Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

And the possibility of secret commissions paid to the broker

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a read of that before posting the question, and read that institutions are not obliged to send copies of documents, as they quoted but with the response earlier saying that the ICO or a court of law wouldn't like their reply I thought I would ask, what I learnt/had read on here whilst dealing with other companies I was under the impression they had to send copies of anything that was relevant to the requester?

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contact the ICO and have the conversation with them regarding GE's response, i think they may see things differently but as i dont work for them i cant guarantee that.

With regard to secret commissions? There would have been some sort of payment to the broker for brokering the mortgage.

Isnt this tho about transferring the equity?

You seem to be picking some very difficult points to raise and not focussing on what you originally want to achieve. Dont get bogged down with the other factors, concentrate on getting the equity transferred, in the easiest way you can, any other issues can be looked at later.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I'm asking questions as Kensington aren't playing ball

and you advised to walk away from a fight with them due to costs,

 

 

GE money aren't playing ball with the SAR and I've come across the miss selling of mortgages

and hiden commissions paid that are unlawful which I'm sure the initial mortgage was,

 

 

there is the fact that I want to remove my ex wife of the mortgage

but if initially there was fault or unlawful actions its something I would want to proceed with.

 

 

. I have an appointment with my solicitor regarding the TR1 next week.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok pop back on when youve had the meet but that transfer is the priority for you, thats the reason you came here

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it may be the reason I came here but have uncovered other sides to the initial mortgage agreement, sorry should I start another thread regarding the other issues maybe in the legal forum??? didnt want to start a new thread and have it merged that was all..

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to at the moment, just concentrate on the transfer for now, the other issues will still be there later, dont get bogged down with it all in one go

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its related then its better in one place

but as pointed, one step at a time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with Martin actually hadituptothere.....frustrating though it is to find all these things, you're heading for a legal costs nightmare when you are dealing with the likes of Kensington.

 

These sub-prime suppliers are a well greased machine which relies on the Terms & Conditions when it suits them to take your complaints and pass them by a barrister, all at your cost under their t & c's. These costs will be added to your mortgage without a blink and you'll be paying interest at their far from competitive rates.

 

Take them on if you have deep pockets and don't rely upon the courts to produce for you the justice you seek because Kensington have a slick machine also for pulling the wool over Judges ears and eye's.

 

I understand you have found these other things like secret commissions, but welcome to the thousands who have preceded you who are sitting on repossession actions who tried and failed to get that justice. It's a lottery and a miracle if you find the right stage upon which to win, so pick your fights very carefully as we have learned to do...(Yes the Fan Club lives on!) and leave the costly chancer issues until later as dx100uk suggests, they'll still be there and one step at a time, but it could be those that break you so stick to your key issue first.

 

Speak to the ICO, they helped me prove a solicitors firm trying to fob me off on a DSAR as they were only a Data processor not a Data Controller, and I got lock stock and barrel supplied as a result - very revealing.

 

So focus and pick carefully. We always work on the premise in the Fan Club of 'the devil being in the detail and 'Keep it simple'. Get every piece of evidence in writing and study each and every word of what you get, back your arguments up with as much legilslation as you can find and never let the target divert you questions, just keep going back until you get the answers you ask.

 

One step at a time, pick your fights, Kensington will fleece you, rack up costs, not abide by the regulatory requirements and just play games with you all the time they hold the noose around your neck of holding your mortgage and title.

 

Hope that helps, but these guys on here are talking sense - run with them. I'm busy elsewhere, but good luck.

 

Andrew1

the Cabot Fan Club

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou andrew1, dx and Martin.

 

Hadituotohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Thankyou andrew1, dx and Martin.

 

Hadituotohere

 

Hi there,

 

I know this is a few months old now but am in a similar really difficult situation with Kensington (who are just awful I might add!) and am in desperate need of some help/advice if you can share your experience?

 

 

They too told me they no longer offer transfer of equity (amongst many other answers) and although on the land registry my property is recorded as 99% to me 1% to my ex husband they will not release him from the mortgage as they apparently do not offer TOE

 

 

yet if you google TOE Kensington mortgages one of the first hits is the application form, from Kensington, to complete and fill out,

 

 

I was also told by a friend of a friend (who is a conveyancer) that she deals with them regularly and they "do it all the time"

 

I'm as much at a loss as you sound with it all and at my wits end as I may find myself and my children homeless if I cannot find a resolution to this :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I know this is a few months old now but am in a similar really difficult situation with Kensington (who are just awful I might add!) and am in desperate need of some help/advice if you can share your experience?

 

They too told me they no longer offer transfer of equity (amongst many other answers) and although on the land registry my property is recorded as 99% to me 1% to my ex husband they will not release him from the mortgage as they apparently do not offer TOE

 

yet if you google TOE Kensington mortgages one of the first hits is the application form, from Kensington, to complete and fill out

 

I was also told by a friend of a friend (who is a conveyancer) that she deals with them regularly and they "do it all the time"

 

I'm as much at a loss as you sound with it all and at my wits end as I may find myself and my children homeless if I cannot find a resolution to this :(

 

 

it would be better if you start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I know this is an old thread but things didnt move forwards regarding my SAR to GE money and was left treading water..

 

As warned kensington have proved themselves to be the beast they have a reputation for..

 

I have a repossession hearing on the 29th October over arrears of around £1000.00, this includes late payment charges, home visits court costs etc..

 

well before GE money sold our underperforming mortgage to Kensington the DWP have paid the interest payments which as the mortgage was swapped to a 96% interest to 4% by GE money (and ourselves obviously)...

 

In April the DWP stopped paying the interest unless I swapped to a SMI loan which i was doing but being in such a bad place, family trauma's,

i have now in place and the DWP have paid £700+

 

to my detriment I was, had been and still am suffering from Depression and anxiety so my head was buried deep in the sand...

 

Needless to say since the last few weeks ive spoken to kensington who have said the Court date isnt repossession hearing despite the HM courts service and witness statement say

 

they want the court to

a) give the claimant possession of the premises and

b) to pay the claimant the total amount outstanding under the mortgage agreement.

 

I know i should communicate in writing with kensington but even writing this post is affecting me and finding difficult..

 

the adviser has asked for evidence from my consultant and GP to be emailed to them prior to the court hearing..

 

Just tried to file a defense with the Court and for some reason the possession claim website isnt available...

 

I know this is a late shout for help but stuck for where and what to do

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There no mcol for repo hearings

Its mail only

Their repo figure cannot inc penalty fees nor visit fees

but you say they are going for the full outstanding?

 

is that what the paperwork says..i bet no just arrears..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx and thank you for your quick response the letter from the County Court state that you can respond to this claim by visiting possessionclaim.gov.uk giving me a username and password????

 

could you please point me to the legislation regarding to the repo figure not including visiting fees and late fees as the chap from kensington claim their contractual..

 

a lot to ask and such short time and yes this is no-ones fault but my own.

 

 

Hadituiptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention that the adviser was happy to add the arrears onto the mortgage if i went through an income and expenditure with him and the court hearing would go ahead were kensington would ask for an order that x amount paid or they can proceed with repossession

 

hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes ofcourse I remember reading someone saying that a while back

I think we were all stunned it was actually in place now

not heard of it since mind:lol:

 

have you tried to create a new user then using the claim number?

 

anyway

 

hes an idea of what you need to do

 

if you don't have a full breakdown of how they have arrived at the figure they quote on the claim ask them for one by email

stay off that phone now

and disregard whatever they said for now.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?192794-SPML-repossession

 

N244 and budget sheet in short get it running soonest to the court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

struggling to sleep which is the norm and have found paperwork of mortgage arrears statement:

feb 2018 shortfall in mortgage payment DWP only paid 189.00 of the 257.00 payment due, same for march April may..

June no payment made as i hadn't been well enough to comply with the change over to the SMI Loan from the DWP

(although the DWP state my payments stopped on the 5th April 2018.

Arrears fee £30.00 incurred,

July two field agent fees applied at £48.00 plus late payment fee,

Arrears fee £30.00 applied August,

litigation fee of £65.00 applied,

October late payment fee £30.00.

 

DWP contacted me to say my SMI was set up and on the 1st October they paid £188+ for May, and future payments from the 23/5/2018 every 4 weeks of £188+..

 

I know there would have been a top up of around £88.00 to be paid but again unwell and head sunk completely in the ground.

 

I guess thats all I would receive by email from them although there was a ground rent fine added to the total balance of the mortgage around February of over £1000.00

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Solicitor letter received 8th September giving me 7 days to pay the arrears, solicitors and Kensington informed by telephone of circumstances DWP SMI loan being processed, depression anxiety and illness on the 13th and court papers received 18th September.. court papers show £1000.00 arrears when contacted Kensington it was almost £1400.00.. sorry for the bit by bit info but head is spinning

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part55

 

Defendant's response

55.7

 

(1) An acknowledgment of service is not required and Part 10 does not apply.

 

(2) In a possession claim against trespassers rule 15.2 does not apply and the defendant need not file a defence.

 

(3) Where, in any other possession claim, the defendant does not file a defence within the time specified in rule 15.4, he may take part in any hearing but the court may take his failure to do so into account when deciding what order to make about costs.

 

(4) Part 12 (default judgment) does not apply in a claim to which this Part applies.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

There's no date for defence to be submitted specified which I thought was Strange leaving me wondering when my defence was due?

 

Hadituotohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ground rent fine? how come that's been added to your mortgage?

or am I reading that bit wrong?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 55.7

 

(3) Where, in any other possession claim, the defendant does not file a defence within the time specified in rule 15.4, he may take part in any hearing but the court may take his failure to do so into account when deciding what order to make about costs.

 

 

 

 

 

The period for filing a defence

15.4

 

(1) The general rule is that the period for filing a defence is –

 

(a) 14 days after service of the particulars of claim; or

 

(b) if the defendant files an acknowledgment of service under Part 10, 28 days after service of the particulars of claim.

 

(Rule 7.4 provides for the particulars of claim to be contained in or served with the claim form or served within 14 days of service of the claim form)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...