Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reduced hours but yet took more staff on


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm contracted to 3 days a week and recently a member of staff who did 5 days a week has took a year off due to illness, I was working 5-6 days a week for 2 months I was happy to do this. Then they took on another member of staff on a 4 day contract.

 

For the last 2 months I've been doing 4 days a week, but had a call today saying that I've too many holidays booked, not sure how my wage slip says 7 left but manager says 5, that I can look into more.

then went on to say look because you have worked 4 days for the last few weeks I can only give you 1 shift week for the next 4 weeks! I said no I can't!! I'm the only one working in our house as my partner job was lost (due to company going into administration)

Then said I've covered all my contracted hours the last few weeks! But yet the be person is still getting more hours!

 

I'm fuming what can I do. I've not been with company for 2 years only 9 months, so not sure what to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

I said that too but apprently because I've done 4 days a week instead of 3 the last few weeks it covers the fact I'm now not getting 3 days a week, I stressed that was over time but apprently there is nothing I can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest topcat14

If you are contracted to work 3 days per week then that is what they should pay you for....no argument.

 

Your employer should not change your contracted hours without your agreement. It would be interesting to know what exactly (ie word for word) your Terms & Conditions state about your hours of work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest topcat14

Ok, do you have a "Job Offer" letter that states 3 days per week ? or any documents at all that indicate your expected hours of work. Did you sign the terms

 

As you have worked for 7 months on 3 days per week previous to the increase in hours for the last 2 months, I would suggest "Custom & Practice" could come into play but........your employer would only have to show that there were business reasons to cut your hours for it to be a fair decision.

 

On the other hand they have taken on someone else. Is the new employee performing the same job role as you ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do 4 hours every week for six months when your original contracted hours are three

 

You will be then in a position to request your contracted hours be made up to 4 as you can show a business need for you to be doing 4 hours a week regular

 

Are you sure? Your post here seems to suggest that 6 months is a definitive timeline. Whilst there 'might' be a reason to 'request' a change in normal hours using business need in support of the request, or even to argue that C&P has implied a change to contracted hours of work after 6 months, there is surely no fixed point at which such a request would be granted automatically, or even more likely to be successful. The 'business need' would also depend largely on the nature of the business itself - seasonality or a fluctuation in orders being only two factors to consider.

 

Only a Tribunal can ultimately determine whether C&P has changed the terms of a contract.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stated six months to be before you even Consider to ask for custom and practice and increase in contracted hours , i myself would go with 12 months minimum

 

Depends on your employer but even under custom and practice they can still say no.

 

The only get out will be if you are continually on a Fixed term or Fixed term temporary contract. But then you will have to wait 4 years before getting your contractual terms increased to a full term substantive contract under statute

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct. And of course the peril of trying to assert Custom and Practice often serves to remind the employer that maybe they need to revert to the contracted hours and bang goes any chance of regular overtime in the future!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't do as this company don't let you, and why should I when I was promised 3 days a week and now not getting it and they took on more staff for the same role and give them more hours.

 

You should get alternative employment as your current one does not suit you. They seem to be acting legally. Therefore "it's not fair!" will not do you any good.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...