Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin Media salesman cold calling

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2902 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I went on the Virgin Media website to see what I could get.

I put in my address and postcode - nothing else.


I found the information I needed and decided I'd think about it for a while.


Within two days a Virgin media person was on my doorstep.

I have a very clear no cold calling, no sales people sign.

He knocked regardless.


I was pretty agitated already by the arrogance and contempt for my no cold calling sign

not to mention the principle of sending someone out to chase up the loosest of enquires.

I assumed he would get the message as he could see us ignoring him through the living room window.


He buggered off and I hoped that would be the end of it.


I was mistaken, he called AGAIN tonight just as I sat down for dinner. With this I was LIVID.


I opened the door and asked him why he was knocking, to which he said "Did you make an enquiry with us?".


I pointed to my sign and said "Can you read" to which he replied "if you've made an enqury it's not a cold call!"




I asked him what my name was and he obviously stumbled and looked blank.

"Have I invited you?"

"Then you're a called caller"


He made his protests and I got really furious

"how dare you read that and disregard it, wilfully choosing to interrupt my evening"


Things escalated and I threw several extremely strong insults his way

and then told him to get off my property in 5 seconds or I would get physical.


At some point I also recall telling him he could shove his fibre optic cable.


I am absolutely shocked at the arrogance of this company.

To come back AFTER you have read the sign and clearly been ignored. What was he expecting.


Now i'm stuck. I don't want to pay BT prices and I don't want a company like Virgin in my life.



Edited by Andyorch
Link to post
Share on other sites

there no backing for you to complain anywhere

TS nor the police will be the least bit interested.



there are no 'rules' to back up displaying such a notice sadly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You absolutely shouldn't call something silly just because that's your personal opinion. You should be setting an example to others, maybe even the odd constructive post.

Even if there were no legal standing to such a sticker does that make it "silly" or "meaningless"? No, because any decent human being would respect it regardless.


If you see a ‘please keep off the grass’ sign do you think, ‘there is no legal standing behind that or anyone they can complain to ‘? – Therefore I’ll walk all over it?


Trading standards actively recommend such signage and ignoring it is a breach of Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 under Schedule 1, paragraph 25.

Citizens Advice website asks people to report traders who ignore these signs to them and Trading Standards are also keeping track of firms that break the rules.

Edited by Andyorch
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not illegal to cold call and neither is it illegal for the salesman to ignore such a notice.


The only exception will be if the local Council/Police have set up a "No Cold Calling Zone" such as a residential area for the elderly where the police will be asked to attend. Even then there is not a lot that can be done in reality

Link to post
Share on other sites

that sign is not recommended by the police nor TS



its what you have downloaded from somewhere

and is readily available under an image search on yahoo images or alike


it is NOT from the Police or TS or like schemes run by them.

you should be absolutely certain what you post is accurate

it is not


that's what siteteam is here for.


back to your org point that you ranted about..

if I was in a cabled virmin area

i'd grab a deal with them with both hands

their cabled/fibre broadband far outstrips anything

that any provider gives via a phoneline

and far far cheaper.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Three things.


1. The point of this post is to not to establish to law. It's to warn others that if they make the vaguest of enquires with VM they will follow up with aggressive sales tactics and you will have a fight to get rid of an unexpected caller that a lot of people won't want. You would like that. Good for you. IF your elderly or just don't like salesman on your door stop you won't.


2. Even if you assume there is no legal substance behind it that does not make it silly or meaningless. Any human with the ability to read can establish the sentiment and come to the conclusion it's probably not a good idea to knock.


3. The precise wording/design of that particular sign is not a trading standards one - granted. But that wasn't what you said. You said there were NO signs that would be approved by TS when there are and the legislation I mention supports them. Again your wrong. My sign is very similar and contains all the right words. Would you ignore a “height restriction” sign just because it hadn’t been put up by the council?

It doesn't NEED to be endorsed by them to have a meaning!



Such signs are recommended by trading standards.

Here is just one example of a sign provided by Coventry TS.


Plenty of other examples out there from councils and alike.


It’s not about the legality. It doesn’t need to be. But if you still want to bark up that tree go and read the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading as indicated above.



And anyway none of this is the point of this thread, I just wanted to make others aware of what would happen.

Edited by Andyorch
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I actually agree with the OP on this occasion. Why? I am what the call the block voice and I volunteer my time and effort to keep the estate clean tidy and free from vagabonds and cold callers.


I have a post in relation to a certain church group that constantly cold called to discuss their form of religion on my doorstep. I find this very annoying due to mobility isues as they have normally moved on to neighbours by the time I get to the door.


I also attend Local Community Meetings ( LCM) run by the Police and with others from around my ward. The Police listen and sent me an Officer in full uniform no less to hand me 36 of their do not call stickers. This had no effect on these callers.


Now beng an ardent CAGGER I have access to our library where we all know of a version of a document that stops or tries to stop 'doorsteppers' this is the Shepherd and Short case.


I have now twice printed off this case in full and denied them access to cold call on this estate. They chose to ignore it. I then sent a copy of this the my beat Sergeant explained what it means and how they (the Police) should deal with this unsocial act.


The result that I was able to get from the Police was for them to send an officer in uniform to this church and TELL them not to cold call anymore.


In our case it has had the desired effect. Then I asked the same Officer to do the same for all 'halls' in the Borough which they did as they had many complaints of this nature but didn't know how to deal with it properly.


So with this in mind there will be a no cold calling group set up and assistance offered if need be. But, sorry for this it helps if there is an amount of vulnerable adults/residents in the area as these people need protecting from scoundrels.


The case I have referred to is useful at times and can be helpful..


Also as a customer of Virgin they have a postcode checker service but don't ask for a house number.


Finally it's not about what you know it's how you use it that gets the job done...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on what people consider to be a cold/unsolicited call. It can be argued, as the salesman did, that you requested more information. By giving your address out he could surmise that he wasn't an unsolicited call. The issue becomes clouded by you needing to put your address into the website to find out what you could get. You were simply trying to help yourself and needed to input your address to do that.


One question that I do have though is why were you so livid about it? Why did you get furious when he argued his point, the same one I'm making above. Why did you consider it necessary to throw insults his way, and threaten violence? You could have simply told him you had looked at the site and were considering what you found. That you can make the decision yourself and don't need any assistance and then wish him goodbye. That way, you wouldn't have got so worked up and your dinner would still be warm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied and re opened.

We could do with some help from you.



Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...