Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Civil Enforcement Ltd PCN received at Hospital car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2950 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning All,

 

I bought parking ticket for duration of my hospital appointment at General Hospital in Manchester.

 

 

Upon return to my car I notice PCN stuck on windscreen from Civil Enforcement Ltd for reason 'parked in incorrect zone'.

 

 

I find this strange because last time I attended said hospital for same medical reason

I parked in the same zone, bought a ticket to cover my stay and no problem.

 

Any advice on how to challenge this would be appreciated, thanks in advance guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or you could make sure you are correct about the space and follow the appeal process to the end.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always wait for the NTK, otherwise you risk identifying the driver and allowing them to negate the PoFA.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree, wait for NTK which has to arrive between 29 and 56 days after the date of the event to be compliant with PoFA.

 

 

If it is before or after this time then no keeper liability and you can then complain to a number of bodies about the matter, including the hospital trust.

 

is there signage at the hospital that specifically says that you can only park in a certain place with the P&D ticket you bought?

 

 

If not then no breach and they are trying to get money when none is due.

Another reason to complain to hospital trust when the time comes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there signage at the hospital that specifically says that you can only park in a certain place with the P&D ticket you bought? If not ten no breach and they are trying to get money when none is due. Another reason to complain to hospital trust when the time comes.

 

Many thanks guys for all response, I really appreciate them.

 

 

I didn't see any sign post saying don't park where I parked.

If per chance any of you know North Manchester Central Hospital,

 

 

I parked in zone 2, left of Entrance 1. In front of main entrance gate is a parking zone Disabled/Elderly Patients,

That is clearly sign posted even on the ground.

 

 

The left of this zone is zone 2 where I parked (in white marked bay not disabled bay).

I still don't understand why I was issued PCN.

I stand to be corrected if anybody knows this hospital well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks guys for all response, I really appreciate them. I didn't see any sign post saying don't park where I parked. If per chance any of you know North Manchester Central Hospital, I parked in zone 2, left of Entrance 1. In front of main entrance gate is a parking zone Disabled/Elderly Patients, That is clearly sign posted even on the ground. The left of this zone is zone 2 where I parked (in white marked bay not disabled bay). I still don't understand why I was issued PCN. I stand to be corrected if anybody knows this hospital well

 

Keep the ticket you paid for safe. And as already advised, wait for the NTK through the post and update this thread when received.

 

What colour zone was the car parked in? It seems that every sign should have this information on;

 

Who can park where?

 

http://www.pat.nhs.uk/getting-here/car-parking.htm

 

I bet they don't...

 

And the trust site search brings up APCOA signage.

 

http://www.pat.nhs.uk/search-results.htm?sitekit=true&task=search&indexname=Site+Search&search=car+parking+policy

 

 

This trust has also had issues with their chosen parking enforcement contractors, which are on going.

Keep an eye on this foi thread;

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_on_trust_land#comment-68169

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello All,

 

Update:

 

Please note that I received NTO last Saturday 6/5/2016 stating:

failure to £70 within 28 days may result in them proceeding with debt recovery action

and/or issue court proceedings against me.

 

 

I wish I could appeal this via email...

 

 

I really don't want to waste postage cost for this guys

 

 

www.ce-service.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

A notice to keeper??

 

What does it say, can you scan and post up a redacted copy of it, DON'T do anything yet.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Notice To Keeper.

 

I'll scan and post copy here; could someone pls confirm website used to redate and resize scan documents.

 

 

 

 

 

A notice to keeper??

 

What does it say, can you scan and post up a redacted copy of it, DON'T do anything yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does it say you have done wrong? The letter must contain a minimum amount of information to be legal so it should say where the parking event was, what the breach of contract was and who the creditors are. As CEL are a bunch of lying bandits it would be worth asking the hospital who they signed up to do their parking control as a FOI request ( I know this has already been done but CEL may well be undone by the Companies Act rather than a false claim of parking in the wrong zone so worth having in writing) Agree a scan will help us no end.

Dont appeal yet but when you do one of the things to ask for is proof of parking in the wrong zone. They will have a picture of your car ticket but I bet that is the only proof of where it was that day so that will ruin any legal claim for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NTK not compliant with PoFA, it doesnt say who the creditor is and doesnt say anything about a claim for keeper liability if you dont provide a name and address for service of the driver, doesnt mention PoFA to create this liability etc.

Usual pile of poo from Ashley Cohen front company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I fail to understand is why the administrators who sign the contracts with these crooks dont actually follow due dilligence before they commit a public body and their patients to paying hard earned cash out to the undeserving. They should be sacked for gross dereliction of duty but they all get promoted out to another hospital trust when it goes pear shaped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I fail to understand is why the administrators who sign the contracts with these crooks dont actually follow due dilligence before they commit a public body and their patients to paying hard earned cash out to the undeserving. They should be sacked for gross dereliction of duty but they all get promoted out to another hospital trust when it goes pear shaped.

 

Thanks ericbrothers. Do you think ignoring this ntk is ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericbrothers. Do you think ignoring this ntk is ok?

 

No, you do not ignore it. You appeal as the RK denying liability for the charge.

 

But wait till to tomorrow for further advice please...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rerspond to it saying the following:

the notice to keeper, ref XXXXX is not complaint with the PoFA 2012 and therefore no keeper liability exists.

Make a request to the DVLA and demand to know who has accessed your details for that vehicle and complain that this has been done improperly as there is no probable cause to do so as there is no keeper liability in this matter. I would also bet that it is another one of Ashleys dodgy companies that did the accessing such as on of the Creative or Star parking companies he runs without giving Companies house the correct ownership details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...