Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry to ask, but I know I had SB template on PC, but can't find it. Also any search for template\SB letter takes me back here.  Any help to get to SB letter would be appreciated. I know I used it on a car HP co that wouldn't honor my FCS refund and after 6 years came threatening ( or rather their DCA). Worked a treat. Thanks in advance
    • Received this letter today after all this time !! Doesn’t sound like just a threat any advice please  Thanks  Photo.pdf
    • Good evening. Hoping to keep this short and concise. Any help really appreciated! Sent originated from council tax in 2019.  I moved address for a new career 240miles away in December 2019 and have lived here ever since.  A distant friend resides at previous address.  A CCJ was filed regarding this debt in January 2020 but no correspondence was received my end or at the old address.  Move forward to this year; early April I learn of a letter received from Bailiff - Notice of Enforcement dated 13/03. Stated I had ten days to settle a payment/payment plan or £75 will be added after ten days from 13/03 and bailiff instructed to visit.  Obviously I was unaware of this letter till well after the time period passed. Attempted to contact Dukes via email but zero response. Asked for breathing space in order to check the original debt with the respective council (I wasn’t awarded a week of Housing despite being on UC for a short period due to a contract date given by the old employer).  29/04 a note was left at the old address stating a bailiff had visited. New balance £310 more than original outstanding.  I’ve since contacted both the council and the bailiff agent to state I’m more than happy to settle the original debt over a payment plan but at this stage they will not remove the fees despite all correspondence not being sent to me and obviously me only seeing them much later than one would have expected.  Tried live chat today with the company and firstly was told the fees will remain because I spoke to the enforcement agent - I have never spoken to him/her.  secondly told the fees would remain because “I tried to use their web chat service to complete an income form” - I have zero recollection of doing this and I also wonder if it’s another tactic? any help on where I stand with the fees added would be incredible. Thank you
    • the evidence you have from Mercedes is perfect. simply write to both the finance company and the dealership that sold you the car, stating under the consumer rights Act 2015 should a fault appear outside of 6mts, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale. Please find enclosed a copy of said report from Mercedes at XXXX stating quite clearly that the windscreen was replaced on Date , some xxx months/years BEFORE my purchase on DATE. there is a bill to pay of XXX to XXX , i expect you to sort this out between yourselves , i am not liable for this. something upon those lines anyway.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TK Maxx - I was caught changing a price tag and admitted it


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I was caught changing a price tag and admitted it,

 

 

staff took a photo of my bank card on his phone!!!! (Not happy with that)

 

 

question is should i complain about taking the photo on a personal mobile of my bank card

and should i pay the RLP?

 

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi diidee

 

Do not pay RLp anything. Just ignore them. totally.

 

You also need to contact your bank asap and get them to block the card, you need to write to tk maxx and demand an apology as what the guard did was worse than what you did.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response ��

 

 

i was totally confused with what was going on at the time as i had my 16 year old daughter with me and i know i shouldn't have done what i done

 

 

im a bit crazy at times and act before i think,

 

 

I denied it at 1st

but realised my daughter could be affected by my crazy actions and just wanted out,

 

 

the staff where very loud/shouting

,the guy was shaking as if it was him who had done wrong

and i felt i need to get my daughter and myself out of here,

 

 

i demanded my daughter leave the room

said im sorry i shouldn't have done that it was foolish

was then asked if i was being sarcastic!!!!

 

 

Showed my ID and left,now im ragging at the fact that they took a photo of my bank card ��

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi diidee

 

Do not pay RLp anything. Just ignore them. totally.

 

You also need to contact your bank asap and get them to block the card, you need to write to tk maxx and demand an apology as what the guard did was worse than what you did.

thanks for your advice 😉
Link to post
Share on other sites

totally ignore them(rlp)

 

 

I've made your own thread for you

 

 

simply read a few threads here too

 

 

and you'll get the idea.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your bank that your card has been compromised and you want a new one. Tell TKmaxx by letter to head office that their staff have taken your card details for reasons unknown and without your consent and require them to explain for what lawful reason this was done and to quote the statute that allows them to do so. Tell them that you require proof of destruction of the image taken. They wont be able to answer that because there is no answer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your bank that your card has been compromised and you want a new one. Tell TKmaxx by letter to head office that their staff have taken your card details for reasons unknown and without your consent and require them to explain for what lawful reason this was done and to quote the statute that allows them to do so. Tell them that you require proof of destruction of the image taken. They wont be able to answer that because there is no answer

 

Totally agree here. Taking pictures like this on an unsecured mobile phone is very poor practice.

Do not write about the incident of price swapping, just concentrate on their data protection policy.

 

Once RLP start getting involved, come back and we can help see them off.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote 'as what the guard did was worse than what you did'.

 

No, it wasn't. Obtaining goods, money or services by deception is tantamount to fraud and in the right circumstances can lead to Prison. Taking a photograph of a bank card is dumb, but not worse than fraud.

 

H

46 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

HMCTS Approved Technical Expert and Independent Motor Trade Consultant

Link to post
Share on other sites

tantamount

ˈtantəmaʊnt/Submit

adjective

equivalent in seriousness to; virtually the same as.

"the resignations were tantamount to an admission of guilt"

synonyms: equivalent to, equal to, amounting to, as good as, more or less, synonymous with, virtually the same as, much the same as, comparable to, on a par with, commensurate with, along the lines of, as serious as, identical to

 

H

46 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

HMCTS Approved Technical Expert and Independent Motor Trade Consultant

Link to post
Share on other sites

tantamount

ˈtantəmaʊnt/Submit

adjective

equivalent in seriousness to; virtually the same as.

"the resignations were tantamount to an admission of guilt"

synonyms: equivalent to, equal to, amounting to, as good as, more or less, synonymous with, virtually the same as, much the same as, comparable to, on a par with, commensurate with, along the lines of, as serious as, identical to

 

H

 

Tantamount is indeed "virtually the same as"

"Tantamount to" =/= "identical to", though.

 

Why say "it is tantamount to fraud" when "it is fraud"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your bank that your card has been compromised and you want a new one. Tell TKmaxx by letter to head office that their staff have taken your card details for reasons unknown and without your consent and require them to explain for what lawful reason this was done and to quote the statute that allows them to do so. Tell them that you require proof of destruction of the image taken. They wont be able to answer that because there is no answer

 

Correct, but why "poke a bear"? Cancel the card and be glad you got away with it. They'll say the card details were taken to ID you.

 

You risk them looking at events again & deciding to involve the police for your criminal act.

 

The worst case for them? That the police ask them why they delayed involving them.

The worst case for you? Prosecution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, but why "poke a bear"? Cancel the card and be glad you got away with it. They'll say the card details were taken to ID you.

 

Meanwhile, the guards will continue to take the card details unabated.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my god.

 

Will some people here get a grip.

 

Taking a photo of a card is not illegal in any way shape or form.

 

You don't even own the card, it is property of the issuing bank.

 

Your name has never been personal sensitive information.

 

However, as pointed out, ticket swapping is FRAUD. A criminal offence.

 

To add to above posters notes - just because the store didn't call the police at the time, does not mean they cant re assess the situation, in light of a complaint, and call them in. There is no magical time limit, and the store make no promise not to prosecute. Just because they let you go, doesn't mean they cant change their minds.

 

we always used to take a scan or photo of both the person and the ID used, so when they wrote in, in 6 months time, stating it wasn't them, we could prove it. Also, if further offences came to light (which with ticket switching, some led to outstanding jobs for refund fraud), we had proof of who they were and where they lived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youre forgetting that the details of the card can be taken and used for other reasons maxxer. Why not allow me to come to you and copy all the info on your card?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youre forgetting that the details of the card can be taken and used for other reasons maxxer. Why not allow me to come to you and copy all the info on your card?

 

Agree however, the card is unlikely to be useful without the three digit security code on the back. What I am worried about is the security guard using his mobile phone to take the photgraph.

Was it a company phone or a private one. If the latter, this should not be allowed as it is not a secure way to store any data on.

 

In response to Maxxer.

 

To add to above posters notes - just because the store didn't call the police at the time, does not mean they cant re assess the situation, in light of a complaint, and call them in. There is no magical time limit, and the store make no promise not to prosecute. Just because they let you go, doesn't mean they cant change their minds.

 

As you know from your time working at TKMaxx, once the details have been passed over to RLP, that is the end of their involvement. If the police were called later, TKMaxx would have to explain why they did not call the police at the time of the illegal action. If insisted upon, the police will attend. If no call was made, why would they come after so many days/weeks/months when the staff had all the evidence there and then.

 

Unless a magistrate orders compensation to the store, there is no incentive to get the police involved. RLP however do share the revenue they obtain. The money sharing data is confidential however TKMaxx would get more than the actual cost of the stolen/tag switched item.

 

This is why we on this forum would resist RLPs demands. Let a competent authority deal with this. Cautions/FPNs for first timers is usually enough for them to stop. The shoplifters who consider it their day job, won't care either way.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...