Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK PArking Enforcement Agency (Parkforce)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, thanks for the quick replies everyone, firstly no i havnt instigated contact with them, and secondly i am the registered owner of the vehicle. As for going to see the law prof, that may be an option, but i would rather not involve the university just yet, i plan to make an official complaint to the principle. So shall i write them a letter, explaining that i do in fact have photographic evidence showing that they are not lawfull in there sign placement and ergo i am not required to pay them~? or shall i just completley ignore them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are worrying completely unjustly mater. It's probably been linked before, but have a read of this link.

 

Judge says Excel parking fines illegal - Mansfield Chad

 

This is a sentence from it and should end any doubts you may have:

 

"But the far more important issue was that the judge found there was no justification for the £100 fine. He said it was a penalty charge and therefore unenforceable by the court.

 

Have a nice nights sleep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

Just reported this company ParkShield (aka. ParkForce, Private Car Parking Enforcement Agency, UK Parking Enforcement Agency) to the Trading Standards.

 

My company received TWO Parking Charge Notices in the post today;

No laughing but Both for the same registration, charged at the same date & time, different locations AND with wrong vehicle make & model list on both to what the vehicle is!

 

Plus the vehicle has never been to the place they state or our driver which is 280 miles away from the company.

 

It seems a couple of my employees got them to charging for parking in London during the day; Impossible they were working 90 miles away!

 

Well, I will not be paying either and would love them to take us to court to get the money! it would be just so much fun.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Well, I will not be paying either and would love them to take us to court to get the money! it would be just so much fun.:lol:

 

Unfortunately you wont get your day of fun in court, they don't go that far, just threaten it.

 

You could, of course, have some fun with them via Royal Mail though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

still havnt engaged in conversaion with them, but got letters through the other day from a differnt collection agency saying they were going to send debt collectors round my house unless i paid up, is this legal that is threatening with unjust cause, they cant do that anyway i havnt had any summon to court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish tactics from them. We ALL know that DCAs have no powers. if one turns up send him on his way. But video the whole thing !

 

who is this 'different agency' ? often its the same bunch of chancers using a different name.

 

whoever they are report them forthwith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but got letters through the other day from a differnt collection agency saying they were going to send debt collectors round my house unless i paid up

 

Just another tactic to scare you into paying. Of course, they are entitled to knock on your door, just as I am. They have no powers though - all they can do is ask for some money. You don't have to converse with them at all if you don't want to.

 

Chances of a knock on the door are very slim though. It's a waste of petrol for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is - so a good reason to keep the appointment with them !

ask for ID and then:

 

Question 1) to the DCA "have you come far"

Question 2) "Do you have far to go for your next appointment"

then "You have no powers, leave my property now. Drive safely."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all I am thinking about having a go at DVLA as I have just received a Parking Charge Notices to registered owner in the post on Saturday. Problem is that on the date the the original private parking charge was issued the car did not belong to me but to the previous owner. I am not worried about the unlawful charge I will just tell them to bog off. But I am annoyed that DVLA gave my details to these cretins when I did not own the vehicle at the time of the charge. You would think that when they are giving info out they would check that the info given is correct.

 

dpick:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that the way to go about this dpick would be to ask them why firstly so you can acertain if they received your registration.

 

If the answer is 'no' then you do exactly the same as they do and not accept that as an answer and issue them with an £80 penalty charge.

 

Still working by their rules, there is NO appeals process and demand that they pay or it will be refered to a debt collector and then court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've been writing to Parkforce over the last few months - the "ticket" was left on my car in November last year - and have started to receive letters and 'phone calls from Rossendales Collect.

 

Very rude, starting to get aggressive, stated that if I won't deal with it by 'phone they'll send someone around to my house. At what stage do I lodge a complaint under the "Protection From Harassment Act"?

 

Aus

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been writing to Parkforce over the last few months - the "ticket" was left on my car in November last year - and have started to receive letters and 'phone calls from Rossendales Collect.

 

Very rude, starting to get aggressive, stated that if I won't deal with it by 'phone they'll send someone around to my house. At what stage do I lodge a complaint under the "Protection From Harassment Act"?

 

Aus

While they may have been rude and agressive on the phone - I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. These are standard tactics for Debt Collectors. They're trying to intimidate you into paying.

 

The way to yank the chain for Rossendales is tell them the debt is disputed - refer back to their client as per OFT guidelines. Also tell them that you are withdrawing common law consent for anyone from Rossendales to come calling. If they still harass you after that then contact Trading Standards and tell them that you are being hassled for a disputed debt in breach of OFT guidelines and the Administration of Justice Act section 40.

 

If they actually bother sending anyone around make sure you record their visit, write down what was said, video them if you can - basically you'll need to gather evidence that they are harassing you. I'd call the police as soon as they identify themselves (You can make the Police aware of their threat now so that it's on record.) You'll need evidence of harassment to gain an injunction under the Protection from Harassment (which will cost you money).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't going to lose any sleep over it - but I got angry enough that I had to put the 'phone down before I said something I might regret...

 

Thanks for the quick reply - I'll bear your suggestions in mind for their next contact.

 

Aus

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Here's a bit of a twist on the whole Parkforce debacle that I hope somebody may be able to shed some light on or offer some guidance.

 

In a nut shell I was issues a parking ticket (and numerous since) from Park Force which I decided to investigate before paying. I found this forum and may a decision to ignore them and all of their correspondence.

I've had the letters then the letters with the big red writing and threats. They have been followed by letters from Rosendales collect threatening court action and I thought it won’t go to court because they know the contractual agreement blag won’t hold up etc etc.

 

One thing that is interesting is that within this time they have taken to sticking warnings on my car before issuing a ticket. In essence it's the same deal as the spiel they give on their contract boards but in a handy size that they can slap on your windscreen.

 

Now comes a letter from Else Commercial Solicitors. This is the 2nd that I've had, I don't know what the first said because it hit the bin before the door mat, but it reads as follows:

 

FINAL NOTICE

 

Dear sir/madam

 

Our client Park Force - UK Parking Enforcement Agency

(gives details of location)

Date of offence 13/13/2007 12:00:00

Car Registration Number: (gives correct details)

 

We refer to our letter dated 27 October 2008.

 

No Payment has been received and therefore, we confirm that Court proceedings are now being issued and will be served upon you. Please note that all costs of and incidental to issuing proceedings will be added to the sums set out in our earlier correspondence.

 

Should you wish to make payment, please send a cheque made payable to Else Commercial Solicitors to the address shown at the bottom of this letter for the total debt due in the sum of £200.80.

 

Alternatively... (and it goes on to say I can phone them and pay by credit or debit card but that they'll charge me 2% to use a credit card. It then gives details should I wish to pay by bank transfer)

 

Faithfully

 

Else Commercial Solicitors

 

Unlike Parkforce who's phone was answered by a toddler when I tried to contact them a while ago, these guys seem to be legitimate.

 

So it's not a threat of court proceedings but a letter to tell me that they are being issued... Is it time to get a solicitor on the case??

Edited by jonni2bad
Link removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them issue the court papers and have fun.

 

They have the same chance of winning a court case as ParkForce, providing that your defence is strong.

 

Remember that Rosendales threatened court proceedings and what happened? They passed it onto another company, presumably because they didn't have the balls to go through with their threats, knowing that they were on a loser. Do you think that a "more learned" bunch would take on a case that even Rosendales didn't think they could win?

MBNA - Agreed to refund £970 in full without conditions. Cheque received Sat 5th Aug.:D

Lloyds - Settled for an undisclosed sum.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

much easier to just ignore them for the vast majority of people. the PPC will have no idea who the driver was, if the RK or the driver is a policeman, a lawyer, works for Trading Standards etc. However if you are one of those types then the PPC taking you to court is not to be feared. Why do thing Perky has not picked up the gauntlet thrown down by pepipoo ? Of course a very small number of PPC invoices may be enforceable so that always has to factored in - but it is a very small number and have never seen a PPC yet that didn't act unlawfully in trying to enforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well we too have received a letter from "The UK Parking Enforcement Agency" with many a threat etc etc. After reading through the whole post my suspicions were correct that they are a bunch of unlawful con artists praying on the weak. Its also interesting to see that after a year or so no court action came to any of the earlier posters. By the way i would love to hear of the outcome for Bella 47 & Phantom in particular. So i would like to say a big thank you for all the information and help supplied. Think i will send off one of the template letters tomorow with my parcels that i have to post and see what the reply is.

 

By the way i have no intention of ever paying up as we parked there to use the store in the 1st place! Cant say i will ever use the store again though after the reply i got from the manager!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im seething on Dec 15th 2008 I attended the Royal free hospital nw3, for an appointment to see the vascular team to discuss the best op to save my legs and hopefully enable me to walk, also had a pre assessment.

 

The disabled parking in the AE entrance was TOTALLY blocked off with a builders fence. We were TOLD by an attendant there that we see most visits, to park in a corner where he pointed to. So I did and displayed my blue badge.

 

We left the hospital about 2 hrs later.

 

Then 0n 26/1/09 I get a threatening letter from this bunch of clowns dated 22/1/09 demanding £85 within 7 days or it goes up to £135, they say its £85 not £60 as I ignored the first letter, I HAVENT HAD A LETTER BEFORE THE ONE DATED 22/1/09 AND DID NOT EVEN HAVE A BLOODY PARKING TICKET ON THE CAR!

 

Is this a deliberate ploy to not put a ticket on cars at the Royal Free so the fine goes up? Has anyone else had this happen at the Royal Free ? because I think the attendent that said we could park should face the sack, no be sacked! Bloody under handed useless shower of *!#!*

 

I have wriiren an appeal still waiting to hear....

 

Chris GRRRRR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have wriiren an appeal still waiting to hear....

 

Chris GRRRRR

 

To save you waiting for their reply I'll summarise it for you; "Your appeal is rejected, please pay us megabucks immediately or it will increase by a zillion pounds."

 

Best just to ignore everything that comes from them from now on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am of the school who believes NEVER contact the PPC. if you do then do not use a home made letter rather use on of the standard ones from here. Do NOT post what you have written (to them or on here :) . just let them waste their money writing their 'scary' letters. have a look at the stickies here. and relax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...