Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unknown Intrum CCJ for Amigo Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1645 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

i have a debt that will become statute barred in March.

I have read posts and people have said that after 6 years it completely drops off your credit report.

Is this the case?

Can mortgage providers see a debt on Experian that has been made statute barred

 

 I am trying to get all debts cleared to have the best chance of improving my credit score in order to get a mortgage next year.

 

The main debt is now with Intrium (formerly 1st credit) that’s for £5330

 

The smaller debt of £700 is with a legal company but the debt was originally with Money Shop.

 

I haven’t requested any evidence from them relating to the debts.

The £700 debt is due to be statute barred in March so I have not responded to their letter.

 

Regards

Veteran6224

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't need to clear your debts if they don't show as defaulted or not at all on your credit file.

 

as for intrum

they like any other DCA are fleecing debt buyers that get your debt for less than 10p=£1 then fleece you for the whole lot

 

so , tell me why the original creditor didn't take you to court and crush you...?

why sell your debt on ..on the cheap...makes you think a bit.

  

as for the muppets that now have that PDL debt...

ever thought about raising an irresponsible lending claim against the original creditor

because as with many PDL , now paid off or not

they probably shouldn't have lent you the money in the first place as you couldn't afford it and your credit file was a poor score.

 

click here and read a few threads

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?173-Debt-management-and-Debt-self-help

you'll soon get the idea that these DCA's you've already paid off have had a lovely xmas from your free money.

 

statute barring and debts showing or not on your credit file are not linked.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great I will hold out then,

 

I registered with Equifax last night and the Intrum debt is on there as a CCJ and has 2/3 years before it become statute barred but the £700 one becomes SB after June this year.

 

I have mentioned previously that my partner and I (she has a great credit rating) are looking to apply for a mortgage in early 2020.

 

Can anyone tell me the best route to be accepted for a mortgage in regards to debts and defaults etc?

 

Do we satisfy them to show the mortgage company we’re addressing the debt?

I could clear all my debts by May this year.

 

I have a £2500 credit card with a full limit (Aqua) so was going to spend a small amount each month and pay the balance in full to boost my credit score.

 

We have a substantial deposit and affordability is there it’s just the defaults/CCJ etc I am concerned will be an issue.

Anyone with mortgage experience that can help would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks in advance

Veteran6224

 

I am also sending a CCA to Intrum and the other debt next week

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ccj never becomes sb'd

Why didnt you state the ccj in the first place

 

Dont send intrum anything!!

they are not chasing you??

 

A defaulted date in a debts summary or a ccj are there for 6yrs regardless to if you are paying or not ..paid it or not.

 

So are you paying intrum?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only realised it was a CCJ when I registered with Equifax last night.

I have been paying Intrum £50 a month for the last 12 months but have the money to clear it if I needed to.

So it’s best that any debt showing as a default or CCJ on my file should be paid/satisfied prior to applying for a mortgage?

 

I had another debt for £2500 that was with High Court Enforcement Group that I paid off last month and have been told I need to apply for a letter of satisfaction from the county court it was registered with.

 

Thanks for merging the posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I owe:

 

- Intrum £5300 CCJ (original company Amigo Loans) paying £50 a month at present

- Prac Financials limited £708 Default (original company Money Shop) not communicated at any point and debt is SB soon. Default date was 27/06/2013

 

Settled/satisfied debts are:

 

High Court Enforcement Group £2758 CCJ (original company was England and Company) paid in full and settled

 

My credit report via Experian shows no defaults or CCJ’s, my credit report on Equifax shows defaults for the above mentioned unpaid debts (Intrum & Prac Financial)

 

To my knowledge I have no other debts, I have not had any letters from any other companies chasing me.

 

Regards

Veteran6224

3AE3B54B-D068-4BEF-BF88-42C820BC9A5B.jpeg

7DCB794D-F3E0-4D37-A508-4E2947453087.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

One multipage pdf please

Read upload

So we can zoom please

 

the amigo loans CCJ..

was this a tomlin order?

how did you arrange the £50PCM..told by the judge?

 

England and Company>??? who are they? a business debt?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I am not sure what a tomlin order is? The £50pcm was set up by me Making them an offer as they were chasing my guarantor.

 

England and company are an offshore accountancy firm in Jersey, I worked offshore and they were the accountants we used and I left the job but the accountancy fees were still owed and I didn’t realise. So they placed the high court writ with HCE Group

 

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

were you aware that amigo got the CCJ?

or heard or knew nothing about it till your guarantor spoke to you and you found it out?

 

as for the accountancy stuff, HCE group could never have been involved unless a CCJ was awarded...and again you knew nothing about one being awarded??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi everyone, I am with a mortgage consultant tomorrow.

They have recommended that I pay off my final debt (First Credit) in full.

 

I have been paying off monthly and there is £3400 left.

I have heard that if you pay in full you can request that they remove the default from your file.

Is this true?

If so is there a letter template that I can use?

Thanks in advance 

 

regards

j

Link to post
Share on other sites

total rubbish paying a debt off means you can get the default removed.

 

you could make it a condition of the F&F that the account is totally removed

but I very much doubt they will agree to that.

even though 1st credit [intrum] are a dca.

 

the default vanishes after 6yrs anyway regardless.

 

have you sent intrum a CCA request?

very rare for Amigo to sell their defaulted loans on 

they usually litigate.

there must be some really good reason why they did this 

find it!

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

not a good idea yet IMHO.

 

them not having an enforceable CCA

[quite probable ]

 

will put you in a far a stronger position

 

is this a mainstream mortgage advisor and a mainstream mortgage ?

or some tinpot backstreet private broker?

ONE default should not harm any success with mainstream lenders if you approach them yourself directly.

 

not saying yours is but MANY brokers/advisors/IFA's actually have links into many DCA and get back handers for settling debts that don't legally need to be settled.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't know of any mainstream lenders that refuse a good rate mortgage for one default.

 

IMHO something smells.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, it seems we have some options so fingers crossed. The larger of the 2 debts is set to be SB on the 11th next month. Once this date arrives should I send a letter to Moneybarn to request it be removed? I have sent Moneybarn and 1st Credit/Intrum a CCA request today. 
 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how are you deeming SB date?

accounts are removed on the defaults 6th birthday

those 2  dates rarely meet 

the latter being the important one

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Unknown Intrum CCJ for Amigo Loan
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...