Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excel counselling for West Brom Build Soc chasing mortgage shortfall CCJ from 2006


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No pm received either

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seem to get messages all over to cover and hide all identification etc, security breaches & libelous liabilities etc....

 

Yes you have to be careful not to give too much information, but general information about who is chasing the debt and what action is taking place is not going to hurt. Without the information, it makes it difficult for online forums to assist.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading back at the thread, it seems any CCJ was obtained in 2006 or before. Although the CCJ might exist, there is no current power from the courts to enforce this debt. There might have been an attempt to get a court to reopen this, but a Judge has so far refused.

 

There is nothing you can currently do. If they want to employ a process server to serve documents on you, relating to an application they want to make to a court, then let them do this. Come back for advice if you hear any more.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was given to understand that it was enforceable for 12 years due to being a Mortgage debt, like 12 years till statute barred?

 

They have 12 years from when the debt was created to gain a CCJ. Once they get the CCJ it provides for an initial 6 years to enforce the judgement. If they want longer, they need to apply to a court. Given how long it has been since the CCJ, it might be difficult to make a successful application for more time to enforce.

 

If you think about it, there has to be a time limit on how long a claimant has to enforce a CCJ, otherwise a claimant could just wait 20, 30 years for circumstances to change.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that sounds great for me then, as they got me in to a court building in about 2006 & never followed it up, just took details & waved me out the door! seemed odd at the time that they didnt chase me up immediately, i opened up a credit report thing with noddle & clearscore last october to see if i had a CCJ & there was nothing, but after checking my reports etc i saw that west brom was checking my cred report too

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wanted to know what the claimant was up to, you could contact the Court in Nuneaton for a copy of the claimants application. If you phone them, they might be able to do this for no fee. However If necessary you can make a formal request to the Court under CPR 5.4 for a full copy of the claimants application and they will charge you a fee of about £12 to cover photocopying etc.

 

It might be useful to know this, as a Judge looked at it and refused. Next time if they apply, you have the previous Court application and copy of the Judges decision, which you can point to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive got my doubts this CCJ was legit anyway

if you handed the keys back in 1994

and they got the CCJ in 2006

that's outside the MLC 6yrs shortfall limit.

 

 

and now they're trying to enforce the CCJ.

they are seriously having a laugh.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

mortgage lending council.

 

 

“Lenders are committed to fair and sympathetic treatment of people who have suffered repossession, and accept that individuals should not face long delays before lenders contact them to discuss repayment of the shortfall”.

 

“From 11th February 2000 lenders who are members of The Council of Mortgage Lenders have agreed voluntarily that they will begin all recovery action for the shortfall within the first six years following the sale of a property in repossession. Anyone whose property was taken into possession and sold more than 6 yearslink3.gif ago, and who has not been contacted by their lender about recovering any outstanding debt will not now be asked to pay the shortfall”.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that sounds promising!

 

ringing the court now, the woman says the claim began in 2008!

 

first i heard was oct 2016! they've had my address since 2006

 

weird,

the phone call has me worried,

 

she said that there have been lots of letters sent to me at my address

one an order to attend court in march

& that if i ignore i could go to prison,

seems odd,

ive received nothing except one visit from excel,

that was ages ago!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent to yopur address?

have they been posting stuff to a previous addy either on purpose or by a filing error?

 

 

Ask for copies of everything,

you may have to pay for the photocopying

but once you have it all you can complain about the abuse of process if they have been sending things to an incorrect address

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

weird why take 6 weeks to post a letter dated 17th which is meaningless

you've not had any order to attend with a date have you?

 

 

time to ring her again me thinks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reading is that the claimant made aplication to the court back in March and since that date they have tried to personally service notice on the OP to attend the court on a given date. This failed and the Judge was asked to consider alternative service back in July. The Judge decided recently that notice to attend court for questioning can be posted to the OP and that Is all the court documents says.

 

The OP will receive notice in the next few weeks that they need to attend court on x date/time to questioned about their ability to pay the Judgement.

 

What we need to see is the original court judgement and any other paperwork. The question is whether the judgement can still be enforced or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

will the original court judgement have been made in my absence then uncle B? ive not been to any hearings of any kind, nor been summonsed except to the nuneaton court building back when i had to show bank details, i never went before a judge, just a chap asking questions.

how do i get to see a copy of the original?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look back at the thread, it was suggested to you, that you needed to get hold of copies of all court documents relating to you. Most important is the CCJ in 2006. You can request copies of all documents held by the court that dealt with it. If you never attended, the court will have record of what the claimant submitted and the judgement.

 

You have to remember that when Judges are asked to look at something, they only look at what is in front of them. They won't have all of the court records from previous hearings or applications. It is your task to get hold of all records and to properly defend your position. Failure to do so, will mean you end up being told by the court to pay the claimant amounts, that you might not have had to pay, if you had fully researched your position, making relevant arguments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...