Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This must be part of the new tactic from Evri.  They know they are going to lose. They take it to the wire and then don't bother to turn up in order to save themselves costs and of course they don't give a damn about the cost to the British taxpayer and the extra court delays they cause. This is a nasty dishonest company – but rather in line with all of the parcel delivery industry which knows that their insurance requirements are unlawful. They know that their prohibited items are for the most part unfair terms. They know for the most part that a "safe place" is exactly what it means – are not left on somebody's doorstep in full view. They know that obtaining a signature means that they have to show the signature not simply claim that they received a signature. They are making huge profits especially from their unlawful and unenforceable insurance requirement. Although this is less valuable than the PPI scandal, in terms of the number of people who are affected nationwide, PPI pales into insignificance. I hope the paralegals working for Evri are proud of themselves and they tell their families what they have done during the day when they go home.
    • Your PCN does not comply with the Protection of freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9[2][a] (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The only time on the PCN is 17.14. That is only  a time for there to be a period there would have to be a start and and end time mentioned. of course they do show the ANPR arrival and departures  times but that is not the parking period and their times are on the photographs not on the PCN. They also failed to comply with S.9[2][f] as they omitted to say that they could only pursue the keeper if they complied with the Act. That means that they can only pursue the driver as the keeper cannot be held liable for the charge. As they do not know who was driving and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person they will struggle to win. Especially as so many people are able to legally drive your car and you haven't appealed giving them no indication therefore of who was driving. Small nitpicking point-the date of Infringement was 22/04/2024. They appear to be saying that they can charge an extra amount [up to £70 ] if they have to use a debt collector. You do not have a contract with a debt collector so they cannot add that cost. You paid for four hours so it can only be the 15 minutes they are complaining about. You are entitled to a ten minute minimum grace period at the end of the parking period which would be easier to explain if the car park had been bigger. However if you allow for two minutes to park and two minutes to leave that gives you one minute to account for. Things like being held on the way out by cars in front waiting to get on to Northgate or even your own car being held up trying to get on to Northgate at a busy time. then other considerations like having to stop to allow pedestrians to walk in front of you or being held up by another car doing a u turn in front of your car. you would have to check with the driver and see if they could account for an extra one minute things like a disabled passenger or having to strap in a child . I am not advocating lying since that could lead to serious problems [like jail time] but there can be an awful lot of minor things that can cause a hold up of a minute even the engine not starting straight away or another car being badly parked as examples. Sadly you cannot include the 5 minute Consideration period as both IPC and BPA fail to comply with the convention that you can include that time with the Grace period.  
    • Defence struck out not case struck out...you have judgment  Well done topic title updated Regard's Please consider making a donation if not already to support us to help others.   Andy.   .
    • Hi all, I wanted to update you and thank you all for your help. I am delighted announce that after the case was struck out due to no response from Evri, judgement was issued after I submitted the forms and I was just about to take it to warrant.  today I received an email from the claims department requesting my bank details to make payment for my full award. The process has been long since the initial proceedings  in January i must say your help and guidance has been greatly appreciated.  
    • Quote of the century "Farage pops up when the country’s at a low ebb; like a kind of political herpes" - Frankie Boyle Updates
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GEmoney mortgage now engage & 2 GE secured loans sold to arrows - repo threatened - help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We had our mortgage and 2 secured loans with ge money.

 

out of the blue about 6 months ago get a letter stating they had sold our mortgage on to engage credit, had no prior warning of this happening.

 

3 months ago get another letter telling us our 2 secured loans had been sold on to arrow global.

Now when the loans were with ge money was paying £225 a month and believed this to be covering both the loans. Never received a letter at any point stating we was behind with 1 of them,

 

 

now arrow global are telling us that the £225 we were paying was only being paid on 1 of them, and the one that wasn't being paid only has 11 months left to run and only way to stop eviction process is to pay £980 a month for the rest of the term, which we can not afford, they are not prepared to stop the process for re-posession.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated,thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

will need a break down of how much is outstanding on the mortgage, the 2 loans and how long each have to run.

Also, do you have any insurance or PPI tied in as a condition of any of these?

 

if you were paying £225 a month for 3 loans and one of them is for £10k then you obviously havent benn paying enough but that doesnt give them the right to force a sale.

 

They try this in an attempt to add fees and their alleged costs to bump up a profit for them.

 

What paperwork did they send regarding setting up a DD or standing order for paying the now divided payments?

 

When was your last full statement from GE money?

did you get one when they bailed out

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be helpful to others if you could provide a proper breakdown and history of each agreement...amounts borrowed/dates/ and what you should be paying and were actually paying etc.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

£980, presumably £225 repayment x2, and £530 to make up arrears

 

£530 x 11 : £5830.

Leaving aside interest, that still represents over 25 "monthly payments of £225" missed..... when were the secured loans taken out? About 2 years ago? If not then, was there any other change about 2 years ago??

 

I'm no expert in this field, but it looks to me that either arrow's calculations are wrong, or the issue predates their involvement.

 

Check your credit file : when was there first a marker for a missing payment? What date is on any default notice, and when was it sent?

 

Check your agreement with GE: how much were you supposed to be paying?

 

SAR both GE and Arrow.

 

A lender (Arrow included) is obliged to treat you fairly.

If you weren't aware of arrears, and they are demanding them within a short term, after they have been allowed to accumulate over years (without them informing you) : that isn't fair.

 

If (according to the original agreement) you were supposed to be paying £450 a month - they can reasonably expect this per month.

If so, I'd push for paying that as part of an agreement : to pay off the secured loan that had been being paid within the 11 months, and prevent any increase (other than interest on arrears) in the sum owed for the 2nd secured loan, by paying £450 / month for 11 months.

 

You push for this on grounds of being treated fairly: for not being advised of the lender's error earlier.

 

Once the first secured loan is paid off, you continue to pay the £450, to clear the outstanding 5830 on the 2nd secured loan, which should then take about 13 months.

 

Sure you end up paying £450/ month for 13 months longer than you originally signed up to : but they will point out that equally you underpaid £225 a month for 24 or 25 months ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK bit more detail sorry

 

one was for £6000

and the other £7000

 

should of been approximately £105 and £115 for the 2 loans.

 

Which is why I assumed the £225 was covering both and heard nothing different to say otherwise from ge money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not enough information, we need to know when the mortgage and loans were taken out, how much for, what the original term was, what the current balance is and when they are due to be paid off.

Look at Bazza's workings and see if this is applicable to you. You will need to SAR the firms involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK bit more detail sorry one was for £6000 and the other £7000 should of been approximately £105 and £115 for the 2 loans. Which is why I assumed the £225 was covering both and heard nothing different to say otherwise from ge money.

 

 

If so, then one should be overpaid, one underpaid!.

You can keep giving us info in dribs and drabs, or tell us the whole story : it depends if you want accurate advice or not!.

 

Still not enough information, we need to know when the mortgage and loans were taken out, how much for, what the original term was, what the current balance is and when they are due to be paid off.

Look at Bazza's workings and see if this is applicable to you. You will need to SAR the firms involved

 

I now doubt my workings are applicable. They weren't unreasonable based on what the OP has posted, but they've posted more since then. As you've correctly said, we need more info from the OP to disentangle what has happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if GE money sold loan to Arrows

its duff.

 

sar time to GE money ASAP.

 

Arrows cant go for repo if they are not named on land registry

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason it's a bit muddled is that for 18 months I was fighting a esa appeal which had caused some of the loans to get behind.

 

can you elaborate on why arrow can't do this

 

.the figure of £225 is what they said we needed to pay for them to not do anything further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get the sar running?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go up on the land registry site and see whos name is against the mortgage deeds and the 2 secured loans against the property

 

 

how was this threat of repo made

I hope you've not been talking on the phone??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

" now arrow global are telling us that the £225 we were paying was only being paid on 1 of them, and the one that wasn't being paid only has 11 months left to run and only way to stop eviction process is to pay £980 a month for the rest of the term, which we can not afford, they are not prepared to stop the process for re-posession. "

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated,thank you.

 

By letter DX

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go up on the land registry site and see whos name is against the mortgage deeds and the 2 secured loans against the property

 

 

 

 

how was this threat of repo made

I hope you've not been talking on the phone??

 

 

They did constantly ring,where do I go to look at the land registry?? And do I have to pay to view it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they can threaten repo then

 

Can we see the letter please

Scan to PDF and upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever requested a copy of the agreement s from Arrow since assignment ?

 

Did you receive Notice of Assignments for the debts ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask for copies of the agreements then now as they are threatening this that and the other.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...