Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’  
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
    • or go really bold ... Further to my request for a copy of the agreement you refer to on ( date) I made a section 78 request pursuant to the Credit Consumer Act 1974 to which you have yet to reply or respond. Pursuant to the Credit Consumer act 1974 section 78 (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.
    • Pers I'd stop paying the lot and get each defaulted by a dn issuance.  Defaults can't hurt future renting no Only ccj's Can't keep saying the same answers.    Dx        
    • Ok thank you. That’s where we are getting confused, as we’re not sure where we stand legally. But we’re still unsure who we should be going to now, the dealer or the finance company? I’m assuming the evidence we have (the reports from Mercedes) showing that the fault was there when we purchased would be sufficient to prove this? To be honest we would prefer to send the car back completely as are now concerned more problems may arise.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can the council charge to correct damage done by them to your private property?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Around a year or two ago the an underground ditch drain pipe started to leak and come up after some heavy rain, my parents who were living here at the time called the council to get it fixed.

 

The council then dug up the drain but left it as an open ditch on our land, without asking us first... (we would have said no)

The council refuse to correct the damage done, and say we must pay to repair it ourselves or pay them to do it.

 

We never asked them to dig up the ditch. They did that on there own accord.

 

Do we have any legal backing to force them to correct the damage done?

 

And can this work be classed as criminal damage as it was done without our blessing?

ditch before.jpg

ditch1.jpg

ditch2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe they can dig up a drain to avoid damage to other properties/highways etc and it is then the landowners responsibility to repair that damage. I had the same thing happen to a family member. I believe they went to see a solicitor and got told that its not something that they(my family) can pursue. I believe, if my memory serves, that hone insurance kicked in.

I suppose it depends on what it was for though. Can you explain a bit more? Why did thy dig? Did they ask to dig? What type of drain?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a ditch drain thats open every so often. Its open on the other side of the drive (far end of the picture) and that has been open since my mum was a child...

From what my parents told me it was when we had loads of heavy rain there was some localised flooding around the area as well... (not caused by the ditch) But the rain was heavy enough to make the pipe burst under ground and water came up...

 

The ditch and areas of underground pipe run along side of the road all the way up to the top of the street.

 

It wasnt going to cause more damage to the area, it was just a drain pipe that burst and needed repair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what you said they fixed the pipe but they won't cover the ditch, correct?

If so, just get some friendly builder to cover the ditch with their rubble (which will drain better than earth and free) and then cover the last few inches with a bit of soil.

Job done and everyone is happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it should be closed no open. it wasn't open before. And the problem is, its our land. And now with how they left it its difficult to maintain. We cant mow it or do any thing do it if we wanted to...

 

Its our property not the councils. And they have caused damage to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nutsy

 

I am sorry to say that the council is correct

if it on your land then it is your responsibility.

Same as a ditch on a farmers land they have to maintain it.

I am supprised they did not charge for the initial problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may not be the case

To me it was properly done by the house holder at some point, I am not saying you did it, but a previous HH.

Rule of thumb

The ditch is the other side of your hedge from the house,

this normally means it is the House holders property (ditch)

You will need to research this more, but I think you will find it was your pipe not the councils

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your point being,

The boundary would have been the ditch,

which would have been owned by the House Holder.

The pipe would not have been 100 years old

check the council records, if they had done it it would show.

if not leave it as it is or pay for the repair!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it may be unfair but it is for you to make good, despite it being a public drain. the same applies to pipes and cables running across your property to someone else's, you have to maintain them. In practice the local water board or electric co will do all of the necessaries and make good as well as they can but you wont get any sympathy if you then claim for the loss of your prize dahlias. What they have done is serviceable but if you want to restore a culvert you may ahve to ask permission so as to take into account flooding of adjacent land

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...