Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

XS Direct 3k Total Excess - Worried regarding Debt Collectors


Jayden1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes you need to escalate the FOS complaint. I don't think xs direct will wait around 6 months before debt collection activity starts, if you are not continuing with the FOS complaint.

 

At the end of the FOS process, if they don't fully uphold your complaint and you have to pay xs direct, then it is up to you how you deal with it.

 

I would suggest you offer long term repayment over say 3 years or however long you need.

 

If xs direct ever go to court all you would be expected to make are affordable repayments.

 

Any offers you make in advance would see you in a good light.

 

But you are not at this stage yet.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Stupid question, but how did Hyperperformance explain the All Sections excess? Did they just tell you it applies to all sections or did they tell you that it is paid if you claim or did they properly explain how it works?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you need to escalate the FOS complaint. I don't think xs direct will wait around 6 months before debt collection activity starts, if you are not continuing with the FOS complaint.

 

At the end of the FOS process, if they don't fully uphold your complaint and you have to pay xs direct, then it is up to you how you deal with it. I would suggest you offer long term repayment over say 3 years or however long you need. If xs direct ever go to court all you would be expected to make are affordable repayments. Any offers you make in advance would see you in a good light. But you are not at this stage yet.

 

Can I not just keep telling them I am escalating this to my FOS investigator and give them her name and my reference number just to keep prolonging it and buy myself some time?

 

Stupid question, but how did Hyperperformance explain the All Sections excess? Did they just tell you it applies to all sections or did they tell you that it is paid if you claim or did they properly explain how it works?

 

Quite simply put, The sales representative over the phone when I first purchased the policy told me "it is an all sections excess meaning even in the event of a third party claim I could be asked for the full amount from XS Direct".

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is up to you. But you will have the FOS and xs direct writing to you asking what you are up to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pass.

 

Suspect FOS might just decide your complaint is closed and then xs direct will employ debt collectors.

 

Within 6 months, if there was no final decision on the complaint you could re-open submitting any further submissions to the FOS and debt collection would then be on hold.

 

Personally,

i think you should respond to what xs direct have said and go for a final decision from the actual ombudsman.

 

If your complaint is not upheld, then negotiate repayment over as long a period as you need.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, Well as always I'll keep you updated on my movements and the help is much appreciated.

 

Its a shame it seems like its come to this "repayment" option as I really thought I had a fighting chance. Feels as if XS Direct have ignored my complaint and focused on the part they can easily bat back to me and reject as their final response. I will outline what we discussed above to my FOS Investigator within a week or 2 and make sure she understands where I am coming from.

 

Lesson has definitely been learnt in which I can tell anyone else I meet out there, Friends or family who don't have the guidance and complete inexperience in the car insurance side of the world to not make the same mistake I did just to get themselves on the road.

 

Kind Regards

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all

 

Just an update to anyone out there. After XS Direct issued their final response I did not forward it to an Ombudsman as of yet and left me alone for a couple months. I am now with different insurers and did not have mine cancelled with them due to disputing my case at the time.

 

They are however chasing me for the sum now and threatening to pass the debt to debt collectors if they do not hear from me by the 26th of this month. I'm worried and unsure as to what to do at this point as I do not have the means to pay that sort of money.

 

Shall I forward my previous dispute from a few months ago to an ombudsman ?

 

Will they actually get debt collectors involved to chase down payment and take legal action?

 

Any advice/ info would be appreciated again

 

Thank you, Hope you are all well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read back through the thread. You knew you would get to this point, where you would have the debt chased and you can just ask the FOS to elevate the complaint to an Ombudsman. From memory they are purely replying on you being informed of the excess when you bought the policy. Read through your complaint to the Ombudsman, as you gave a good explanation of other issues e.g threatened cancellation, no terms stated in policy about repayment of the excess.

 

Once you continue the FOS complaint, they should back off and let the FOS come to a decision. If your complaint is not upheld, then negotiate repayment over a long period.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt collectors have no powers.

 

XS direct would have to issue a county court claim first and if you ended up with a CCJ, you could be subject to enforcement.

 

But you would not let it get that far and would apply to pay by instalments based on what you could afford.

 

If you lose your FOS complaint, then offer £20 a month to XS direct as an amount you can afford.

 

Then it us up to them.

 

If they reject your offer, it is up to them whether they take you to court and still end up with £20 a month.

 

Seems a bit pointless, apart from getting the debt officially registered.

 

They might not bother.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright. Once again thank you for clearing things up and clearing my head up at the same time.

 

One question though, When you say "they might not bother" meaning they might just write it off entirely or you mean settle with £20 a month?

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not every debt is subject to a court claim.

 

Companies will make a decision as to whether it is worth it or not.

 

They will hassle you with debt collection letters and phone calls first.

 

Insurance companies don't generally have staff that deal with long term debt payments of £20 a month.

 

If they accept it, then mostly likely to be farmed out to a debt collection agency ( DCA) to do the admin.

 

You will the get hassled every 6 months to increase the amount.

 

If you can't afford an increase, you just tell them and ignore.

 

A DCA is more likely to go to court than an Insurance company.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me, i would not want to play games. You are doing what you did before. Not escalating your complaint to buy yourself a few months of peace and then worrying 2 months later when you are threatened with debt collection. Seems like a head in sand opportunity is taken whenever this is an option.

 

Suggest you escalate your FOS complaint NOW and that should put debt collection on hold for a few months. If your complaint is not upheld, then offer XS direct the £20 a month. If you start paying, it will be end of year or start of next. As i say, it will be difficult for them in regard to £20 a month, but given no repayment terms offered in policy terms, then they don't have much legal argument to require anything more.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just had a thought when looking at threads.

 

If the FOS reject your complaint and don't make any mention of how the £3k is to be repaid, just saying that is between parties to negotiate. If XS Direct reject your offer of £20 a month, then why not start a new FOS complaint, on the specifics of the £20 a month offer being rejected. In theory it would be a new complaint issue. The FOS might say it is a continuation of previous complaint, but if they don't deal with repayment terms, then why should they not look at it. The FOS should be looking out for consumer interests.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

hello just gone through your post

even i got same problem from xs direct asking me to pay £1485 and insurance was mis sold to me

 

never explained about excess properly and

 

when i ask them can i pay £50 a month they refused and told me you can only pay 10 month £148 a month and they told me if they dont receive first payment by 1 dec 2017 they will send it to debt collection

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow really, That's horrible news...

 

From what I've been told above they do not have a choice if you say to them £50 is all you can afford... I'm not sure how they could send it off for debt collection if you're offering some form of payment etc but I'd wait until one of the others reply... That's not encouraging for me at all as I'm still awaiting a reply from my Ombudsman.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello just gone through your post even i got same problem from xs direct asking me to pay £1485 and insurance was mis sold to me never explained about excess properly and when i ask them can i pay £50 a month they refused and told me you can only pay 10 month £148 a month and they told me if they dont recieve first payment by 1 dec 2017 they will send it to debt collection

 

Sent to Debt Collection means absolutely nothing.

 

They can move your debt paperwork down to the local fish chip shop to wrap cod and chips in and they would have about the same level of authority.

 

Debt collectors do not have any powers.

 

They simply try to come to payment arrangement with you and if you don't then it is up to xs direct what they want to do.

 

If you are happy you owe a debt for the amount stated, it is your choice whether you want to pay them.

If you do, then there is no requirement to agree with any repayment schedule.

If you can only afford £10 a month, that is all you have to pay, no more.

The xs direct policy had no repayment terms in their policy contract, so the repayment amount is your choice.

 

If you refused to pay a debt at all,

then it would be up to xs direcf to issue a court claim against you and if you got a CCJ,

you just apply to pay affordable regular payments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

would be nice if the OP updated us as to what transpired...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I would give an update if I had an update myself...

 

I have given my FOS Investigator my complaint towards XS Direct themselves and clarified/ changed some of the initial wording and emphasized certain points even more within the new word document I sent her.

 

She replied asking if I had a final response letter from XS Direct,

Which I did receive but couldn't locate to send her so I told her no.

 

I have not heard back from her in a couple weeks now so I will send her another follow up email.

 

I haven't heard back from XS Direct neither after they told me a month or so ago that my case would be put on hold after I informed them I was pursuing my complaint with my FOS Investigator.

 

If any updates arise I will be posting them here immediately. Hope you are all well anyways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...