Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dukes Bailiff Help CTAX debt of person not at my address***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Need some advise.

 

Our eldest daughter has left her house without paying any council tax or rent for ages.

 

She is living at a friends house but i genuinely do not know were she lives

 

We have some how gotten her debt collection letters which we have returned and this morning we had three letters from the same place, curiosity got the better of me and i opened one.

 

Dukes Bailiffs notice of enforcement !!

 

typically they are closed now - have spoke to the police and they say its civil but how do i stop these morons from coming here?

 

The facts

 

Same surname but has never lived at this address - not on the electoral register.

 

All the letters come c/o to her

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have traced her to your address, as presumably on some database she is linked to your address.

 

Speak to Dukes on Monday. If you have anything official confirming who lives at your address, perhaps you can send them a copy.

 

You don't have to tell them the address where your Daughter is currently living.

 

If you are speaking to your Daughter, suggest that she needs to deal with it or risks being asked to attend a court to explain why she is not paying.

 

Do you live in England or Scotland ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't stop them.

They have a warrant in their possession which means that they have to eventually call round to observe the conditions of the Court instructions.

 

 

One way to minimise their effect would be to explain what you said to us above, let them in to prove that she does not live with you.

The problem that could arise with that is if you have other daughters living with you.

 

It should help if you make a Statuary Declaration to the effect that your daughter does not live with you nor does she have any possessions there either. It will not stop them coming once to confirm as far as they can that she is not there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lookingforinfo has stated the correct position.

 

A warrant is an order from the court to the enforcement agent instructing him to 'take control of goods' belonging to the person named on the warrant (in this case your daughter).

 

You have not given much background information. For instance, could it be the case that your daughter provided your address as a 'care off' address when moving from her previous address?

 

Enforcement companies are very reliant upon 'tracing' facilities to trace debtors. For example, they may have discovered that your daughter applied for credit (a mobile phone contract is a good example) using your address. She may also have used your address for an application for benefits etc.

 

Either way, you cannot simply ignore the correspondence hoping that it will go away. It may help to speak with the council on Monday. They may cite the Data Protection stating that the rules do not allow them to speak with you but then again, they may be very helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

generally a warrant is served on the address as ordered by the court rather than any address they think is connected

 

 

usually this is the address of the property that the CT is owed on or a permanent address as per the electoral roll.

 

 

It would be worth checking with the court as to what address the warrant is issued for because the bailiffs may have gone to that address and the current occupier has given them your address.

 

 

If that is the case then the council has to go back to court and get the warrant varied for the new address and your declaration that she is not living or associated with your address should stop them trying to enforce there..

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the section of the act which relates to premises where the bailiff can call.

Section 14 (schedule12)

(6)

Otherwise premises are relevant if the enforcement agent reasonably believes that they are the place, or one of the places, where the debtor—

(a)

usually lives, or

 

So what you have to do is remove anything would leave them to believe your daughter lives there.

 

A sworn notice as mentioned earlier would do the trick, I would think.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

generally a warrant is served on the address as ordered by the court rather than any address they think is connected

 

 

usually this is the address of the property that the CT is owed on or a permanent address as per the electoral roll.

 

 

It would be worth checking with the court as to what address the warrant is issued for because the bailiffs may have gone to that address and the current occupier has given them your address.

 

 

If that is the case then the council has to go back to court and get the warrant varied for the new address and your declaration that she is not living or associated with your address should stop them trying to enforce there..

 

Eric this is not about serving a warrant, the warrant is served to the bailiff, he then enforces it. It confers on him the right to use the procedure.(schedule12)

 

I should add in these cases it is an order not a warrant, as it is an enactment which forms the power not a court judgement.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your replies.

 

Just to confirm she has never lived here and the letters are coming to her as c/o

 

Im guessing he council have used our address because her son has been removed from her care and placed into ours. There is a long line of letters coming from the social workers to us.

 

I can post the letter with all the names and account numbers removed if it helps?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send al proof to the bailiff and copy it to the council.

 

It is unfortunate that some bailiffs sometimes use thee methods to fish for a debtors address, this is against guidance and the council may intervene.

, but I would give the bailiff a chance to respond.

 

In the mean time, if one should call do not let him in, and as inconvenient as it may be , I would not have my car anywhere near the house until all this is resolved.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

House is now on lockdown until its sorted out.

 

My car is a company car and registered to Lex Autolease and the wife's car is on finance so i hope that keeps them clear?

 

just worried that they are going to get entry some how and say - prove the TV isnt you daughters, prove the laptop isnt your daughters etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to disagree with this I am afraid. This forum is full of cases where bailiffs have taken goods first and asked questions afterword's. Particularly when a clamp is used. Besides I would not want to put myself in situation where I had to explain anything to a bailiff stood outside my door, keep them out of the way, just for now.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your replies.

 

Just to confirm she has never lived here and the letters are coming to her as c/o

 

Im guessing he council have used our address because her son has been removed from her care and placed into ours. There is a long line of letters coming from the social workers to us.

 

I can post the letter with all the names and account numbers removed if it helps?

 

Thanks again

 

If you mean that you can post the letters on the forum (with all personal information removed) this is not at all necessary.

 

There is clearly 'history' here and I would be very surprised indeed if this matter cannot be resolved very simply with the council on Monday. If not, please do post back.

 

PS: Unless you are tempted to invite the enforcement agent into your home (not to be recommended in this particular case), then the matter of your TV and computers is not an issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed.

 

Bailiffs can enforce between 6 am and 9 pm, so unless you stand shotgun over your vehicles , well.

 

Also there is a big difference between, what in an opinion of a website adviser bailiff should do, and what they can do. Especially when it all hinges on the belief of the enforcement officer. All you can do is present proof at the scene, if he disagrees he can continue, then it is a matter for a court, with all the upheaval that contains.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the cars away, and do not let rthe bailiff in.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

 

Spoke to Dukes on the Monday after my post, they were weirdly helpful.

 

All action has been stopped and referred back to the council

 

Wife took a day off work and went to the council and complained - they are still unsure who or what linked our address but they have apologised.

 

Still keeping an eye out for anyone knocking at my door but thats probably my paranoia

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, seems their little fishing trip has been terminated.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The enforcement company would have referred the account back to their client as they are likely satisfied that your daughter does not live at your property. Well done to Duke's.

 

Hmmm :)

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...