Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anglian Water Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have complained to Resolver and have been to Citizens Advice.

 

At the moment I am complaining direct with Anglian Water.

Anglian Water have sent a Spreadsheet concerning a debt which was applied to my daughter's account (almost 1, 500 ) in 2009.

The debt was addressed to my daughter, but it wasn't her Account no.

The debt lay dormant for 2 years then was reintroduced and added to her new account.

 

In 2012 the debt had increased to almost (4,000 ) had increased to.

My daughter moved to a new property in December 2008 and Anglian Water had been billing her for her old property until September 2009.

 

They state that she did not inform them that she had moved out.

They said they had no records whatsoever of her new address.

 

Both are lies, my daughter has a bill and 3 payment booklets for the new address.

My daughter was making payments for the new address at the same time AW were billing her for the old address.

 

The Account No which the debt was issued wasn't,t my daughter's.

AW then said that due to a system update in 2006 my daughter MAY have been issued with a new one.

As my daughter has mental health issues , she is on benefits.

 

Between 2013 -2019 my daughter has paid over 3.000 which has been taken at source from her Benefits.

She moved into a new address on December 16th 2013.

The debt wasn't added to her AW account until 21st October 2015.

 

They said she moved without telling them and they had to trace her.

Which is also a lie as she has all the bills for her new address.

 

Anglian Water have been taking payments of 50 pound a month as well as an extra one.

In 2013 she paid 720 pound.

 

What is also something that I never seen before , her Account no for her current address is exactly the same as her old address.

Anglian Water have been taking 13 payments a year for five years.

The debt for five years has remained at over 2.000 pound.

It went down to 1.800 this year.

 

Anglian water reduced it, they have taken 540 pound it.

My daughter has every bill and letters dating back to 2003.

The spreadsheet is all lies from the start.

It's full of deliberate maladministration and misrepresentation.

 

I have enough evidence but I need advice as to the best way forward.

I need an independent investigation.

 

I'm not sure whether to report it as fraud to the police and take it to Court.

My daughter's has been to hell and back with it.

 

Please Advise me on the best way to get this dealt with.

That debt letter is one of many.

It was issued to her at the same time as all the payments were being taken

Many Thanks

Melinda

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the utils forum

had to remove your pictures as they are unredacted

please read upload and only use PDF 

 

its a bit difficult to understand the story 

but ive spaced the post to add paragraphs in

forget resolver its useless

forget CAN they are useless.

 

have you approached the regulator ofwat?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't been to Ofwat yet.

Only because when I went on their website it said that they don't really take on individual complaints.

They said contact Consumer Council for water.

 

I don't know how good they are.

I tried to sort this out in 2017.

I was treated pretty much as I am being now and I gave up for a while.

This is making my daughter really I'll, so I have to sort it this time.

 

According to the statements and spreadsheet you would think that my daughter never paid her bills for years.

AW state that she never rang them to inform them that,  she had either moved in or out of a property.

 

Emma's water bills in a new property all have a carried forward amount from her previous addresses on them, if she hadn't informed them, her bills would start from a nil amounts.

 

I'm not going to stop until it's sorted out this time.

It's nearly 10 years since it started.

 

There is something else that I'm not 100% sure about.

AW introduced the debt on the bill for her 3rd property.

Within weeks she was receiving debt letters threatening Court action.

4 debt companies and one from AW.

I thought that a debt company bought bad debts.

 

I was really surprised when my daughter moved into her current property.

There was a carried forward amount of £4.65 to pay on her previous property..

 

The first bill for the new property was 27.00.

Fifteen months later and a debt of 2,081p was added to her bill.

 

I don't know if the debt collector letters were just sent to scare her.

It makes no sense to me that a Company can do this to someone.

 

We have no confidence in them , yet it's the only water company in our area,

 

Thank You for responding 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no a dca can be used to chased for their clients

all totally powerless of couse.

 

can you do a bullet point timescale please.

the story is very difficult to understand.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

she should have never set up a DD so she then controlled what money they got. Stop the DD now

It isnt fraud, it is just incompetence and to rectify that she will probably have to sue them for the return of the money owed.

BTW, you can do nothing, it isnt your account. By all means be supportive and do all the research but she has to take control of her own affairs

Edited by ericsbrother
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have Authorisation to Act on her Behalf.

It isn't a DD.

She is on ESA due to mental health .

It has been taken at source from her benefits.

 

When she moved addresses she requested payment booklets to pay her bill until the payments from her benefits were set up. 

 

1/ She lived at 1st address from 2002 and had a payment plan set up. 

 

2/ She didn't realise at the time,  she received 2 bills 2007/2008 that her Account no had been changed. As the bill with 2nd account number was an exact copy of her bills under her own account no.

 

3/ The debt from the new account no lay dormant for a number of years.

 

4/ In 2013 she made payments totalling nearly £800, at the same time she received 7 bills. All with conflicting amounts and dates. She also received 4 letters from debt collectors threatening court action. She also received 3 threatening letters from Anglian water for an amount of £60, at the same time received another from Anglian water for £2081. 

 

5/ The debt of £2081 was added to her Anglian Water Account in Feb 2015, as AW insisted that she hadn't informed them when she moved out of her property. If that was the case then how did they manage to send her a letter in 2013 threatening court action over £2081.

 

6/ It seems that she has two sets of bills , one with and one without the debt.

 

7/ The account no she has now is the same account number used from her previous property. Which is something I've never heard of before. Especially as the previous property was based on Rateable Value, her new property has an alleged water meter. This is also in dispute.

 

8// She was told her new property didn't have a water meter, the bill is based on Rateable Value. Her Tenancy Agreement doesn't show a meter. All her bills suggest a water meter is fitted. 

 

9/ AW have reduced the debt by £540, but having checked all her bills, letters and payments, I don't believe that she should owe anything. I believe that she has overpaid AW a considerable amount. I am currently escalating the complaint for an independent Investigation.

 

Many Thanks for taking time to respond . 

MadGiz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Benefit deductions can be for arrears (previous years water debts) and current water usage.

 

So on the ESA statement it could show say £50 as a deduction, but this could be towards arrears and current water bill.  When Anglian received the £50 it would simply state towards account no. 12345678 and it would be up to Anglian how they applied the £50. I suspect they would apply the amount required towards the current water bill monthly amount and the rest towards arrears.

 

Anglian should on request provide a full breakdown of the debt owing, as an account showing bills owed and payments received towards the bills.  If they provide a full breakdown in date order, it might be possible to account for any errors.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...