going to pay them This month and instead wipe my virgin card

I am then only left with the 2xPRA group debts at £1300 each with AP markers and the rest AP marked are gone. 

 

I’ve just reopened my complaints to MBNA, Virgin and Sainsbury’s for not defaulting my accounts.

If I don’t get the correct decision this time I am complaining to the ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Halfwaythere said:

I could pay all my debts that are AP markers in the next 2 months then they are defiantly gone 6 years from then

 

you hope sb date = it must be removed....

holding off for a few weeks to see if they have compliant CCA's could save you £1000's.

if they haven't - then that will be the same very much cheaper hoped for result.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you related to A/C falling off the credit file after 6yrs after last payment or settlement.

its never guaranteed that a debt being SB makes that actually happen.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...