Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EOS - Atlantik - Freemans / Cleaning up credit record


ddaddy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

We have been looking at cleaning up my girlfriends credit record

there where 2 entries from Freemans and one from Atlantik.

 

One Freemans account stated it had been settled and closed in 2010 with the last record update in 2010.

The other Freemans entry defaulted in 2011 and although not stated on the record, it was settled in 2013 through debt collection.

We wrote to Freemans and they say they will update the record to reflect that it was eventually settled.

 

The matter we have issue with,

is a record for Atlantik that shows a default in 2010 for £357 and they last updated the record in 2015.

They claim this is another Freemans debt which my gf doesn't recall.

 

We're not wanting to get out of paying this, I would pay it today if I have to.

Our worry is the fact that if we settle this today it will still be other credit record for the next 6 years,

whereas if it was in fact settled year ago then it shouldn't be in this state.

 

We wrote to EOS which is the company listed on the credit record for Atlantik, asking for more information.

They simply responded with a bill for the £357.

 

So a couple of days later we responded with the following letter:

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or it’s clients.

 

With reference to the statement you sent dated 10/02/2016 stating a debt of £357.34, I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond with you further on this matter.

 

template..cca

 

Your faithfully

We heard nothing back, so later sent the following:

Dear Sir/Madam

 

FORMAL NOTICE - ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE.

old template removed -dx

Yours faithfully

They responded a few days later, acknowledging the complaint saying they have passed it to Atlantik F.GmbH (Freemans Oli) and that they have put the account on hold.

 

4 weeks later we received another letter from them saying:

I am writing to you today in relation to the complaint you raised on the above account.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of the Credit Agreement and please not the the statement for the above account has been requested.

 

You have previously advised that Freemans Oli had confirmed to you that your account was paid in full on 07/05/2013; I ask if you can please provide sufficient proof of this.

 

Your account will remain on hold until I am in receipt of the statement, once received I will forward this onto you.

 

 

Now the credit agreement they sent has not been signed or even completed with any contact details.

It is simply a photocopy of an Oli.co.uk credit agreement.

It says in big letters at the bottom IMPORTANT: THE RETURNS SECTION OF THIS AGREEMENT MUST BE SIGNED AND SENT BACK TO US AT...

So why can they not supply us a copy of the signed agreement?

 

9 days later, they sent a letter to my girlfriends fathers very old address

(Luckily after 2 moves, he now lives next door to where he used to live, so he got passed the mail)

saying they are trying to contact the addressee on the letter regarding a personal matter etc.

. I think it's a standard fishing letter when trying to find someone.

 

2 days after that, they sent another letter to her fathers old address

(Please bare in mind, all previous letters were received at our current address)

saying:

I am writing to you today in relation to the complaint you raised on the above account.

 

We have received a response from our client Atlantik F.GmbH (Freemans Oli) who have advised the account was opened on 17/05/2007 at the address of : OUR CURRENT ADDRESS! which was also the delivery address.

A copy of the statement has also been sent to you. No statement was attached

 

A letter was previously sent to you requesting proof that our client Atlantik F.GmbH (Freemans Oli) confirmed to you that your account was paid in full on 07/05/2013, unfortunately we have not yet received this.

I ask if you can please send this to us to enable me to investigate this fully.

 

Please be advised your account will remain on hold for a period of 14 days to allow you time to respond to this letter with the relevant information.

If we do not receive contact from you within this time, the hold will be released and we will continue with out collection commitments.

 

I can offer you a full and final settlement on the account today for £268.01 which will be valid for 30 days,

unfortunately there is no payment arrangement available on a full and final settlement, therefore it would be a one off payment.

 

I hope you find this satisfactory, however if you have any further concerns please contact us directly or please be aware that you have a six month period from the date of this letter to refer this matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

 

Before we were passed these letters from her fathers neighbour, we had already responded with the following:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I have received your letter dated 6th April 2016 and a copy of a Credit Agreement,

however the Credit Agreement you have sent is simply a generic copy of a Credit Agreement

and not a Credit Agreement that I recognise that I have signed.

 

Any Credit Agreement that I have signed should be readily available as proof of your legal right to default this account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute.

 

Furthermore, I have enclosed a letter that I received from Freemans stating that there are no outstanding debts or agreements with them.

 

Finally, you have not sent the requested statement of account which leads me to believe this account never existed or is simply a duplicate of the already settled accounts.

 

As such, I request that you remove any current and previous entries regarding this matter from my Credit Reference with all agencies that you have dealings with.

 

 

Yours faithfully

And finally, this week received a response, again to her fathers old address:

 

I am writing in response to your recent correspondence received in our office today.

 

Unfortunately we are unable to provide a signed copy of your agreement so will not be taking label action to enforce recovery of the outstanding balance, however a reconstituted copy of your current credit agreement with our client was provided. This approach is consistent with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, as amended.

 

As you will be aware the reconstituted credit agreement that was supplied complies with all legal requirements. As such it is our intentions to recommence collections activities on this account.

 

In response to the correspondence you enclosed with your letter received today,

unfortunately the account mentioned in the letter is not this account.

 

 

Your client reference number for this account is: A30117122700701

the reference number mentioned in the letter is for the account of: C12923176700701.

A copy of the statements was posted to you on 12/04/2016,

however I have attached these again within this letter.

 

Please be advised your account will remain on hold for a period of 14 days to allow you time to respond to this letter to discuss a payment arrangement if you are unable to make this payment in full.

If we do not receive contact from you within this time, the hold will be released and we will continue with our collection commitments.

 

With this letter, was many pages of computer screenshots showing monthly statements of purchases, payments, and many Dolt Reminder Fee's.

 

For completeness, her is the letter we received from Freemans.com:

Thank you for your letter dated 5th February 2016 which has been passed for my attention in relation to credit files enquiry.

 

I have investigated the matters you have raised and note that you had two accounts on your agency ending with A701 which shows as closed. The information recorded on the credit files for this account is correct.

 

Account ending with A702 was a flex account which you defaulted and was passed to an external debt collection agency Moorcroft.

This account was paid in full on 7th May 2013.

I have amended the credit reference bureaux to reflect that the account has been fully satisfied which should resolve your enquiry.

 

 

 

Both account numbers mentioned by EOS end with A701, so is it possible it is in fact the same account?

 

What should my response to this now be?

They can't supply a signed credit agreement, and can't even get our address right.

 

Like I said to begin with, we haven't got a problem paying it, but this only came to light when my gf checked her credit records and noticed it, so it's been lingering on her record all this time, and if we settle it it will linger for another 6 years.

 

Thanks for any input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the path you have taken is a wee bit old hat now.

as long as a debt is defaulted

then it will vanish on the defaults 6th birthday regardless to it being paid or not.

 

 

paying off debts 'to improve' someones credit rating,

is sadly a bit of an old myth now if they are defaulted

 

 

that marker [which can only be placed by the original creditor upon sale

if they don't still own the debt]

is there for 6yrs regardless

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the path you have taken is a wee bit old hat now.

as long as a debt is defaulted

then it will vanish on the defaults 6th birthday regardless to it being paid or not.

 

 

paying off debts 'to improve' someones credit rating,

is sadly a bit of an old myth now if they are defaulted

 

 

that marker [which can only be placed by the original creditor upon sale

if they don't still own the debt]

is there for 6yrs regardless

 

Thanks for the reply, however Atlantik last updated the credit record 03/05/2015, so it will still be there until 2021?

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the debt defaulted?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, defaulted 20/12/2010. So does that mean it'll disappear on 20/12/2016? correct.

Do you think I should just not reply to EOS now?

 

 

you should have ignored them in the first place.

don't forget

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

if debts are defaulted

theres nowt you can do to improve anyones credit file

even by paying it off.

 

 

as the ico say:

 

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.}

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

.

NOTE: {the bracketed text is not ICO guideline but my advise]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok that makes sense.

We were just worried seeing that they where still updating the record

and thought the 6 years wouldn't start until it's been settled.

 

As we only found out about the supposed debt 4 months ago,

our main goal was to get them to backdate/remove it from the record.

Waiting until December isn't too much of a big deal.

 

I guess I might write to them telling them that we won't be paying it

because we are not satisfied that it is in fact debt we have outstanding.

They've already said they won't be taking legal action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why invite pointless letter tennis?

 

 

that's what you did in the first place

big mistake.

 

 

EOS are very much bottom feeders.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...