Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

euro parking/gladstones claimform - PCN maghull centre merseyside **DISCONTINUED ++ COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

??nothing to do with the form that's only for ref...

 

 

fill this out please

and copy n paste it back here answering the questions

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***(2-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi...

claimant is euro parking services ltd..

 

..issue date 21/02/17.

 

..particulars of the claim

1.the driver of the vehicle (reg) incurred the parking charge on 20/10/16 for breaching the terms of parking on the land at maghull centre

 

2.the defendant was driving the vehicle and /or is the keeper of the vehicle

3.and the claimant claims £160 for parking charges/damages and indemnity costs if applicable,

together with interest of £3.33 pursuant to s69 of the county courts act 1984 at 8% pa,

continuing to judgement at £0.04 per day

 

..sorry couldn't get my head round the copy and paste thats required

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

 

is that ALL the particulars of claim state [bar pers info?]

 

so your defence is due by day 33 from the date on the claimform where by that date is one in the count

you do NOT miss it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi..

thought i had followed everything right so far as you have told me.

 

..do i need to put in a defence and counterclaim.

 

.i have a form here to do it and do i send that to gladstones solicitors.

 

.i have also found a letter from gladstones i thought i had lost dated 02/02/17..

 

."LETTER BEFORE CLAIM"

Link to post
Share on other sites

the claim is cobblers,

they have to prove who the driver was,

they cant just put "the defendant is.was/maybe someone who may have been present at the time or maybe not"

 

Also the amount is nonsense,

if the contract offered by the sign says £100 then £100 it is, not soem made up amount.

 

The reason they do this si because most people either pay up when they get the claim or ignore it and lose by deafault.

 

Only 15% of the 200,000 claims in the county court are defended

so once you join that minority the parking cowboys start to brick it because they are then into a losing situation and have paid some snake oil mercahnt good money to issue a claim and they will get nothing but grief for their money.

 

OK, you need to acknowledge the service of the claim and

 

for a defence I would put something like

 

"the defendant denies that any contract was formed between the palintiff and himself.

It is put to srtict proof that such a contract exists as there is no keeper liability under the POFA in this matter.

 

The Particulars of Claim contain no detail as to the nature of such a breach of a contract,

the amount claimed does not reflect any contractual obligation and the general vagueness of the claim means that it is not possible to submit a proper defence It is therefore requested that the claim be struck out under CPR 16.4"

 

You do not counterclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi and thank you once again..

.i have been on here in the past and was told to ignore everything.

.you even told me to send the paperwork to yourselves and you will ignore it for me but that was many years ago.

 

 

. i have successfully appealed in the past when i got a parking ticket at Aintree hospital because i couldn't get a disabled parking place for my father who had emphyzema and couldn't walk very far and had to leave the car near the entrance and was told by security that they would make sure i didn't get a ticket but i did..

.Had to appeal to solicitors in southampton..

 

so from what you have told me i just need to wait now for a reply off the solicitors..is that right..

i don't need to do anything else?..

 

 

when you say i have to acknowledge the service of the claim,

how to i do that?.

..we will be making a donation to CAG once i get all this sorted

 

 

...do you think i will end up in court having to defend this because i am well up for it now .

..i have had a belly full of these companies

best regards

steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

until the Beavis decision all of the parking co's had to show a schedule of loss,

the same way as a landowner suing you for trespass would

- ie they claim DAMAGES and you haven't damaged their car park so nothing due.

 

 

The Beavis decision placed these parking contracts in the same basket as business to business contracts

whereby you could be sued for a penalty sum for damages, even if no loss was actually made.

 

 

The idea of this is not to be punitive but a "commercial consideration" and £80 was deemed OK.

Most parking co's have crept that up to £100 since Beavis, typical greedy act of a disreputable industry

Link to post
Share on other sites

leave the paper claimform alone

all you need that is for ref

do it all online

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats that about it in post 32 for then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok then

 

 

post29 then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo::yo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

they arent going to respond so tomorrow you write to the court ( or the bulk centre if a court hasnt been allocated yet)

and request that the claim be struck out under CPR 16.4 as ECP havent shown a cause for action based upon the CPR 31.14 request

- no locus standi and have failed to show proof of who the driver was at the time asd there is no keeper liability in this matter.

 

You probably wont get the strike out but you may well get a demand for your defence evidence for a case management hearing to determine whether they can carry on. At worst, the first thing the judge will ask them is why they have made this claim if they have no proof of contract with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are writing to the court so your details and the claim number, normally written as: ECP v defendant, claim ref 12xy23456. then say

 

I wish to request that the claim against me is struck out under CPR 16.4 as ECP have failed to show a cause for action against the defendant by failing to supply enough detail as to what the claim is for in the Particulars of Claim and by failing to respond for evidence of their locus standi and reasons for the claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request.

 

 

It is not possible to defend a claim that doesnt say whether it is brought as a breach of contract or monies owed under a contract or whether they have identified the defendant as the driver at the time as they havent said they are relying on keeper liability under the POFA 2012 to create a liability by the defendant.

 

you dont send this the ECP or Gladstones, just the court. you may well not get a reply, the court may well tell Gladdys to show a reason for claiming or lose the claim without a hearing or it may get filed until acourt and judge are allocated..

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence was due FRIDAY!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to fax do it on MCOL.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...