Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Am I entitled to a refund if my ski holiday trip is cancelled by the company?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1520 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

I have recently booked a ski trip with a company called NUCO. They have announced that if the FCO changes the travel to Tignes destination to "Nothing but urgent" then NUCO will cancel the trip and none of us will be entitled to a refund. It is a university trip of 1500 people. 

 

Please help! I am looking to 'hopefully' find out if there are laws that will guarantee us a refund on this! 

 

Cheers,

Ryan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that without a doubt you would be entitled to a refund.

Are you really saying that 1500 people are being threatened with the cancellation of the trip and no refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the Ts and Cs.

 

https://nucotravel.com/booking-conditions-2019-20/

 

ETA: I wonder if this is what they're quoting although it doesn't sound very fair.

 

20. FORCE MAJEURE – Except where otherwise expressly stated in these Booking Conditions we will not be liable or pay you compensation if our contractual obligations to you are affected by any event which we or the supplier(s) of the service(s) in question could not, even with all due care, foresee or avoid. These events can include, but are not limited to war, threat of war, civil strife terrorist activity and its consequences or the threat of such activity, riot, the act of any government or other national or local authority including port or river authorities, industrial dispute, lock closure, natural or nuclear disaster, fire, chemical or biological disaster and adverse weather conditions, epidemics and pandemics, unavoidable technical problems with transport and all similar events outside our or the supplier(s) concerned’s control. Advice from the Foreign Office to avoid or leave a particular country may constitute Force Majeure.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds extremely unfair. At the very least they should be required to divest themselves of their profits so that customers might get a certain percentage back – but I wonder how enforceable the whole thing really is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

 

Thanks honeybee - yes that is the correct company. 

Here is the insurance I took out as part of booking the package: 

https://nucotravel.com/app/uploads/2019/07/IPID_2019_NUCO_NS9-0046052-Standard-A.pdf

Which clearly states if FCO change the guidelines advice, then it is NOT covered. 

 

So, I was wondering if we had any law/legal experts that knew of any laws that might protect us, or if its dumb luck and I should take out another insurance to cover it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but that is the insurance. The insurers are protecting themselves against having to reimburse you. If you have any rights to reimbursement then it is the holiday company who would have to reimburse you and frankly it really should be down to the holiday company to insure themselves against this kind of thing – not you.

This is exactly the kind of thing that we have with delivery companies such as Hermes where they refuse to reimburse you in respect of their own breaches of contract or their own negligence if you don't insure against it. It's also a type of extended warranty where companies want you to insure against the failure of the products which they sell you in case they are substandard or defective in some way.

If you could bring some of your friends who are also going on this holiday along here to post their own threads and to express their concerns then I might be able to get some press attention to focus on this. It sounds like a good story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, some further information. 

 

A friend called Endsleigh - the insurance company - who apparently told him that if the FCO change the guidelines, and the trip gets cancelled, then if we give endsleigh written confirmation of the trip cancellation, then endsleigh can get the money to refund us from the government. 

 

Given that their policy specifically states that FCO guideline changes against travel are specifically not covered, this sounds like a load of BS - but could their be truth in it? Will the govt reimburse endsleigh to reimburse us? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legislation that may help.   Particularly 12 (7), if the traveller was to cancel.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/634/contents/made

 

Termination of the package travel contract by the traveller

12.—(1) The provisions of this regulation are implied as a term in every package travel contract.

(2) A traveller may terminate the package travel contract at any time before the start of the package.

(3) Where the traveller terminates the package travel contract under paragraph (2), the traveller may be required to pay an appropriate and justifiable termination fee to the organiser.

(4) The package travel contract may specify reasonable standard termination fees based on—

(a)the time of the termination of the contract before the start of the package; and

(b)the expected cost savings and income from alternative deployment of the travel services.

(5) In the absence of standardised termination fees, the amount of the termination fee must correspond to the price of the package minus the cost savings and income from alternative deployment of the travel services.

(6) The organiser must provide a justification for the amount of the termination fee if the traveller so requests.

(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) to (6), in the event of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and which significantly affect—

(a)the performance of the package, or

(b)the carriage of passengers to the destination,

the traveller may terminate the package travel contract before the start of the package without paying any termination fee.

(8) Where the package travel contract is terminated under paragraph (7), the traveller is entitled to a full refund of any payments made for the package but is not entitled to additional compensation.

 

The will argue that Force Majeure  clause overrides any rights for you to cancel the trip in the circumstances and to request a full refund.

 

Travel weekly article

 

http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articles/359686/coronavirus-what-are-the-legal-implications-for-package-tour-organisers

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RyanB96 said:

So, some further information. 

 

A friend called Endsleigh - the insurance company - who apparently told him that if the FCO change the guidelines, and the trip gets cancelled, then if we give endsleigh written confirmation of the trip cancellation, then endsleigh can get the money to refund us from the government. 

 

Given that their policy specifically states that FCO guideline changes against travel are specifically not covered, this sounds like a load of BS - but could their be truth in it? Will the govt reimburse endsleigh to reimburse us? 

 

 

I haven't read that in the press. I'd be asking Endsleigh to confirm it in writing but wouldn't hold out much hope.

 

Do you have the Ts and Cs for Endsleigh's travel policy?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this so sounds like a uni project question it's unreal...

 

I would gather this is with the full support and on behalf of the uni itself.

therefore their existing insurance should cover any reinburse every one of the 1500 students fron their uni going abroad.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where it gets tricky is that half our group is no longer at uni, but have friends at uni still hence going on the uni trip as 'alumni'. Not sure if that complicates stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

who have all the people going paid their money too?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Other booking terms from NUCO are below.  FCO guidance about travel is just that 'guidance'. Very rarely would Government actually ban travel to an area.

 

""if your holiday is terminated as a result of your breach of the rules of personal conduct in section 14 below, or in the event of “force majeure”. Force majeure means circumstances such as war or threat of war, riot, civil strife, industrial dispute, terrorist activity, natural or nuclear disaster, fire, technical problems, adverse weather, accidents with transport, government action and any other similar events beyond our control. In these circumstances, we cannot accept liability or offer compensation or refunds if we are forced to cancel, curtail or change, in any way, your holiday or where the performance or prompt performance of our contractual obligations is prevented or effected.

We will not, where possible, cancel your travel arrangements less than 35 days before your departure date, except for reasons of force majeure or failure by you to pay the final balance. We may cancel your holiday before this date if, e.g., the minimum number of clients required for a particular travel arrangement is not reached.""

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-the-foreign-commonwealth-office-puts-together-travel-advice

 

From the Gov.uk site on the FCO advice

"How travel companies and airlines use our travel advice

Travel companies and airlines often take our advice into account but the decision to cancel or reschedule a flight, holiday, tour or excursion is a decision that can only be taken by the travel company and the customer. The question of refunds is a matter that must be resolved between the customer and the relevant airline, tour operator or travel agent. We don’t dictate when travel can or can’t take place.

If you have booked a package holiday, your travel company must comply with the Package Travel Regulations. Part of this law says that customers are entitled to a refund or an alternative holiday if there has been a significant change since the time of booking.

Travel insurance companies sometimes refer to our travel advice in their policies. For example, your policy may not provide cover if you travel to a country where the FCO advise against all, or all but essential travel. Some travel insurance policies may allow you to claim if you cancel a journey because of a change in our travel advice.

Make sure your travel insurance policy includes the cover you want. See our Travel Insurance page.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appears to me that the advice must be to buy a Travel Insurance now that would cover the risk.  The FCO have not published any advice yet on travel.  No issue has yet arisen, which would cause the holiday to be cancelled  Nuco have simply told you that they would argue 'force majeure'.

 

So the answer to the people who have booked this holiday is to check that their Travel Insurance covers them and if not to cancel and take out alternative Insurance that does provide the cover.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the University if they would publish some form of notice to those who have booked any holidays. General information.

 

Provide them with a copy of the Nuco letter and explain that it may be advisable for anyone who has booked any form of holiday to make sure that they have Travel insurances which provides adequate cover.  The University may not wish to offer advice as such, but if you explain that 1500 current and former students have booked this trip through Nuco, a lot of people are affected.  Plus it will not just be Nuco, but other travel companies, so other students could be affected. 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...