Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1521 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today, we have had a letter from the court ( Claim form Northampton County Court

Particulars of Claim 

 

The claimants claim is for the sum of £349.77 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a loan agreement regulated by the consumer  credit act 1974 between the defendant and Instant Cash Loans Ltd T/A Payday UK under account reference xxxxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 09/12/2018, notice of which has been given to the defendant. 

The defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and s default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

The claimant also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the Country  Courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% pa from the date of the assignment of the agreement to 29/11/2019 being an amount of £86.88 

 

Total amount they are now claiming is £521.50

 

How can we deal with this claim against my wife as the loan was taken out in 2013 and no payments were paid to Payday UK not to BW Legal when they stated to send emails and letters. I under we have set time frames to reply to the court letter and need to sort out ASAP

 

Sorry yes it was a payday loan taken out on 13/10/2013 

 

I can confirm the loan was taken out on 1/10/2013 and payable in full on 31/10/2013 this never happened.

Had few emails during 2014 then nothing until 2017 that`s when BW Legal started emailing and few letters.

 

 

Defence - Simple Statue Barred based on loan taken out on 1/10/2013 never repaid nor acknowledged, also they state date of 09/12/2016 never had anything ?  


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues Forum...please complete the following link by reading and copying the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/357877-you-have-received-a-claim-issued-in-england-wales-what-you-need-to-do-updated-jan-2019/

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL

name of claimant - PRAC  

 

date of claimform -  2nd December 2019

 

What is the claim for – 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The claimants claim is for the sum of £349.77 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a loan agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and Instant Cash Loans Ltd T/A Payday UK under account reference xxxxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 09/12/2018, notice of which has been given to the defendant. 

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and s default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

3.The claimant also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the Country  Courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% pa from the date of the assignment of the agreement to 29/11/2019 being an amount of £86.88 

 

Total amount they are now claiming is £521.65

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? - yes

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No 

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? - No as never moved address


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? -  Payday Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? - 1st October 2013

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? - On line

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? - No

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. -Prac

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? - 

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - No 

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? - No 

 

Why did you cease payments? - Unemployment 

 

What was the date of your last payment? - Never repaid after taking out the loan payment due for repayment on 31/10/2013 payment not made to claimant

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? - No 

 

Now we have submitted the AOS and the date of the court claim form is 2nd December 2019

i have 33 days to submit the defence details,

also sending request to the lender & BW legal as well,

they won`t reply but will request.

 

Anything else we can do at this stage

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Payday UK Repayment plan

can I just confirm both yourself and your wife had loans from paydayuk?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the fact the loan was taken out 1/10/2013 and not repaid on the date 31/10/2013,  will it fall under as Statue Barred.

 

i submitted the AOS ticking All will be defended on 04/12/2019

 

i will be sending SAR & CCA to the lender and Lovells is this correct as they won`t reply 

 

Also when do we submit the defence and what to write are there any templates

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was enquiring because I found an earlier thread going back before the date you indicate this loan started with payments made.

 

so just to be clear,

you had a loan from Paydayuk before this one currently under litigation taken out by your wife?

you don't sar 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well scroll back to post 1 here and read a past thread ive merged in here.

 

It appears to me you must have had an earlier loan in your name?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok but im just checking

as I know how scatty you can be and end up get things mixed up throughout your threads here

 

if you are sure its no been paid

then:

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
.
 get a CCA Request running to the claimant
https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/
 leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed
.
.
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
.
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
…………..

 

there is also nothing to stop you filing our SB defence today either

 

he following defence is all you need if it is SB

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 
.
If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
..
..ends..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent CCA request today by recorded delivery to the claimant and CPR 31:14 to the solicitor / company BW Legal as well.  i  will be filing defence based on SB barred soon or do we wait to see if they reply. 

 

Based on submitting the AOS on 4/12/2019 via MCOL last night we have 33 day or sooner

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt is SB'd then there is no need to wait

whatever paperwork they hold is immaterial if you are 1000% sure its SB'd.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home to letter from BW Legal 

 

States we must reply to them now as they have sent court papers and if we don`t agree by 28th December a repayment plan the court will confirm the CCJ adding more cost and charges. And the CCJ will ruin my wifes credit. etc etc 

 

I will submit defence based on statue barred over the weekend, 

 

Loan processed 1/10/2013 - I have email confirmation

Loan deferral 26/10/2013 -  I have email confirmation

Loan payment failed 31/10/2013 - I have email confirmation

Email from claimant Jan 2014 - Confirming no payment

 

Next B W Legal 2017 email reminders 17/05/2017 & 19/06/2019

 

I have been reading letter as kept everything, had letter from PRAC on 13/02/2017 saying they have purchased the debt from Payday UK. They sent annual statement saying the original agreement date 9/12/2016 wrong date as the loan was date 1/10/2013.

 

Had email from Payday UK on 1/12/2014 saying we can pay via paypoint same account number as court papers, so confirms PRAC have enter the wrong date on the paperwork.

 

Just need to put into a defence case

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You either file sb as written or drop the whole sb defence

you cannot mix sb with anything else

its absolute

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your correct, will be filing defence based on statue barred, just need to see how to word the SB defence.

 

Once i have file the defence how long is it before we hear from the court, do we have to attend the court ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb defence is already my post 36

you cant mix it with anything!! use the exact defence wording/format I listed there only simply copy and paste to mcol website

your defence filing by date is also clearly outlined

 

if or if not you have to attend your LOCAL county court [which you specify in the N180 the court sends] 

is solely down to if the claimant if they want to risk pushing the case that far.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what to ensure i submit correctly 

 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date). Question is this the date the loan was taken out 

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh? simple enough question...

 

The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

what date was the claim issued on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date on the court paper is 2nd December 2019, this is the information i will file / submit 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2nd December 2019.

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Question - Will we need to confirm date when the loan was first taken out or is it up to the claimant to prove that information.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you added the blue line I've highlighted?

that's not in the we gave you.

 

as for your question...

PRAC's roboclaim computer knows when the account was taken out, after all it raised the claim and checked everything carefully first before issuing the request via northants bulk courts equally inept roboclaim computer... 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have change text to same colour, my defence is listed below 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2nd December 2019.

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

 

Stranger if they know the loan was taken out on 1/10/2013 the should know it`s now SB, i have already sent CCA and CPR 31:14, filing in the defence on Sunday night

 

Fingers crossed but think they will still keep pushing for payment, think its a matter of filing and waiting

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why have you added in the blue bit...????

 

it is not part of CAG's SB defence that was given to you......:frusty::crazy:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think just getting confused about the whole filing and what to actual write ( Sorry) 

 

Think listed below is ok file plain and simple

 

Defence

 

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2/12/2019.

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant

.

 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheer2:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...