Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

So the AA count miles through mid air not in road miles?


Craigbadger

Recommended Posts

Seems a bit surreal

have just been denied a breakdown because the car was within 1/4 mile of my home despite being 0.4 miles by road.

 

If I want to claim I have to pay £60 now + add £6 a month to my policy.

 

Ive had a look at the policy and it states within 1/4 mile.

Nothing about it being measured in pigeon miles.

 

I'd go as far as to say the whole things crazy.

 

I guess what i'm wondering is do I have any grounds for complaint?,

luckily my dad has been able to recover on his but its still a major inconvenience

and I just cant get the logic other than them deliberately trying to get out of a recovery.

 

They are a road company that even offer navigation services yet measure through the sky when it suits.

 

Rant over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they use shortest road distance

which is a bit debatable or could be..at the best of times..

 

how else do can you expect distance to be measured...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your question, yes i'd expect it to be the shortest road route.

 

They even have a route planner on the site so go with the approach that whatever that says goes.

 

I actually cant think of many other times in life you would measure distance in a direct line and not how far you would have to travel to get from a>b.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven’t provided any definition Of how they calculate the distance in their terms?

 

Then any interpretation will be in your favour and as per what a reasonable person/consumer would think which is by road

 

I.e M, A, B, unnamed roads and not by plane/drone/pigeon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put a directions from London to Reading in google maps and see if it gives you the distance in radials. I think not. The only time I see radials on a map is the blast zone of a nuclear bomb, never seen it on any map relating to traffic, insurance, telematics etc anyway as they haven’t defined it then it must be defined to the benefit of the consumer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put a directions from London to Reading in google maps and see if it gives you the distance in radials. I think not. The only time I see radials on a map is the blast zone of a nuclear bomb, never seen it on any map relating to traffic, insurance, telematics etc anyway as they haven’t defined it then it must be defined to the benefit of the consumer

 

Check out delivery zones from couriers....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out delivery zones from couriers....

 

 

Maybe, but then you know what the delivery zone is before you conclude the contract. They cannot come after the fact and say this is how we define the zone and tough luck that’s the end of the matter. If you know before because it’s defined in the terms or on their website then fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...