Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

euro parking/gladstones claimform - PCN maghull centre merseyside **DISCONTINUED ++ COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

??nothing to do with the form that's only for ref...

 

 

fill this out please

and copy n paste it back here answering the questions

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***(2-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi...

claimant is euro parking services ltd..

 

..issue date 21/02/17.

 

..particulars of the claim

1.the driver of the vehicle (reg) incurred the parking charge on 20/10/16 for breaching the terms of parking on the land at maghull centre

 

2.the defendant was driving the vehicle and /or is the keeper of the vehicle

3.and the claimant claims £160 for parking charges/damages and indemnity costs if applicable,

together with interest of £3.33 pursuant to s69 of the county courts act 1984 at 8% pa,

continuing to judgement at £0.04 per day

 

..sorry couldn't get my head round the copy and paste thats required

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

 

is that ALL the particulars of claim state [bar pers info?]

 

so your defence is due by day 33 from the date on the claimform where by that date is one in the count

you do NOT miss it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi..

thought i had followed everything right so far as you have told me.

 

..do i need to put in a defence and counterclaim.

 

.i have a form here to do it and do i send that to gladstones solicitors.

 

.i have also found a letter from gladstones i thought i had lost dated 02/02/17..

 

."LETTER BEFORE CLAIM"

Link to post
Share on other sites

the claim is cobblers,

they have to prove who the driver was,

they cant just put "the defendant is.was/maybe someone who may have been present at the time or maybe not"

 

Also the amount is nonsense,

if the contract offered by the sign says £100 then £100 it is, not soem made up amount.

 

The reason they do this si because most people either pay up when they get the claim or ignore it and lose by deafault.

 

Only 15% of the 200,000 claims in the county court are defended

so once you join that minority the parking cowboys start to brick it because they are then into a losing situation and have paid some snake oil mercahnt good money to issue a claim and they will get nothing but grief for their money.

 

OK, you need to acknowledge the service of the claim and

 

for a defence I would put something like

 

"the defendant denies that any contract was formed between the palintiff and himself.

It is put to srtict proof that such a contract exists as there is no keeper liability under the POFA in this matter.

 

The Particulars of Claim contain no detail as to the nature of such a breach of a contract,

the amount claimed does not reflect any contractual obligation and the general vagueness of the claim means that it is not possible to submit a proper defence It is therefore requested that the claim be struck out under CPR 16.4"

 

You do not counterclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi and thank you once again..

.i have been on here in the past and was told to ignore everything.

.you even told me to send the paperwork to yourselves and you will ignore it for me but that was many years ago.

 

 

. i have successfully appealed in the past when i got a parking ticket at Aintree hospital because i couldn't get a disabled parking place for my father who had emphyzema and couldn't walk very far and had to leave the car near the entrance and was told by security that they would make sure i didn't get a ticket but i did..

.Had to appeal to solicitors in southampton..

 

so from what you have told me i just need to wait now for a reply off the solicitors..is that right..

i don't need to do anything else?..

 

 

when you say i have to acknowledge the service of the claim,

how to i do that?.

..we will be making a donation to CAG once i get all this sorted

 

 

...do you think i will end up in court having to defend this because i am well up for it now .

..i have had a belly full of these companies

best regards

steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

until the Beavis decision all of the parking co's had to show a schedule of loss,

the same way as a landowner suing you for trespass would

- ie they claim DAMAGES and you haven't damaged their car park so nothing due.

 

 

The Beavis decision placed these parking contracts in the same basket as business to business contracts

whereby you could be sued for a penalty sum for damages, even if no loss was actually made.

 

 

The idea of this is not to be punitive but a "commercial consideration" and £80 was deemed OK.

Most parking co's have crept that up to £100 since Beavis, typical greedy act of a disreputable industry

Link to post
Share on other sites

leave the paper claimform alone

all you need that is for ref

do it all online

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats that about it in post 32 for then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok then

 

 

post29 then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo::yo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

they arent going to respond so tomorrow you write to the court ( or the bulk centre if a court hasnt been allocated yet)

and request that the claim be struck out under CPR 16.4 as ECP havent shown a cause for action based upon the CPR 31.14 request

- no locus standi and have failed to show proof of who the driver was at the time asd there is no keeper liability in this matter.

 

You probably wont get the strike out but you may well get a demand for your defence evidence for a case management hearing to determine whether they can carry on. At worst, the first thing the judge will ask them is why they have made this claim if they have no proof of contract with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are writing to the court so your details and the claim number, normally written as: ECP v defendant, claim ref 12xy23456. then say

 

I wish to request that the claim against me is struck out under CPR 16.4 as ECP have failed to show a cause for action against the defendant by failing to supply enough detail as to what the claim is for in the Particulars of Claim and by failing to respond for evidence of their locus standi and reasons for the claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request.

 

 

It is not possible to defend a claim that doesnt say whether it is brought as a breach of contract or monies owed under a contract or whether they have identified the defendant as the driver at the time as they havent said they are relying on keeper liability under the POFA 2012 to create a liability by the defendant.

 

you dont send this the ECP or Gladstones, just the court. you may well not get a reply, the court may well tell Gladdys to show a reason for claiming or lose the claim without a hearing or it may get filed until acourt and judge are allocated..

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence was due FRIDAY!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to fax do it on MCOL.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...