Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • doh sorry was on phone screen. i think thats all ok,  let @AndyOrch confirm 1st please. dx  
    • Same date as poc then i dont like the agreement either, it just smells to me, but i can't find a like one of that era to compare against. this is only 10yrs old, so weight that up, i'd say enforceable & most are from the ear as a whole here. it cant be a recon as they must state so, and it wouldn't/doesn't need to have a tickbox+typed name to be so either. >80% loss if you go fwd, unless you can pay the CCJ within 30 days of judgement in FULL, might be time to consider a tomlin/consent, as much as i hate link, if you don't want to gamble on a very small chance of a win or can't pay within 30 days if you lose. what date is the hearing? dx    
    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor CCJ Cabot/Restons - old Blackhorse loan - **WON ** successfully set aside & Cabot Paid my costs!!


9000Parts
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

seems maybe then the ccj shld now be setaside, and the claim itself dead.

note cpr part 38 re discontinuance. have you received such cpr notice?

ordinarily it wld be auto liable for the others costs. but it says not applicable re if allocated to small claims track. has it been allocated?

otherwise, maybe 'wasted costs' against the rep under Practice direction 46?

see what the guys say

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have an official looking Notice of Discontinuance with an actual signature on it (not a photocopied version). I still dont really know what track it was on or is now allocated to as I have never seen any of the original paperwork or any of the court paperwork. I assume it is/was small claims as it was just under £4K.

 

If it is Small Claims then what other avenues do I have to make them cough? Assume its a case of threaten them to pay or take action against them. What avenues do I have on that front? This may be the best example and with the best evidence of a willing backdoor case that ive come across on this forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Procedure for discontinuing

 

38.3

(1) To discontinue a claim or part of a claim, a claimant must –

(a) file a notice of discontinuance; and

(b) serve a copy of it on every other party to the proceedings.

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part38

if it hasnt formally been allocated to smalls, then the auto costs liability following disc (para 38.6) could apply. otherwise, maybe the 'wasted costs' i mentioned. or...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Trouble is, I have no idea where I am. Last hearing I had was to set aside the judgement, this got adjourned so as it stands the claim hasnt been set aside yet and the CCJ is still active. Does this mean that the case isnt allocated any more or would it rely on how it was originally allocated?

 

Maybe the Judge will decide he isnt going to consent and allow the hearing to continue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the Judge will decide he isnt going to consent and allow the hearing to continue?

unlikely, if the disc is proper and covers the set aside and the original claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if the court has granted the ccj from 29/12 and now this is your set aside application, how can restons issue a discontinuance?

This is your action now isn't it?

 

Maybe im not fully understanding something!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was thinking that they arent objecting to the set aside (as they said in the proposed con order), the ccj then being set aside back to the claim, which they now want to discontinue? not entirely clear whats happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if the court has granted the ccj from 29/12 and now this is your set aside application, how can restons issue a discontinuance?

This is your action now isn't it?

 

Maybe im not fully understanding something!

 

I dont really understand either but here is a condensed version:

 

29/12 Judgement in Default granted for close to £4000 at my previous address

Feb. Noticed CCJ on my Credit Report so started chasing Northampton and local court.

March. Submitted N244 to set aside, wrong address and stature barred

Early April. Visited local County Court for set aside hearing. Hearing was adjourned so both parties could get their acts together.

Late April. Submitted my Witness Statement with good evidence claimant had my current address and Statute Barred.

Last week. Offered a Consent form for Rectums to set aside and withdraw claim. Refused until cost are paid.

Last week. Offered a 2nd Consent form with £120 costs to set aside and withdraw. Raefused again on lack of costs.

This week. Deadline has passed for Rectums Witness Statement to be received. Notice of Discontinuance issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess is they know they have no hope having seen my Witness Statement (want me to post it up?) for the set aside hearing so they have decided they want to bail out and withdraw. Tells me they may have something to hide too as they havent even tried pushing their luck just went straight to asking me to consent to set aside and withdraw the claim completely. I am only asking for a set aside so I can defend the case but they have decided to leapfrog that by withdrawing the claim in its entirety. Doesnt really follow any of the cases I have read on the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant issue a Notice of Discontinuance once judgment has been granted...the Caimant can only stop it by both parties consenting to a set a side and withdraw..to kill the claim.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if I dont sign the Consent Order(s) they sent me (because they wont cover my costs) then the claim is still on?

 

29/12 Judgement in Default granted for close to £4000 at my previous address

Feb. Noticed CCJ on my Credit Report so started chasing Northampton and local court.

March. Submitted N244link3.gif to set aside, wrong address and stature barred

Early April. Visited local county courtlink3.gif for set aside hearing. Hearing was adjourned so both parties could get their acts together.

Late April. Submitted my Witness Statement with good evidence claimant had my current address and statute barredlink3.gif.

Last week. Offered a Consent form from Rectums to set aside and withdraw claim. Refused until my costs are paid.

Last week. Offered a 2nd Consent form from Rectums with £120 costs to set aside and withdraw. Refused again on lack of costs.

This week. Deadline has passed for Rectums Witness Statement to be received. Notice of Discontinuance issued by Rectums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if I dont sign the Consent Order(s) they sent me (because they wont cover my costs) then the claim is still on?

 

 

Yes...but only if they wish to proceed.....if they dont then the Judge will set a side dismiss the claim at the next hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So whats going on? Is this Rectums playing games again or is it the fact that Ms. Danielle Leah Armstrong (Trainee Solicitor, Grade D) isnt a very good learner?

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You continue until its set aside, then they can discontinue their claim.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes by all means raise it...if its dismissed...but you wont get much more or possibly even less than they have already offered...as this is small claims track.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the courts wont do anything either...your not going to change the murky world of DCAs and defunct debt buying.....too many fat cats involved.

Accept their Consent...accept their offer of wasted costs...put an end to it and enjoy your life...lifes too short.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes by all means raise it...if its dismissed...but you wont get much more or possibly even less than they have already offered...as this is small claims track.
As it was a default judgment through no reply to claim (so effectively rubber stamped by the court regardless of the amount claimed) If it went to set aside hearing and successful then the claim would revert back to claim issued stage where the OP would file his defence and then the claim would get allocated to track. I'm not sure but at the moment would it still be trackless?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it will remain trackless until allocation..should it ever proceed....but if any costs are allowed they would be restricted to the SCT rules..IMHO...but that's for the DJ to decide.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week. Offered a 2nd Consent form with £120 costs to set aside and withdraw

ok. they are agreeing the set aside, then will discontinue their claim.

is that 120 in addition to them paying you the court setaside application fee you paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. they are agreeing the set aside, then will discontinue their claim.

is that 120 in addition to them paying you the court setaside application fee you paid?

 

The £120 is all they offered which doesnt cover the N244. If they had offered £275 then I might have been tempted to accept but as I put in my reply email to Ms. Danielle Leah Armstrong (Trainee Solicitor, Grade D) thir offer was frankly insulting.

 

The letter containing the Notice of Discontinuance mentions a date for the hearing but to date I have not had notification from the Courts about this. Would they have got the information before me or do they get electronic notification while my copy is sent on a Royal Snail?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

shld at least get back the court fee. how about trying to negotiate that then, so it includes the court fee?

 

as has been posted, it wont be 'discontinued' until there has at least been a set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...