Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/shoos claimform - yorkshire bank OD - stayed 4yrs - now SJ threat


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1754 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Andy,

 

Brilliant, thank you for this, it's really appreciated.  I'll submit this to the court this week.  Then just sit and wait until the 10th for the hearing.  I might have a few more questions nearer the time, about the process, but I'll have a break from this for a few days.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

claimants sols

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

Received this on Friday, after submitted statement to court and to shoosmiths, which they received today, so I'm not sure what they are trying to prove now.  I'm guessing it's just another frightener, to highlight how much more it will cost me.  Any thoughts?

 

Thanks

costs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite normal.....doubt they would get a 3rd of that if successful...still its their choice to  litigate on random disputed statute barred debts.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Wednesday's the day.  The closer it's getting, the more nervous I'm starting to feel.  Although I sort of know what to expect, is there anything I should know or do to prepare?

 

What exactly do I need to do during the hearing? 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much to do during the hearing except answer questions as the Judge asks...it will be over very swiftly so make sure what you state is worthwhile and good enough to deny them their application...you only get one shot at this...make it count...say your piece and dont clam up with nerves....stick to your statement and make the judge ask the claimant why they did what they did......and whats the reasoning.

 

Statute barred will be the focus...as defendants 2 default judgment is a none starter as they served to a previous address knowing full well the current address and serving your to the correct.

 

Best of luck

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another letter from them on Friday with a counter argument to my witness statement and a revised (increased) charges sheet, I’ll not bother uploading it.

 

So am I right in thinking that the judge will have read all the evidence beforehand and will have a good idea of what the outcome will be

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fixed costs in small claims

1.1 Under Rule 27.14 the costs which can be awarded to a claimant in a small claim include the fixed costs payable under Part 45 attributable to issuing the claim.

1.2 Those fixed costs are the sum of –

(a) the fixed commencement costs calculated in accordance with Table 1 of Rule 45.2;

(b) the appropriate court fee or fees paid by the claimant.

 

With regards to the Judge being prepared and reading all the evidence.....its your duty to question him and ask ...

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy 

 

just noticed while preparing what I’m going to say tomorrow that the account number they are claiming on is the incorrect one, so doesn’t match the bank statements they sent, I don’t know how I missed it but does that leave their argument worthless, even though I haven’t mentioned it in any statements

 

Every letter they have sent and the account number they referenced in their statements are wrong.

Edited by robingetz
Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant well spotted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply state to the judge that you/we have never held an account with the agreement referred to by the claimant.....but you wish to defend the application irrespective until such time the claimant can confirm the correct account number,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

judge lottery sadly.??

you can never protect against that.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are all in it together, the judge and solicitor spoke as if they were best friends before the hearing, and to me as if I was something she stood in.

 

Not exactly surprised, no faith in the justice system 

 

Is that the end of it, is there nothing now I can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you not appeal?

if the statements of payments do not match the litigated account number surely they cant be correct?

 

have we seen them?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe but I have put so much on here I don’t know for sure.  I’ll put them on later.  I still find it unbelievable that the wrong account number was not considered 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge wasn't called Judge Shoosmith by any chance ? :roll:

 

You will have to expand if you want any feedback Robin  ...no mention of false service...statute barred...?

 

DId you both get CCJs ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

She was obviously on good terms with their solicitor, I must have just been unlucky on the day to get her, she clearly had no time for us.

 

It's difficult to expand without showing you the documents involved in full, as I have to remove any identifiers and the fine detail, so if there is any private section of this forum were you can view the full documents, I am happy to upload them.

 

However the main points that I got from this experience were.

1. It wasn't as relaxed and informal as I expected, which threw me into panic mode straight away.

2. The judge and solicitor used a lot of legal terms, and to be honest I was out of my depth, and should have maybe had a legal rep myself.

3. She dismissed the fact that the account number on all the letters from them was different to the account number on my statements, because I hadn't mentioned it before the hearing, I just noticed it myself the day before, and said she believed that the 2 account numbers were from the same account.

4. She was more interested in grilling me as to why I had left the overdraft at the time unpaid, then put me under oath to swear that I never made those payments, and threatened me with contempt of court if I lied.

5. She wouldn't let me answer on my wife's behalf and grilled her, she didn't know what to say as I had been sorting this out, so she agreed to the default judgement, and never wanted to be there in the first place, she was obviously distressed, judge never questioned us or solicitor about the letters being sent to her to a previous address.

6. So both defences were struck out and both given CCJ's, so ordered to pay the full amount (which will go to a debt collector, which annoys me more, I'd rather give it Yorkshire Bank) and costs of £1500.

 

I knew within minutes of the hearing that it wasn't going to go our way.

 

In hindsight I would have researched more and prepared more, but it's the first time I have been in that situation, and thought the judge would have been more sympathetic, but you learn by experience.

 

I plan to appeal as I believe I was stitched up, but I also will pay to avoid a CCJ, I don't need being lumbered with that for 6 years, and I will seek legal advice and be more prepared.  I have sent Yorkshire a SAR to see if they come up with anymore information, but I don't know if they will still have anything 13 years since the account was closed.

 

Thank you for all your help on this forum, it's invaluable.

Edited by robingetz
Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally wouldn't throw any good money after bad...you most probably would get the same Judge and your appeal application dismissed.(you have to request permission to appeal) We cant prepare for Judge Lottery circumstances in these cases and can only hope they  are weeded out over time and consumers get a fairer justice system...there are good Judges out there who implement Credit Consumer Law in accordance with the Act...but far and few between.

 

Pay it and move on and learn form this.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well she wasn't interested in the debt being Statute Barred...or the fact they used a previous address to attain default judgment whilst knowing the current address...far more significant points than the wrong accounts number being referred to in its particulars.

 

Appeals are based on error of law being applied...although they should be based on lack of common sense and the Judge applying their own opinion....but sadly not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK fair enough, probably won't bother.  Out of interest how long do you have to appeal?

 

So, if I pay within a month, the CCJ won't appear on my credit file, is this correct?

 

And, can you negotiate a lesser amount as full and final settlement and not have the CCJ registered, or is the amount final and non-negotiable?  

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct if paid by the date stated......you can then request a Certificate of Satisfaction if you wish from the court.

 

No you cant negotiate a fresh Judgment amount...possibly if you refused to pay them and after 4 years if they have not tried to execute the judgment in the meantime they may consider a F&FS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...