Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oh I see! thats confusing, for some reason the terms and conditions that Evri posted in that threads witness statement are slightly different than the t&cs on packlinks website. Their one says enter into a contract with the transport agency, but the website one says enter into a contract with paclink. via website: (c) Each User will enter into a contract with Packlink for the delivery of its Goods through the chosen Transport Agency. via evri witness statement in that thread: (c) Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency I read your post at #251, so I should use the second one (and changing the screenshot in the court bundle), since I am saying I have a contract with Evri? Is that correct EDIT: Oh I understand the rest of your conversation. you're saying if I was to do this i would have to fully adjust my ws to use the consumer rights act instead of rights of third parties. In that case should I just edit the terms and stick with the third parties plan?. And potentially if needed just bring up the CRA in the hearing, as you guys did in that thread  
    • First, those are the wrong terms,  read posts 240-250 of the thread ive linked to Second donough v stevenson should be more expanded. You should make refernece to the three fold duty of care test as well. Use below as guidance: The Defendant failed its duty of care to the Claimant. As found in Donoghue v Stevenson negligence is distinct and separate to any breach of contract. Furthermore, as held in the same case there need not be a contract between the Claimant and the Defendant for a duty to be established, which in the case of the Claimant on this occasion is the Defendant’s duty of care to the Claimant’s parcel whilst it is in their possession. By losing the Claimant’s parcel the Defendant has acted negligently and breached this duty of care. As such the Claimant avers that even if it is found that the Defendant not be liable in other ways, by means of breach of contract, should the court find there is no contract between Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant would still have rise to a claim on the grounds of the Defendant’s negligence and breach of duty of care to his parcel whilst it was in the Defendant’s possession, as there need not be a contract to give rise to a claim for breach of duty of care.  The court’s attention is further drawn to Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990), 2 AC 605 in which a three fold test was used to determine if a duty of care existed. The test required that: (i) Harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct; (ii) A relationship of proximity must exist and (iii) It must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.  
    • Thank you. here's the changes I made 1) removed indexed statement of truth 2) added donough v Stevenson in paragraph 40, just under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 paragraph about reasonable care and skill. i'm assuming this is a good place for it? 3) reworded paragraph 16 (now paragraph 12), and moved the t&cs paragraphs below it then. unless I understood you wrong it seems to fit well. or did you want me to remove the t&cs paragraphs entirely? attached is the updated draft, and thanks again for the help. WS and court bundle-1 fourth draft redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Buying a freehold garage on leasehold land


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Garages don't come up for sale very often round here but there's a freehold one for sale just now. It's at the back of a block of flats which are leasehold and the driveway / tarred area to the garages would come under that leasehold.

 

The seller hasn't paid any fees or service charge for the past 6 years. Can anyone give me advice please without me going to the expense of hiring a solicitor?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not what you want to hear, but i'd not do anything without a conveyancing solictor's advice. It's a potential minefield covenants on the land etc. The picture you paint sounds like you'd be buying an island of land surrounded by someonelse's with the potential of them blocking access.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll have to see what covenants are in the deeds as suggested by gregs07.

Usually in these situations you have right of passage through the land leading to the garage.

It is not unusual that a contribution for the maintenance of this passage is required.

In some cases this contribution is in the form of an annual fee to a management company (this doesn't seem the case) or the maintenance is left to the leaseholders of such passage and whomever has interest in it by deeds (potentially you).

Best thing to do is to purchase the entry record from land registry and pass it to a specialised solicitor to check it out.

Truly, you don't want to buy a garage today and be asked a few thousand tomorrow to fix the area surrounding it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not a freehold garage, it is a leasehold garage. The building belongs to the lessee so when the lease expires they have to take it away leaving the land bare for the freeholder.

So, if you buy the garage the lease will hopefully be assigned to you and you can enjoy it as you would a leasehold flat but you will need a solicitor to pick through all of the terms as often the lease cannot be simply assigned so it may be economically unviable

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to be updated on what your solicitor feels the position is.

 

I'm not sure how one can be certain if the garage is freehold or leasehold without seeing the LR documents.

 

The garage doesn't have to be leasehold : it is feasible the freeholder sold off the freehold (with the access over the land that has subsequently become leased, via benefit of covenant(s) granting the garage owner access to the garage)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say "The land has the benefit of the following rights granted by a transfer of the land blah blah blah TOGETHER WITH a right of way at all times in common with the transferor and all other authorised by it with or without vehicles over and along the roadway shown and hatched brown on the said plan"

 

I will however update you on what the final verdict is once it's in the hands of my solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you have right of passage, so the freeholder of the land surrounding the garage cannot block your access.

We need to know if there's any covenants imposing the maintenance of this access on the garage freeholder.

That's the key point.

Have a look at the area and if you think that at one point they would build properties on it, maintenance or not, you could be in for a jackpot: They won't build properties around the garage and leave it in the middle of the development, but they would most likely buy it off you.

If that ever happens, you could negotiate a rip off price and walk away happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only bit in the covenants that stands out (to me) is

 

"that he the purchaser will on demand pay a fair proprotion of all charges for renewing or repairing the ..........Road pavements, sewers and drains which shall be used in common by the occupiers of the land hereby conveyed and of any adjoining premises until such road, pavements, sewers and drains are taken to by the proper authorities the amount of such proportion to be fixed in default of agreement by a sole arbitrator to be appointed under the Arbitration Act 1889 or any statutory modifications or reenactment thereof for the time being in force PROVIDED ALWAYS that in assessing the sum to be paid by the purchaser rgard shall be had to the frontage of the land hereby conveyed on .............Road and the extent of the use of such road by the purchaser to the intent that the purchaser shall not be called upon to pay for wear and tear of the road caused by building operations therein by any person or persons.

 

The road in question above is a public side road which I imagine is adopted by the local council.

 

PS I don't think there is any chance of the garages being knocked down to make way for a dwelling although it does state that one "not of less value than one thousand two hundred pounds" Hah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will,- when you buy the Lease for a free-standing property. Also expect a water rate from the Water Co.

Round here such garages are demolished for Housing.

Why did you decide to buy the Lease for this garage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will,- when you buy the Lease for a free-standing property. Also expect a water rate from the Water Co.

Round here such garages are demolished for Housing.

Why did you decide to buy the Lease for this garage?

 

It's a freehold garage as per title apparently

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the bit about the leasehold flats is completely irrelevant and we are talking about a freehold piece of land with a garage on it. This makes a big difference so please confirm the ownership status of the land

 

I think it is a bit unfair to say "the bit about the leasehold flats is completely irrelevant and we are talking about a freehold piece of land with a garage on it."

 

The OP was quite clear:

Garages don't come up for sale very often round here but there's a freehold one for sale just now. It's at the back of a block of flats which are leasehold and the driveway / tarred area to the garages would come under that leasehold.

 

So the garage is freehold, and the status of the access to the garage (over the flats land, which is leaseheld) IS relevant. It would be important for a purchaser to clarify any easement / covenant granting access if the freehold property would otherwise be 'landlocked'.

 

Not fair to blame the OP for giving relevant details .... especially if this was prompted by trying to deflect from your erroneous statement of:

 

it is not a freehold garage, it is a leasehold garage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

As promised, an update on the freehold garage situation. We now have the contract from our solicitor and all's in order. We have a "right of way over the area coloured brown on the plan which has access to the garage". Everything else is in order. Thanks all for you input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...