Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax benefit help please


GordonBenefit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will try to be as brief as possible. I am self employed. I own my home outright. Due to a variety of illnesses and disabilities and the ecenomic times we are in I have been struggling of late and decided to apply for council tax benefit as my income is well below the required threshold and I have next to no savings anymore having tried in vein to just pay the council tax anyway and am currently up to date.

 

I had no idea how difficult and frankly discouraging the local authority could be. They are asking me for audited accounts. I do not have audtied accounts, it is just me as a very small time sole trader. If I could afford audited accounting, I would not need help with council tax!

 

But today I received a letter telling me that 'an officer needs to see you at the property...'. meaning my home. I am not a council tenant and am not at all happy to have a council employee in my home at all. I have provided proof of me, my address, utitility bills, bank statements, they know I live here because they send me the council tax bill!!!!

 

Can anyone point me in the right direction please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is routine. I mean, I realise it's not great - who wants council folks showing up and asking to see paperwork? But it is one of the things you occasionally have to tolerate when you claim benefits.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both. That is appreciated. I have multiple medical conditions including autism and phyiscal diabilities. If they simply want to see where I live I suppose that is understandable.

 

Now, when I said they seem to make things difficult I was not joking. I pay for my Council tax by direct debit. I have paid every month on time without exception, including this month (leaving December, January, February and March to pay. Yet, 3 days after submitting my claim they send me an ammended bill in which they demand the rest of the years money in two payments, effectively doubling what I just told them I could not afford. So December 1st will be more than double what I would have paid if I had not made a claim!!!!!

 

Is this actually designed to cause alarm and distress? Before applying I was struggling to pay, but did pay. Now I am in limbo and now have the increased stress of dealing with this council on multiple angles.

 

I cannot help but think this is designed to meake me give up and go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked closer at the new bill. It states Demand reason: Payment Method Change

 

Being in a position where I can no longer afford to pay council tax and having made a vaild claim after paying at the beginning of November, I cancelled the direct debit to prevent further payments being taken in the belief that I would no longer be liable to pay. I did not expect the council to literally pounce like a hungry lion.

 

I must say that on visiting their very nice offices last week to take evidence in, I noted the very high quality of the keyboards they type on, the huge monitors, the luxury chairs and when I commented on how warm it was was told they have underfloor heating. No wonder they pounce for more money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked closer at the new bill. It states Demand reason: Payment Method Change

 

Being in a position where I can no longer afford to pay council tax and having made a vaild claim after paying at the beginning of November, I cancelled the direct debit to prevent further payments being taken in the belief that I would no longer be liable to pay. I did not expect the council to literally pounce like a hungry lion.

 

I must say that on visiting their very nice offices last week to take evidence in, I noted the very high quality of the keyboards they type on, the huge monitors, the luxury chairs and when I commented on how warm it was was told they have underfloor heating. No wonder they pounce for more money!

 

The offices might be rented...

 

If you lapsed your D/D the council tax team would not know that you had made a claim- it's a separate department. Hence the demand.

 

Have you looked into what other benefits you can cla ?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you all so much again. What a shame you are not the people I have to deal with.

 

I get the higher rate of DLA mobility anyway but really cannot be doing with the stress levels of something so fundamental as claiming council tax benefit that I am completely entitled to do. I had no way of knowing that stopping the direct debit would trigger a panic at the council. I am not in arrears one penny. I am so tempted to just pay it off for the year and forget the whole claim - which is what I think they would like.

 

I have never had to deal with them before and never truly appreciated it when I hear of horror stories and people getting so upset. But am beginning to understand why. I realize they have to protect the public purse against fraud etc, but to tar everyone with the same brush - or that is how it feels - seems just the wrong way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had no way of knowing that stopping the direct debitlink3.gif would trigger a panic at the council

thats how it is unfortunately, all automated and contracted out (to capita).

if you can, try speaking direct to yr council (even though capita are now inhouse) rather than the call centre.

the adjustment bill shld have an option for dd. cld just do that again. then see how the claim goes in the mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Previously you were on a 12 monthly payment scheme and they've defaulted back to a 10 month - unless you've requested this then they have no legal powers to change the payment plan. The choice of whether you use a 10 month or 12 month plan is yours (unless you've lost the right to pay by instalments).

 

http://lgfa92.co.uk/council-tax-paying-over-12-instalments/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you all so much again. What a shame you are not the people I have to deal with.

 

I get the higher rate of DLA mobility anyway but really cannot be doing with the stress levels of something so fundamental as claiming council tax benefit that I am completely entitled to do. I had no way of knowing that stopping the direct debit would trigger a panic at the council. I am not in arrears one penny. I am so tempted to just pay it off for the year and forget the whole claim - which is what I think they would like.

 

I have never had to deal with them before and never truly appreciated it when I hear of horror stories and people getting so upset. But am beginning to understand why. I realize they have to protect the public purse against fraud etc, but to tar everyone with the same brush - or that is how it feels - seems just the wrong way.

It's not so much a panic attack as computer says no.. most councils have these letters triggered automatically.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But can you imagine the distress it can cause someone with certain medical conditions? I do not WANT to claim, I NEED to claim. I am not doing anything wrong by doing so as I am completely entitled to do so. But when you claim thinking that they will reduce or cover the remaining council tax bill, they then send you a demand for more than double what I was paying, it causes alarm. The wordiong on the back fo this new bill is entirely about different methods of how you can pay them as well as a warning that failure to pay can result in prosecution etc.

 

Nice to know that the very people I have been paying for for years, are the people who will not help when I need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get where you are coming from. I needed to change direct debit date due to a change in job last year. I rang and explained to them what I was doing and why (change of pay date) and still the lapsing of a d/d caused a deluge of letters. The wording is pretty strong as they don't differentiate between the evaders and the genuine.

 

That's the problem of automated systems.

 

I know none of that helps you

  • Haha 1

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the dd cancel not change things?

 

Not unless it has lead to either you failing to pay an amount on a reminder within 7 days of it's issuing or a final notice within 14 days of it's issuing.

 

Cancelling a direct debit in itself does not change your payment plan - they likely would revert it to a cash plan but the right to determine the 10/12 month plan is yours alone (unless you've lost the right to instalments)

 

Craig

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unless it has lead to either you failing to pay an amount on a reminder within 7 days of it's issuing or a final notice within 14 days of it's issuing.

 

Cancelling a direct debit in itself does not change your payment plan - they likely would revert it to a cash plan but the right to determine the 10/12 month plan is yours alone (unless you've lost the right to instalments)

 

Craig

 

I wasn't aware I could opt for 12 months. Good to know.

 

Though I enjoy my two "free" months in feb/march to come away from 10 months. The extra £140 a month is nice :)

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unless it has lead to either you failing to pay an amount on a reminder within 7 days of it's issuing or a final notice within 14 days of it's issuing.

 

Cancelling a direct debit in itself does not change your payment plan - they likely would revert it to a cash plan but the right to determine the 10/12 month plan is yours alone (unless you've lost the right to instalments)

 

Craig

cheers, thats what i meant. following just a dd cancel, it gets auto adjusted to back to cash. but, there shld still be an option on the bill to go back on instalments, albeit maybe adjusted to reflect the last missed dd (provided as you say its not in collection.) if that makes sense :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers, thats what i meant. following just a dd cancel, it gets auto adjusted to back to cash. but, there shld still be an option on the bill to go back on instalments, albeit maybe adjusted to reflect the last missed dd (provided as you say its not in collection.) if that makes sense :)

 

They can change the payment plan back to cash payments (which is actually sensible if a DD has been ended) but they have no right to change whether someone is on the statutory 10/12 month instalment plan or not - if you were on a 10 month DD then they can could change it to a 10 month cash plan (and give you whatever available instalments are left in the year) but they couldn't just change it to a 12 month cash (well, not without permission from you).

 

Just because the DD has ended doesn't lose the right to pay by instalments - the right to pay by instalments can only legally end with a default on a reminder or final notice.

 

Unless a person has legally lost the right to pay by instalments then they have the right to swap between the 10 & 12 month plan at their own discretion, the council have no say in the matter.

 

Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...