Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Application Notice ??????????


Curt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have gone through the various stages of trying to claim my bank charges back, and I've gotten to the point of actually going to court.

 

I went to see a solicitor today, and he told me that the reason LloydsTSB were defending the case was because the particulars of my claim were too vague. I subsequently went to my local county court in order to obtain an 'application notice' to amend my claim.

 

I was wondering if anyone could help me out as to how to fill this sheet in?

 

As I originally actioned my claim on the 'moneyclaim' website I didn't initially fill out an N1 form, so I will have to totally rewrite the particulars of my claim.

 

This whole process is very nerve wracking. Now, being told that I need to amend my claim is the icing on the cake lol :-|

 

Has anyone else been in my position? Any help at all would be gratefully received :)

 

Cheers! Curt

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i'm in a similar boat as curt- the court allowed a set aside because the bank claim that they didnt know anyhting about it until after the default judgement was passed. also 'the details were vague' and the judge (who was very nice by the way) suggested i resubmit my claim, with full itemised charges, despite the fact that my lba had them all on. so, i am also facing resubmitting- don't worry though, its just a delay. however i will do it the old fashioned way and not online, and send copies of the bundle to the bank and their solicitors (its lloyds btw) so that everyting is in place. i didn't use the template suggested when i made the original claim, wish i had. duh.

 

am downloading as much legal bumpf as i can to add to the claim, any advice from experienced voices would be welcome, i'm sure by curt too.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot Michael, that's a real help! :D I'll copy my amended claim from the link you gave me there. All I need to do is to find out how to fill in the 'Application Notice' form.

 

SJMG, what did the judge say to you when he said you should amend your claim? Were you issued with one of these application notice forms?

 

 

 

In response to Michael's question, I have pasted my original particulars of claim below.

 

"I am claiming the return of money taken by

the defendant in the way of charges over

the last 6 years plus the interest plus the

interest they have levied on those charges.

The bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforcable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e).

In the event that the charges are not a

penalty then they are unreasonable within

the meaning of the Supply of Goods and

Services Act 1982 s.15.

I am claiming interest under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of

8% a year from 16/10/00 to 02/10/06 of

£158.12 and also interest at the same rate

up to the date of judgment."

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi curt,

 

the judge said that it was the fact that my mcol claim didn't contain the itemised charges, and that to avoid any lack of clarity that i should resubmit. he said the only issue relevent to the set aside was that a court should decide whether the charges are fair or not and to allow the bank to present their defence.

 

i'm not sure what the process is for resubmission, i'm going to call mcol tomorrow to ask them how i should proceed. my main issue at the moment is whether by resubmitting my claim i have to pay the fees again, and whether i am justified in adding that amount to the total of my claim. also, i did not claim for the interest, and am not sure if i can now or not.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Essentially these are fine. Fore-shortened maybe (due to MCOL limitations) but not vague, and Lloyds are defending because they do so as a matter of course. I personally would not bother going to the trouble, expense and delay of submitting an amendment, but you're perfectly free to follow you solicitor's advice.

 

if you do there are expanded POC's for N1 here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm not sure what the process is for resubmission, i'm going to call mcol tomorrow to ask them how i should proceed. my main issue at the moment is whether by resubmitting my claim i have to pay the fees again, and whether i am justified in adding that amount to the total of my claim. also, i did not claim for the interest, and am not sure if i can now or not.

 

 

Use N244 to amend your claim (£35 fee, unreclaimable), submit it with 3 N1 + 3 schedules. Court will return 2, one of which you serve/send to Lloyds and confirm to the court you have done so.

 

Download N244 here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/41901-form-n244-application-notice.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi michael,

 

thanks for that. stupid question(s)- but should the n1 contain the original claim or shall i fill out another, new claim as my mcol claim was lacking in specifics, and is it part of section c supporting evidence or should that be just itemised charges, lba and any legal documents relating to the case, and what are the schedules? is there a template available that you know of to fill in the n244 correctly for this type of claim?

 

also, is it too late at this point to add the interest charges?

 

sorry for all the qs i just want to get this bang on the nose this time, i made mistakes first time round that have dragged this out.

 

your help greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

N244

 

Top left hand box:

 

1. Tick c), without a hearing

 

Leave the rest blank

 

Part A

intend to apply for an order that:

amends my particulars of claim

 

because:

my particulars of claim did not state the statutory provisions on which my claim relies, nor did I submit a list of itemised charges

 

 

Part B:

 

tick 'evidance in part C' box

 

Part C:

 

Something like;

 

Please find attached to this application my proposed new particulars of claim, as well as an itemised schedule of charges for the amount claimed in respect of penalty charges levied by the defendant"

 

 

 

N1

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

 

1. The Claimant [has] [had] an account (XXXX Account No) with the Defendant which was opened on or around Date [and closed on or around date]

 

2. During the period in which the Account [has been] [was] operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

 

5. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

6. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £XXXX and any interest charged thereon;

 

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's brilliant advice Michael, thanks!

 

I've filled out my N244 form, and am now ready to complete my three N1 forms. I know what to write in the 'particulars of claim', however, there is also another box entitled 'brief details of claim'. I was wondering exactly what I should write in here? Is it just a shortened description of my 'particulars of claim'? :D

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of points, before filling out the N244 and sending off the fee, ask the defendant if they will agree to you amending your claim, i believe you can amend the claim by agreement which costs nothing.

 

As much as you may think it strange the defendant has nothing to loose from you amending your claim, if it comes to it you would have nothing to gain from agreeing to allow the defendant to alter their claim.

 

If either party refuses to agree all they would do is apply and pay the fee, so its worth a go.

 

Secondly if you have any defaults associated with these charges when you amend add them to your claim.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers everyone! Thanks for the advice :) I'm now getting everything filled out now.

 

I'm making my claim via the small claims track. This way I am lead to believe that I won't have to pay the defendant's court fees etc if I lose. Therefore, should I put on my N1 claim form that I am claiming my £120.00 court fee back if I am not prepared to pay their court fee if i lose? :|

 

Cheer! Curt :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curt

 

your particulars of claim should just include a line for costs.

 

Don't worry the court nor the other side will let you have anything your not entitled to.

 

With regards not being prepared to pay the other sides costs it doesn't work like that I'm afraid. If costs are awarded against you, you have to pay them.

 

However, in small claims court it is generally recognised that costs are not awarded unless someone has behaved unreasonably.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I can understand all that. But I was told that if it went through the small claims track that both parties just pay their own court costs and not each other's.

 

If I have to pay the defendant's court costs etc it might not actually be worth me going through with it in case I lose :shock: I don't think I'd be able to afford to pay their fees if I did lose.

 

Curt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curt

 

Michael is right if i confused you I'm sorry, i was only trying to point out that you don't put that you're not prepared to pay the defendants costs on the N1.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers lads, I understand where you're coming from now :rolleyes:

 

Don't apologise Glenn, I really appreciate the advice and you taking your time to help me. I really appreciate the help both of you have given me. Without your know how I wouldn't be able to do this properly.

 

Curt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Michael,

 

I've filled out my new N1 claim forms by copying what you wrote in your earlier post.

 

I was just wondering if you could tell me if this last part is correct and what it means. Tell me if I'm wrong, and I most probably am wrong, but does the following quote contradict itself?

 

"c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

Interest persuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx;"

 

Thanks a lot!

 

Curt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well spotted, that man!!

 

This is the hard copy N1 version:

 

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

 

And this is the MCOL version:

 

Interest persuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx

No idea why the difference or how I came to post both,

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW

 

you should realise though that the Court wont increase the interest beyond 8% even if they think you deserve it.

 

They can only reduce the amount of interest paid, so by only stating Sec69 in your POC you can only be awarded a max of 8% simple interest on your claim.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha, I'm eagle eyed I am mate!

 

I've actually got the paper versions of the N1 form which I collected from the court. Can I write down the MCOL version on these paper N1 claim forms? I've written both of them on my paper forms, but I'll just have to tipex the one out :D

 

Cheers, Curt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...