Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander default for overdraft


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2541 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I would love some advise..

 

I have a default registered by Santander on 19/05/12 for 4325 GBP

 

Long story but I emigrated to Australia in Jan 2013 and cannot remember if I told them!

I have checked on Experian and the default still shows Santander as the owner of the debt.

 

I had severe financial problems which was one of the reasons I emigrated.

I have dealt with all of my other creditors from here,

but I truly despise Santander because of the way they treated me in the mid 2000's

cutiing my overdraft limit in half with little notice.

I banked with them from 2001.

They closed my bank account in 2012.

 

I am in a position to return to the UK early 2018 and wanted to ask best tactic to deal with this debt, as I am aware they can CCJ me any time up to the 6 year default date ie May 2018.

The last thing I want to do is return to Blighty to a CCJ

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

 

Thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the debt will be sold or assigned to a Debt Collection Agency (DCA), so if you return it might not be Santander chasing you. The new debt owner would have the same rights to take you to court where you are resident.

 

If the owner of the debt does not obtain a CCJ within 6 years of the date you last paid or admitted to owing the debt in writing, then the debt would be subject to the limitation act (Statute barred). Means that if you defended any court claim as statute barred, then they should not gain a CCJ, so nothing to pay.

 

The debt will also come off your credit record on its 6th anniversary.

 

If i were in this situation, i would go through old records to see when i last paid towards this debt. I.e is it within the last 6 years. If i did not have the information i might contact Santander to get hold of statements and in doing do they will note you are resident in Australia. They would have no chance taking it to court in Australia. At least you then know what the score is in regard to statute barred or not.

 

Or you move back to the UK in 2018, keep an eye on your credit record in the meantime and by the time they trace you in the UK the debt should be statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your speedy reply Uncle!

 

 

There certainly have been no payments or communication with Santander since 19/05/12.

 

 

As I am unsure if I informed them of my plans to live in Australia, my biggest fear is them getting a CCJ without my knowledge on my last address in the UK. I do regularly check my uk credit file but if they obtain a ccj the first I would hear about it would potentially be on Experian and then it would be too late to defend..

 

 

Maybe I can write to them from Ozz 'without prejadice' informing them of my new address in Ozz?

 

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

no 2012+6=:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your speedy reply Uncle!

 

 

There certainly have been no payments or communication with Santander since 19/05/12.

 

 

As I am unsure if I informed them of my plans to live in Australia, my biggest fear is them getting a CCJ without my knowledge on my last address in the UK. I do regularly check my uk credit file but if they obtain a ccj the first I would hear about it would potentially be on Experian and then it would be too late to defend..

 

 

Maybe I can write to them from Ozz 'without prejadice' informing them of my new address in Ozz?

 

 

Cheers

 

You can also check trustonline for any CCJ against last known UK address. This is official registery for CCJ's and there is a small admin fee per search.

 

Yes you could write to Santander, just reminding them of your Aussie address for communications. You don't need to say anything in the letter or title it without predjudice. Just say that you are writing to remind them of your Aussie address for commuications, just in case previous correspondence was mislaid by them.

 

Re statute barred, this may be a number of months before the 6th anniversary of the default date. Banks don't default an overdrawn account normally until at least 3 months without payment. So as a total guess, i suspect the debt will be statute barred Jan or Feb 2018.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys sorry for the late reply...bit tricky with time differences here in Oz.!

 

Ok well the account was opened in Camden in 1997.

 

So are you saying write to Santander 'without prejadice'! I would really like to SAR them, and claim back fees. I used to have a 13k overdraft with them which they chopped in half, then halved again which caused me severe problems . If I do this would this start the 6 year process again?

 

Cheers....T

Link to post
Share on other sites

fees are long gone I would suspect but not forgotten if a court claim were to be started

but it would not be satans they'd sell it on

 

 

i'd be writing to Santander informing them, with proof

that you have been resident in OZ since year.

 

 

that way a backdoor ccj by debt buyers is prevented.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx!

 

Have checked my cf and the default is still showing with Santander.

Bit surprised they have not sold it on after all this time!

 

Ok will just send them a letter notifying them of my UK address and then wait and see....

 

Too easy....as they say over here!

 

Whoops correction.....notifying them of my oz address!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's better.

 

 

get some proof of posting that end

that's all you'll need should a claim ever be made whilst you can prove you were not legally resident in the UK.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers do, don't you sleep? Oh just looking at their address its a po box in Milton Keynes...I want to send recorded signed for. Should I send to the registered office in London?

 

Cheers T

Link to post
Share on other sites

head office that's not a POBOX.is well OK

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...