Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cancelled BT within 14 days but they wont leave me alone.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I set up an account for BT broadband when I bought my new house,

they messed me about so much within the 14 days cancellation that I actioned it and cancelled.

The order was made 26-09-19 cancelled and confirmed back to me by email 02-10-20 equipment returned.

 

BT has pursued me for money ever since,

I have had lengthy phone calls confirming it was cancelled and no money is due which they agree and apologise and say they will rectify yet still the bills come. 

Despite talking to many people and having screen grabs of live chats confirming there should be no charge and confirmation emails in reality nothing changes.

 

I now have letter of referral to debt collectors.

Can I get bad credit over this?....

what shall I do,

contacting BT makes no difference.

 

Thanks in advance.

Sam   

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you in the mood to make trouble?

 

Please monitor this thread for a fuller reply tomorrow

 

In the meantime send them an sar immediately and also start preparing a letter of claim. No point in mucking around. You might as well assert yourself and go in for a bit of compensation and a bit of grudge

 

in the sar, demand to know who they have shared your data with - as well as asking for the disclosure. You are entitled to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect you already have a default if they've sold it to the likes of Lowell

who is now chasing you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you confirm it is still with BT, as in which debt collector is it, and post up the letter as a pdf here.  Also check your credit files to see if any derfault there. do as Bankfodder suggests with the SAR.  Do you have copies of any correspondence from BT saying all cancelled and nothing owing, also did you record any of the phone calls,.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

I would suspect you already have a default if they've sold it to the likes of Lowell

who is now chasing you?

 

dx

 

 

I hope so. All the more grist to the mill!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are several heads to attack BT with if that is the case DX and BF, GDPR and unlawful processing of data being but  one ,could get BT and the DCA under that probably. especially if BT have done their (and Vodafone's) usual trick of selling a non existent debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis of what you say here – the facts of the story as you tell them and also the evidence which you say you have, I think you will have no difficulty on taking on BT and winning and also getting a sum in compensation if you are prepared to assert yourself.

Frankly I don't think there's any point in wasting time trying to get into dialogue with these people. They are dinosaurs and like many companies they are now using the virus crisis as an opportunity to be even more difficult and inaccessible and frustrating.

The only way to deal with this thing is to move directly to a letter of claim and then begin an action in the small claims court. It's really up to you.

Bring a small claim in the County Court is very easy. You can started online using the court service Moneyclaim system and course we will help you all the way. The chances of you losing are negligible but even if you did, you would simply lose your claim fee and possibly the hearing fee.
BT won't listen to you. You can see that the only thing they're really good at is moving into debt collection mode and they've already started. If they have instructed debt collectors then the chances are that they have already blighted your credit file which means that you will have to live for six years in the financial wilderness and meanwhile suffer the harassment of debt collectors both by letter and possibly on the telephone.

Presumably you now have a broadband service elsewhere – who with?

 

Incidentally, I am assuming that you do have evidence. You've been on the telephone – but have you recorded the calls? You involved in online chats – but did you get email transcripts of your chats?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the non debt has been sold rather than just passed to a DCA for Collection, to as DX say one like Lowell or Cabot (Crabpots) they also might be worthy of a GDPR letter and demand for £250- £500  plus the  matter of your referral to the Information Commissioner their breach by processing your data doesn't fall within any reasonable excuse as there was no debt to begin with.   That would be for later if the DCA has also trampled over your credit files and carry on after BT are sorted, a back burner one that BT is target for now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that it is far more likely that BT would be responsible for any data intrusion by DCA's which it had instructed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed BF, but IF BT have sold it on rather than passed for collection, it might be different as the DCA is wrongly processing of itself, but that is a long way away if at all.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I hadn't appreciated that the debt had been sold. However, although you can sell the rights – you can't sell the duties. The duties and liabilities remain with the original creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many Thanks all, this is a lovely breeze of support really appreciate this.

So proof of cancelation I have.....

 

- Response to my email (via their return email) 02-10-20 confirming phone line and broadband were cancelled (order was put in 26-09-19)

- Screen grab of online chat with operative also confirming order is cancelled on their system

---------------

The letter they sent just says its being referred to DCA no info on who they are.

Yes I can send a SAR and will do so

What amount should I suggest of compensation?

---------------

I have made several phone calls to BT some lasting up to 40minutes these should be on my phone bill I guess.

---------------

Here is the time I have had wasted with BT for an order that should never have become valid......

 

received 41 emails

6 phone calls lasting 20-40 minutes

online chats x 2 lasting about 20minutes each

about 20 letters

 

Thanks again any more info needed let me know ! 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been having phone calls. Have you recorded the calls?

 

If you want help with this and if you want to move it forward – then you will have to engage with this thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder, so the calls may show up on my phone bills as I rang them....... is that what you mean by recorded?

I have email proof that the order was cancelled.

 

 

15 hours ago, BankFodder said:

If you want help with this and if you want to move it forward – then you will have to engage with this thread

Sorry Bankfodder not easy to respond quickly sometimes, have young children here in lockdown that need looking after ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no speech...you cant prove what they said

 

so you have written proof rom them the everything WAS cancelled??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no. I mean recording the calls so that you have an audio recording. As you had been here since 2014 I had imagined that you would be aware of our standard advice to read our customer services guide and implement the advice there before making any telephone calls to any company. This is essential survival.

I suggest that you now install a call recorder. Reader customer services guide and have further telephone calls with them and this time see if you can get them to commit themselves in an incriminating way. Of course you don't give them warnings

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have saved those emails I hope don't delete them print them or forward them to another email address or copy and paste them into a Word Processor and save as a doc.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dx100uk said:

no speech...you cant prove what they said

 

so you have written proof rom them the everything WAS cancelled??

Yes email from BT confirming broadband and phone line were cancelled

 

8 hours ago, brassnecked said:

You have saved those emails I hope don't delete them print them or forward them to another email address or copy and paste them into a Word Processor and save as a doc.

Yes I made sure I kept the mails and took screen grabs of the online chat showing the person who I was talking to. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, samj8042 said:

So Bankfodder continue with SAR etc as you outlined and other actions regardless calls were not recorded but I have email confirming all was cancelled?..... Thanks again

 

You are asking if you should continue with the SAR. This was suggested to you on Tuesday within half an hour or so of you beginning this thread and confirmed by another member of the site team a short time after that and I would have expected that you had sent this off by now.  It takes up to 30 days for them to respond and every day you delay is a day longer at the other end and an extra day which plays into their hands.

I understand that you have commitments that are particularly acute during this virus crisis – but you should understand that this is a crisis which affects all of us – including the site team and we have commitments as well.

I know this is going to sound harsh, but the people that you need to be explaining your family commitments to are BT and the debt collectors, if you think they'll listen to you. Of course they won't care. In fact they will probably move forward and capitalise on the fact that you are unable to allocate your time properly to this matter – and eventually that will cause you damage which will last for years and hurt you and your family.
The debt collection industry is one of the few industries that is striving on the current crisis because people don't have the money or they don't have the time to deal with the errors which are being caused by the companies that they are dealing with. This is what is happening to you.

Well done on the email evidence you have collected and the screenshots. This seems to be very well controlled but you should still be recording your calls. There is often very important information that is lost because people don't record the course despite the fact that this is the advice we have been giving on this forum for well over 10 years. It's not a game.

Also, you speak about your time commitments. I'm afraid that you're going to have to deal with this very aggressively. The debt collection agencies will move forward very quickly and if they haven't damaged your credit file then they will do very soon. You should check your credit file immediately.

If you haven't set off the SAR already then I think you need to ask yourself why not. If you are not recording your calls think you need to ask yourself the same question.

Fortunately you haven't lost any money to BT so far. I think I asked you earlier on have you now got an alternative service but I don't think you addressed this point. Please will you let us know what you are doing for Internet access. Have you suffered any financial loss as a result of BT's error?

If you have all the information that you say you have then I think you have the basis for suing BT for breach of data protection rules. They have a statutory duty to process your data accurately and anything else is unlawful.
However, to bring a legal action on this will take a time commitment from you. It won't take very much and I can imagine that once they receive the papers they will sit down and start to look at the far more carefully and start to treat you as a human being instead of simply another pressed individual that has fallen through the gaps in their system.

I asked you early on whether you are prepared to make trouble about this and you have an address that either. Once again, I know that I'm being a bit harsh and my approach to this – but I'm afraid that you will need to be assertive in the way you deal with this if you want to deal with it quickly and to minimise damage or to repair any damage – and hopefully come away with a bit of compensation.

 

The alternative to my approach is to try and engage them in dialogue and get them to understand that they have made errors and to count on them being reasonable and to treat you as an individual.
Good luck with that!
You really will find that there is a drain on your scarce time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There really is no other option with BT than to go for the jugular, as BF states they will just go on fobbing you off.  Call recording is most important as their customer services might well just tell you to contact XXX DCA as it's with them now.  that would be the nail in their coffin also.  What's the name of the DCA  they  have involved/possibly sold the non debt to  it would likely be just a spreadsheet entry with an account number and alleged amount along with other real debts they are passing or selling on?  Check those credit files,ASAP, and do that SAR now, not tomorrow not next week, but Right Now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR is being sent off in the morning.... it will take too long to describe my commitments and days at the moment but will move as soon as I possibly can.

I am going to start my letter of claim, any idea of amount I should be looking for? 

 

I made the order with BT Business ( I work from home for myself )  to be in place when I moved to my new address, they made so may errors sending equipment there before I got there ( other people were in the house not known to me ) and changing the engineer appointment 4 times I lost confidence I would have service when I landed at the new address which is why I cancelled. I went with Virgin instead and by coincidence their hardware was already in the house due to previous tenant signing up so had a speedy set up which didn't loose me time but was quite stressful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well we need to calculate your actual losses – in other words ascertainable financial loss that you suffered and then also we will decide upon a figure for distress caused by their mishandling of your personal data.

So please can you detail in a bullet pointed order, the problems which occurred. Did you lose earnings? How you inconvenience? Actual losses are much easier than simply claiming for inconvenience.

On the basis of what you have told us so far, I think that the amount you can claim will be pretty modest – as will the figure for distress although because we can say that your stress levels have been exacerbated by the fact that you are dealing with two children and in confinement et cetera, we can jack up the compensation level a little.

Have you been without an Internet service for any particular length of time – and if so how has this impacted you or your children? For instance, have your children needed to do online schooling while they have been in confinement?
Let's not forget that the main objective of this is to get BT off your back and to clear your credit file.
After that, if we can get you the compensation then that is cream on the cake. I expect that we can. In fact I can't imagine that it will go to a hearing – but you should be prepared for it to do so.

Let's start with your actual inconvenience and actual losses if any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again BankFodder will get the SAR off in the morning then come back to you listing the incidents. There was no loss in connection as Virgin set up at the new address in time for me to land there and start business and this order was made end of November and cancelled 2nd October so these was no loss of connection in any way and didn't clash with the corona outbreak.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I understand that you are contracting with them as a business?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...