Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Irresponsible lending advice required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just discovered that my elderly mother inlaw (73) who is on income support

has been getting regular loans from a local agent for provident.

 

 

It would appear that a neighbour is drug dependant has been regularly getting money from her

and so she has borrowed to support herself.

 

 

There are two payment books in her possession which have a total of 5 different account numbers across the two books

and are very difficult to understand.

 

 

I can see on one occasion she was given two separate loans for £1000 each over the course of twenty days ( total credit £4200)

surely the agent from provident would be starting to ask questions.

 

 

How can an elderly person who gets income support be expected to pay over 50% of their benefit on loans.

I have since moved her away from the area she lives,

so the neighbour problem is sorted for now,

just need to get my head round this provident stuff.

 

 

Any help advice anyone can offer would be greatly appreciated.

 

I have asked my mother inlaw what documentation she was asked to provide as evidence of income / benefit

of which she informed me that it was all verbal,

the agent asks how much and that was that.

 

 

I also asked how she found out about them and she said she got a card posted through the door.

Posting loan cards through old age pensions bungalows is disgusting.

 

I am happy to provide

Link to post
Share on other sites

so sorry you seem to have been missed.

 

On the surface of what you say she should never have been given the loans of that amount on IS

 

Are the loans still being paid?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you able to be at your mums when this 'agent' turns up for payment?

 

£73 a week is criminal!

 

I'd be lodging a formal complaint ASAP with Provi, and making a lot of noise about this 'agent' they employ.

 

Exhaust their complaints procedure and make it clear from the beginning that you intend on making this public, in the local and national press, and all over social media, as well as your intent on making formal complaints about their lending practices to the CMA and trading standards.

 

Get you local MP in on it also, this has to stop, exploiting the vulnerable is morally wrong.

 

Can your mum afford £73 a week?

I strongly doubt it, IMO and if I were in your shoes, I'd be telling this 'agent' exactly what they will be paid, and it would be no more than £10 a month, see how they like them apples!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Lucy.

 

I can't believe they lent your Mum that amount of money on that level of income. Actually, from what I know of Provident, it's possible.

 

Does your Mum have any paperwork from the meetings when these loans were set up? Provident are supposed to check that the person can afford the loan within their income.

 

If you have things like this, it will help you to prove irresponsible lending.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not our intention to return back to her house on Monday to meet the agent as we live quite far apart. Will we be able to do everything in writing and set up some sort of way of paying a minimal amount remotely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have recovered all the paperwork she has, all of which are just loan agreements, we are unable to find any evidence of any income and expenditure form being completed or any formal requests being signed to authorise any credit search.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing everything in writing is most certainly the preferred method, as you need a paper trail of evidence to screw these into the ground!

 

If you get their email address then you can email them also, which is perfectly acceptable, and I would be jumping all over it today in order to stop this payment on Monday.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have read on many threads on here that a minimum payment of £1 per week or month should be offered, is this correct information or should we be refusing to pay anything until a full investigation is carried out by provident ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it matters about your mums credit file then i would go down the irresponsible lending complaint letter route, preferably to be received by them before the next payment is due on monday. Once the account is placed in dispute it should hold them off while they investigate their sad selves.

If you go straight for paying £1 a week they will trash it, which they may do anyway but if you can get your complaint upheld, either by themselves or FCA then any adverse info can be removed by order.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello there. What was the outcome of this with provident as I'm in a similar situation with my brother who although up to his eyes in debt has managed to get serveral loans from them which he has no means to repay. His credit file is shot and he has no income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome Harbyg,

 

The thread starter Lucy68 has not been on the forum since the 5th of May, you would be better starting a new thread in the appropriate forum for some advice.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...