Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In short you never communicate with a Debt Collector, they have no power here at all. The snotty letter is only used to respond to a properly worded Letter Before Claim. The only time you would be recommended to contact the PPC is to send the snotty letter. You do nothing but keep the tripe they send you unless you receive a letter before claim.
    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Talk Talk cancelled my account and now pursuing me for breach of contract - help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi - I'm looking for advice on a long-running dispute with Talk Talk.

 

In December 2014 I opened a Talk Talk account but went overseas before it became live (due 29 December). I came back home a few weeks later later in january 2015 expecting the account to be live but found letters saying "we're sorry you decided to leave us".

 

I called up and was told the account was now cancelled (as of 17 or 18 of January). Talk Talk are now pursuing me for £240 odd pounds for breach of contract. They have provided no evidence that I did indeed breach the contract but claim another provider took over the line.

 

I had no communications with any other provider, and also received no introductory information or correspondence from any other provider. I had a telephone conversations with Talk Talk a few days before the account was cancelled - asking what my new phone number would be - and they didn't mention the account was about to close.

 

I did take the case to the ombudsman who found that Talk Talk had followed their own procedures for notifying me of cancellation of the account (several letters) and said they only ruled on whether they followed procedure. Talk Talk have refused to show me what the request to terminate the contract looked like, citing data protection. I am now putting in a request for them to provide transcripts of all of our communincations and all information about my account.

 

Talk Talk are claiming they wouldn't have transferred the account without an instruction from me, but that's clearly wrong since I didn't provide one. There must have been a mistake somewhere but they are refusing to acknowledge it. Talk Talk have now referred the case to Lowell Group to pursue the charges.

 

I have requested all data about my account including telephone transcripts but haven't had the response yet. I think I am now at the point where I need to actively seek to raise a case against Talk Talk. legal advice since Talk Talk refuse to drop the case despite having no evidence that I breached the contract. So my questions are: - has anyone else experienced this and how did you deal with it? - can anyone recommend how I would go about getting specialist contract law / telecomms legal advice that was economical? - what woudl be the best route to go down? Small claims is attractive, but frankly this has cost me quite a bit so maybe I should go another route? Is there an icon for tearing my hair out?!!!

I'm grateful for any advice - this has been going on for over 2 years and I'm desperate to resolve it. Lorna

Edited by silverfox1961
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

In my opinion, legal action is still a long way off. I assume you have sent a Subject Access Request (SAR) to TT to get all the account info, data and history and sent them £10 to cover the costs of this request.

 

What usually happens is that a company will make an error with an account and accidentally cancel the wrong account. The SAR may show this event and if you can prove you were elsewhere at the time of the cancellation, this would put TT in an awkward spot. Why TT are spouting the data Protection Act when it is your data is a little concerning. Are they trying to hide something?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. I have submitted a subject access request but haven't had a response yet - I only get post once week in my current location so things can take a very long time to get to me. Meanwhile Lowell Group continue to say they are raising a case against me which is pretty stressful. I was beyond furious when they cited data protection as a reason not to tell me who had taken over my account or who had instructed a change. I was the only resident and it was an account in my name. But they wouldn't tell me anything and have never produced any information. Hopefully the SAR will throw something up. I was definitely in Pakistan at the time the account was cancelled as I was working there at the time but I have told them that and it made no difference. It would be good to resolve without legal action so lets hope the Subject Access Request sheds some light on what happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a practice where telephone services are taken over by competing providers and it tends to be a very haphazard sloppy arrangement where it seems that it can happen without even the customer knowing about it. I know because I've been on the end of it happening with British Telecom.

 

I certainly agree that the first thing to do is to send off an SAR, and you seem to have done this. Not a lot you can do until you receive the results.

 

When you receive the disclosure then you will need to go through it very carefully not only to find out what is there – but also to try and figure out what is not there.

 

I'm very interested to learn that they have responded to you refusing to give you certain information which applies to you on the basis that it is subject to the Data Protection Act.

 

I'd be very grateful if you could post up a copy of that letter in PDF format – redact the identifiers of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:frusty:

 

No tearing hair out image.. perhaps hitting head against brick wall will do !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...